|
When will we see action on this?; #1 campaign promise
|
|
Topic Started: Nov 10 2016, 06:57 AM (2,033 Views)
|
|
CautionaryTales
|
Nov 10 2016, 11:22 AM
Post #41
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
In my opinion the biggest problem we have had over the last eight years has been the obstructionism tactic that has been used to thwart Obama. This sunk to the lowest levels and was counter productive to the needs of this country. For whatever reason used, it was wrong and I would hope it isn't used by the Democrats on any wide scale. There is no reason for it to continue now and even though President Trumps most publicized intentions could be considered impractical, I don't want them to fail because of Democratic Party politics trying to sabotage them. If they fail, they need to fail on their lack of merit.
The Republican were reprehensible in their sabotage of Obama. I won't forgive that, but there is no need to see any of that continue. It's time to move beyond the bullsh!t and I hope we don't see it again from either party.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
estonianman
|
Nov 10 2016, 11:34 AM
Post #42
|
|
- Posts:
- 19,750
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #44
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 11:22 AM
In my opinion the biggest problem we have had over the last eight years has been the obstructionism tactic that has been used to thwart Obama. This sunk to the lowest levels and was counter productive to the needs of this country. For whatever reason used, it was wrong and I would hope it isn't used by the Democrats on any wide scale. There is no reason for it to continue now and even though President Trumps most publicized intentions could be considered impractical, I don't want them to fail because of Democratic Party politics trying to sabotage them. If they fail, they need to fail on their lack of merit.
The Republican were reprehensible in their sabotage of Obama. I won't forgive that, but there is no need to see any of that continue. It's time to move beyond the bullsh!t and I hope we don't see it again from either party. He got the ACA passed and that turned out to be a disaster.
|
|
MEEK AND MILD
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Nov 10 2016, 11:47 AM
Post #43
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 11:34 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 11:22 AM
In my opinion the biggest problem we have had over the last eight years has been the obstructionism tactic that has been used to thwart Obama. This sunk to the lowest levels and was counter productive to the needs of this country. For whatever reason used, it was wrong and I would hope it isn't used by the Democrats on any wide scale. There is no reason for it to continue now and even though President Trumps most publicized intentions could be considered impractical, I don't want them to fail because of Democratic Party politics trying to sabotage them. If they fail, they need to fail on their lack of merit.
The Republican were reprehensible in their sabotage of Obama. I won't forgive that, but there is no need to see any of that continue. It's time to move beyond the bullsh!t and I hope we don't see it again from either party.
He got the ACA passed and that turned out to be a disaster. Sabotage will do that. That was the unfortunate reality of why it failed.
But that is behind us now. I don't see Trump being sabotaged by the Republicans or the Democrats. I prefer making reality work. The reality is that Trump is going to be the President on Jan 20. There is no election to contest anymore.
I want Trump to get a fair shot at accomplishing the goals he set out and the people of the country supported by electing him to do so. I don't have to agree with those goals, but I won't campaign for sabotage. It's a despicable tactic.
I want to know if the people expect him to deliver what they believe they bought.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:02 PM
Post #44
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,244
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
To get Mexico's cooperation in building our wall, we must first get their attention by dropping a few nukes on their ass...........
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
estonianman
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:03 PM
Post #45
|
|
- Posts:
- 19,750
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #44
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 11:47 AM
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 11:34 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 11:22 AM
In my opinion the biggest problem we have had over the last eight years has been the obstructionism tactic that has been used to thwart Obama. This sunk to the lowest levels and was counter productive to the needs of this country. For whatever reason used, it was wrong and I would hope it isn't used by the Democrats on any wide scale. There is no reason for it to continue now and even though President Trumps most publicized intentions could be considered impractical, I don't want them to fail because of Democratic Party politics trying to sabotage them. If they fail, they need to fail on their lack of merit.
The Republican were reprehensible in their sabotage of Obama. I won't forgive that, but there is no need to see any of that continue. It's time to move beyond the bullsh!t and I hope we don't see it again from either party.
He got the ACA passed and that turned out to be a disaster.
