| Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Gowdy: Looks Like FBI Gave Immunity to 'Triggerman' Who Deleted Hillary's Emails | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 9 2016, 02:33 PM (124 Views) | |
| Alt Right PEPE | Sep 9 2016, 02:33 PM Post #1 |
|
Gowdy: Looks Like FBI Gave Immunity to 'Triggerman' Who Deleted Hillary's Emails We're learning this morning that the IT specialist who deleted Hillary Clinton's emails from her private server was granted immunity by the Justice Department. According to the New York Times report, the immunity deal was made with Paul Combetta, who worked for a Colorado company called Platte River Networks, a private firm that managed the server. TREY GOWDY: If the FBI and the Department of Justice gave this witness transactional immunity, it is tantamount to giving the triggerman immunity in a robbery case. I was stunned when I read the New York Times article last night and by the way, the same reporter who broke the article last night, is the guy who broke the initial email story so I’m inclined to believe it unless there’s evidence to the contrary. But it looks like they gave immunity to the very person you’d most want to prosecute. Which is the person who destroyed official public records after there was a subpoena and after there was a preservation order. And that defies logic why some techie in Colorado would, despite a subpoena, despite a preservation order but after a conference call with David Kendall and Cheryl Mills decide on his own that he is going to destroy public records. And then you grant this person immunity which means, perhaps that he cannot be prosecuted – [FBI Director] Comey said he’s not going to prosecute anybody. We need to ask the FBI, what kind of immunity did you give and why did you give it to the triggerman? Why did you give it to the person who actually destroyed government documents? So why would the FBI give the guy who deleted the emails immunity? http://www.westernjournalism.com/gowdy-doj-gave-immunity-triggerman-deleted-hillary-clintons-emails/ Edited by Alt Right PEPE, Sep 9 2016, 02:35 PM.
|
|
"Be polite, be friendly. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet." Gen Mattis | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic » |






3:28 PM Jul 11