Sabotage will do that. That was the unfortunate reality of why it failed. But that is behind us now. I don't see Trump being sabotaged by the Republicans or the Democrats. I prefer making reality work. The reality is that Trump is going to be the President on Jan 20. There is no election to contest anymore. I want Trump to get a fair shot at accomplishing the goals he set out and the people of the country supported by electing him to do so. I don't have to agree with those goals, but I won't campaign for sabotage. It's a despicable tactic. I want to know if the people expect him to deliver what they believe they bought. No - it was a disaster because it didn't address cost which is an inhibitor to accessibility.
Had obstructionism actually happened and with the ACA - we would all be better off for it.
|
|
MEEK AND MILD
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:15 PM
Post #46
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:03 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 11:47 AM
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 11:34 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 11:22 AM
In my opinion the biggest problem we have had over the last eight years has been the obstructionism tactic that has been used to thwart Obama. This sunk to the lowest levels and was counter productive to the needs of this country. For whatever reason used, it was wrong and I would hope it isn't used by the Democrats on any wide scale. There is no reason for it to continue now and even though President Trumps most publicized intentions could be considered impractical, I don't want them to fail because of Democratic Party politics trying to sabotage them. If they fail, they need to fail on their lack of merit.
The Republican were reprehensible in their sabotage of Obama. I won't forgive that, but there is no need to see any of that continue. It's time to move beyond the bullsh!t and I hope we don't see it again from either party.
He got the ACA passed and that turned out to be a disaster.
Sabotage will do that. That was the unfortunate reality of why it failed. But that is behind us now. I don't see Trump being sabotaged by the Republicans or the Democrats. I prefer making reality work. The reality is that Trump is going to be the President on Jan 20. There is no election to contest anymore. I want Trump to get a fair shot at accomplishing the goals he set out and the people of the country supported by electing him to do so. I don't have to agree with those goals, but I won't campaign for sabotage. It's a despicable tactic. I want to know if the people expect him to deliver what they believe they bought.
No - it was a disaster because it didn't address cost which is an inhibitor to accessibility. Had obstructionism actually happened and with the ACA - we would all be better off for it. Old news buddy, Trump is gonna deep six it on day one. It died the death of a thousand cuts. Didn't you hear?
No point in beating that dead horse. What do you expect Trump to deliver?
It's time to look at what can be done now.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
estonianman
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:21 PM
Post #47
|
|
- Posts:
- 19,750
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #44
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:15 PM
What do you expect Trump to deliver?
IF Trump removes special interests, corporatism and straggling regulation from the healthcare market - we'll all be better off.
|
|
MEEK AND MILD
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:35 PM
Post #48
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:21 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:15 PM
What do you expect Trump to deliver?
IF Trump removes special interests, corporatism and straggling regulation from the healthcare market - we'll all be better off. Isn't that all a part of his promise package?
What do You expect him to do specifically? From the linked article. Got a time frame of action?
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:38 PM
Post #49
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
When will we see these tariffs?
4. Impose tariffs on goods made in China and Mexico
Warren Maruyama, a former general counsel to the U.S. Trade Representative under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, told us President Trump would have the authority under a variety of trade statutes to impose higher tariffs, but added "it would lead to a trade war and cost hundreds and thousands of jobs."
Hal Shapiro, an attorney specializing in international trade practice, pointed to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 which gives the president the power to impose retaliatory tariffs on countries that violate trade agreements or engage in unfair trade practices under. But Shapiro said he can’t think of "a single instance" where a U.S. company offshoring is considered an unfair trade practice by the foreign country.
Trump’s promise also violates international trade rules, and he’s yet to propose exiting the World Trade Organization. So assuming the United States stays in the club, Beijing and Mexico City wouldn’t take his blanket tariffs lying down and would almost certainly retaliate.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
estonianman
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:40 PM
Post #50
|
|
- Posts:
- 19,750
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #44
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:35 PM
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:21 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:15 PM
What do you expect Trump to deliver?
IF Trump removes special interests, corporatism and straggling regulation from the healthcare market - we'll all be better off.
Isn't that all a part of his promise package? What do You expect him to do specifically? From the linked article. Remove government interference from the marketplace. Its not that hard to understand comrade. Got a time frame of action? No. But with an all republican legislature probably lickity split.
|
|
MEEK AND MILD
|
| |
|
estonianman
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:42 PM
Post #51
|
|
- Posts:
- 19,750
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #44
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:38 PM
When will we see these tariffs?
4. Impose tariffs on goods made in China and Mexico
Warren Maruyama, a former general counsel to the U.S. Trade Representative under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, told us President Trump would have the authority under a variety of trade statutes to impose higher tariffs, but added "it would lead to a trade war and cost hundreds and thousands of jobs."
Hal Shapiro, an attorney specializing in international trade practice, pointed to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 which gives the president the power to impose retaliatory tariffs on countries that violate trade agreements or engage in unfair trade practices under. But Shapiro said he can’t think of "a single instance" where a U.S. company offshoring is considered an unfair trade practice by the foreign country.
Trump’s promise also violates international trade rules, and he’s yet to propose exiting the World Trade Organization. So assuming the United States stays in the club, Beijing and Mexico City wouldn’t take his blanket tariffs lying down and would almost certainly retaliate. I love how your asking questions but don't give a feck about the answers.
A clearcut sign of epic butthurt.
|
|
MEEK AND MILD
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:44 PM
Post #52
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:40 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:35 PM
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:21 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:15 PM
What do you expect Trump to deliver?
IF Trump removes special interests, corporatism and straggling regulation from the healthcare market - we'll all be better off.
Isn't that all a part of his promise package? What do You expect him to do specifically? From the linked article. Remove government interference from the marketplace. Its not that hard to understand comrade. Got a time frame of action? No. But with an all republican legislature probably lickity split.
I'm not interested in arguing with you here. I'm interested in seeing what time frame his supporters expect him to produce on his promise.
I would think it could be nearly immediately if he goes into office with all his ducks lined up. He has all of the support he needs.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:45 PM
Post #53
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:42 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:38 PM
When will we see these tariffs?
4. Impose tariffs on goods made in China and Mexico
Warren Maruyama, a former general counsel to the U.S. Trade Representative under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, told us President Trump would have the authority under a variety of trade statutes to impose higher tariffs, but added "it would lead to a trade war and cost hundreds and thousands of jobs."
Hal Shapiro, an attorney specializing in international trade practice, pointed to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 which gives the president the power to impose retaliatory tariffs on countries that violate trade agreements or engage in unfair trade practices under. But Shapiro said he can’t think of "a single instance" where a U.S. company offshoring is considered an unfair trade practice by the foreign country.
Trump’s promise also violates international trade rules, and he’s yet to propose exiting the World Trade Organization. So assuming the United States stays in the club, Beijing and Mexico City wouldn’t take his blanket tariffs lying down and would almost certainly retaliate.
I love how your asking questions but don't give a feck about the answers. A clearcut sign of epic butthurt. It isn't butthurt. I am simply asking you guys what you expect from the new President.
Before the excuses become the answer.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
estonianman
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:46 PM
Post #54
|
|
- Posts:
- 19,750
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #44
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:45 PM
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:42 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:38 PM
When will we see these tariffs?
4. Impose tariffs on goods made in China and Mexico
Warren Maruyama, a former general counsel to the U.S. Trade Representative under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, told us President Trump would have the authority under a variety of trade statutes to impose higher tariffs, but added "it would lead to a trade war and cost hundreds and thousands of jobs."
Hal Shapiro, an attorney specializing in international trade practice, pointed to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 which gives the president the power to impose retaliatory tariffs on countries that violate trade agreements or engage in unfair trade practices under. But Shapiro said he can’t think of "a single instance" where a U.S. company offshoring is considered an unfair trade practice by the foreign country.
Trump’s promise also violates international trade rules, and he’s yet to propose exiting the World Trade Organization. So assuming the United States stays in the club, Beijing and Mexico City wouldn’t take his blanket tariffs lying down and would almost certainly retaliate.
I love how your asking questions but don't give a feck about the answers. A clearcut sign of epic butthurt.
It isn't butthurt. I am simply asking you guys what you expect from the new President. Before the excuses become the answer. You're in pain my friend.
Take a few days off.
|
|
MEEK AND MILD
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:48 PM
Post #55
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:46 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:45 PM
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:42 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:38 PM
When will we see these tariffs?
4. Impose tariffs on goods made in China and Mexico
Warren Maruyama, a former general counsel to the U.S. Trade Representative under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, told us President Trump would have the authority under a variety of trade statutes to impose higher tariffs, but added "it would lead to a trade war and cost hundreds and thousands of jobs."
Hal Shapiro, an attorney specializing in international trade practice, pointed to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 which gives the president the power to impose retaliatory tariffs on countries that violate trade agreements or engage in unfair trade practices under. But Shapiro said he can’t think of "a single instance" where a U.S. company offshoring is considered an unfair trade practice by the foreign country.
Trump’s promise also violates international trade rules, and he’s yet to propose exiting the World Trade Organization. So assuming the United States stays in the club, Beijing and Mexico City wouldn’t take his blanket tariffs lying down and would almost certainly retaliate.
I love how your asking questions but don't give a feck about the answers. A clearcut sign of epic butthurt.
It isn't butthurt. I am simply asking you guys what you expect from the new President. Before the excuses become the answer.
You're in pain my friend. Take a few days off. Aren't you interested in supporting President Trump? I am.
I'm hoping he gets his way on everything he has said he will do. The sooner the better. It's the least America deserves after voting hm into office.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
Katoblue
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:48 PM
Post #56
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,257
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #40
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
I expect the Wall will be ahead of schedule and under budget! don't ask what the schedule is for even Trump hasn't set that yet.. you'll just have to wait until president Trump is sworn in to find out.. but it will be magnificent.. Trump doesn't do anything less then magnificent..
|
|
Killary, DNC, Obummer's DOJ and FBI all Lied and Spied and Good People Died!
|
| |
|
estonianman
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:49 PM
Post #57
|
|
- Posts:
- 19,750
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #44
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:48 PM
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:46 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:45 PM
- estonianman
- Nov 10 2016, 12:42 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Nov 10 2016, 12:38 PM
When will we see these tariffs?
4. Impose tariffs on goods made in China and Mexico
Warren Maruyama, a former general counsel to the U.S. Trade Representative under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, told us President Trump would have the authority under a variety of trade statutes to impose higher tariffs, but added "it would lead to a trade war and cost hundreds and thousands of jobs."
Hal Shapiro, an attorney specializing in international trade practice, pointed to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 which gives the president the power to impose retaliatory tariffs on countries that violate trade agreements or engage in unfair trade practices under. But Shapiro said he can’t think of "a single instance" where a U.S. company offshoring is considered an unfair trade practice by the foreign country.
Trump’s promise also violates international trade rules, and he’s yet to propose exiting the World Trade Organization. So assuming the United States stays in the club, Beijing and Mexico City wouldn’t take his blanket tariffs lying down and would almost certainly retaliate.
I love how your asking questions but don't give a feck about the answers. A clearcut sign of epic butthurt.
It isn't butthurt. I am simply asking you guys what you expect from the new President. Before the excuses become the answer.
You're in pain my friend. Take a few days off.
Aren't you interested in supporting President Trump? I am. I'm hoping he gets his way on everything he has said he will do. The sooner the better. It's the least American deserves. Government cannot create anything, it can only choose to destroy less.
We'll see if Trump understands this in about 2 months.
|
|
MEEK AND MILD
|
| |
|
Alt Right PEPE
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:50 PM
Post #58
|
|
- Posts:
- 7,765
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #195
- Joined:
- May 14, 2016
|
|
We Will Gnaw on ANTIFA Skulls
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:50 PM
Post #59
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- Katoblue
- Nov 10 2016, 12:48 PM
I expect the Wall will be ahead of schedule and under budget! don't ask what the schedule is for even Trump hasn't set that yet.. you'll just have to wait until president Trump is sworn in to find out.. but it will be magnificent.. Trump doesn't do anything less then magnificent.. I'm excited for you, Kato. How will he get Mexico to pay for it? Or will I get the bill?
PS..I'm not Mexican.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Nov 10 2016, 12:53 PM
Post #60
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- I_feel_the_trump
- Nov 10 2016, 12:50 PM
All I'm doing is asking a few pertinent questions esto. You win, it's time for you guys to do the job and time for you to be happy about the opportunity.
The dog caught the car, let's see what he is going to do with it.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|