|
Donald Trump taking intel briefings only once a week
|
|
Topic Started: Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM (1,885 Views)
|
|
Coast2coast
|
Dec 10 2016, 09:53 PM
Post #21
|
|
- Posts:
- 16,072
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #19
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Robert Stout
- Dec 10 2016, 02:31 AM
- Coast2coast
- Dec 10 2016, 01:39 AM
- Right-Wing
- Dec 10 2016, 01:11 AM
CNN=Fake News
It's shocking and irresponsible for anyone to excuse this lack of attention to the job he was hired to do. Way to large a majority of conservatives today will change any truth, tell any lie and excuse any failure on his part to support this clown. I get the ones that don't know better, they go through life like that. But is every conservative this short of ethics, integrity and common sense?
I feel compelled to notify you that Trump has job security for at least 4 years....Handle it............... Doesn't change or address a thing I said. Speaking of things that can't be handled.
|
|
|
| |
|
Coast2coast
|
Dec 10 2016, 09:57 PM
Post #22
|
|
- Posts:
- 16,072
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #19
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- clone
- Dec 10 2016, 02:33 PM
- Coast2coast
- Dec 9 2016, 10:20 PM
He has got to be kidding! When is someone going to tell him there is a huge difference between playing President and being President?
What short selective memories libs have... Obama Skipped 62.5 Percent of Intelligence Briefings this YearPresident Barack Obama has only attended roughly 40 percent of his daily intelligence briefings throughout his presidency, according to the Government Accountability Institute (GAI). According to the GAI report released Tuesday: In September 2014, the Government Accountability Institute updated an analysis of how much time President Barack Obama has spent attending his Presidential Daily Briefs (PDBs), as recorded on the White House official calendar and Politico’s comprehensive calendar. The updated study covered the president’s first 2,079 days in office, running from January 20, 2009 through September 29, 2014. Of those, President Obama attended a total of 875 Presidential Daily Briefs for an overall 42.09% attendance rate. The report also found President Obama’s attendance has declined slightly in his second term from 42.43 percent to 41.26 percent. In 2014, the president has only attended 37.5 percent of his briefings. Obama attended only eight in August, despite the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS). Real News Site The bogus claim that Obama 'skips’ his intelligence briefings
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-bogus-claim-that-obama-skips-his-intelligence-briefings/2012/09/22/100cb63e-04fc-11e2-8102-ebee9c66e190_blog.html?utm_term=.c060788adef7
And another Right Wing lie bites the dust. A poor way to excuse this shocking incompetence by President-elect Trump.
You can go now.
|
|
|
| |
|
peewee
|
Dec 11 2016, 01:47 AM
Post #23
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,946
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #218
- Joined:
- May 29, 2016
|
- Coast2coast
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Donald Trump taking intel briefings only once a week Washington (CNN)Donald Trump is getting the President's Daily Brief on average only once a week, according to a US official with knowledge of situation. President Barack Obama and other key national security policymakers currently receive the brief six days a week, according to the CIA website. http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/09/politics/intelligence-briefings-trump/index.html So who is right? If Trump is smart enough to get what he needs to know in 1 meeting why would he waste time meeting more than once? For all we know the meetings may be redundant. There can't be that much going on in the world on a daily basis that Trumps needs to know it all. Further, someone could be attending the meetings and then getting the Reader's Digest version to Trump each day. How would anyone know? And why should they care?
|
|
|
| |
|
estonianman
|
Dec 11 2016, 01:57 AM
Post #24
|
|
- Posts:
- 19,768
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #44
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
CNN is fake news.
|
|
MEEK AND MILD
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
Dec 11 2016, 02:31 AM
Post #25
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,270
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- peewee
- Dec 11 2016, 01:47 AM
- Coast2coast
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Donald Trump taking intel briefings only once a week Washington (CNN)Donald Trump is getting the President's Daily Brief on average only once a week, according to a US official with knowledge of situation. President Barack Obama and other key national security policymakers currently receive the brief six days a week, according to the CIA website. http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/09/politics/intelligence-briefings-trump/index.html
So who is right? If Trump is smart enough to get what he needs to know in 1 meeting why would he waste time meeting more than once? For all we know the meetings may be redundant. There can't be that much going on in the world on a daily basis that Trumps needs to know it all. Further, someone could be attending the meetings and then getting the Reader's Digest version to Trump each day. How would anyone know? And why should they care? If the CIA was honest about what they really know, they would ask to brief the President once a month............
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
clone
|
Dec 11 2016, 11:19 AM
Post #26
|
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
- Posts:
- 26,468
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #155
- Joined:
- Apr 4, 2016
|
- Coast2coast
- Dec 10 2016, 09:57 PM
- clone
- Dec 10 2016, 02:33 PM
- Coast2coast
- Dec 9 2016, 10:20 PM
He has got to be kidding! When is someone going to tell him there is a huge difference between playing President and being President?
What short selective memories libs have... Obama Skipped 62.5 Percent of Intelligence Briefings this YearPresident Barack Obama has only attended roughly 40 percent of his daily intelligence briefings throughout his presidency, according to the Government Accountability Institute (GAI). According to the GAI report released Tuesday: In September 2014, the Government Accountability Institute updated an analysis of how much time President Barack Obama has spent attending his Presidential Daily Briefs (PDBs), as recorded on the White House official calendar and Politico’s comprehensive calendar. The updated study covered the president’s first 2,079 days in office, running from January 20, 2009 through September 29, 2014. Of those, President Obama attended a total of 875 Presidential Daily Briefs for an overall 42.09% attendance rate. The report also found President Obama’s attendance has declined slightly in his second term from 42.43 percent to 41.26 percent. In 2014, the president has only attended 37.5 percent of his briefings. Obama attended only eight in August, despite the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS). Real News Site The bogus claim that Obama 'skips’ his intelligence briefingshttps://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-bogus-claim-that-obama-skips-his-intelligence-briefings/2012/09/22/100cb63e-04fc-11e2-8102-ebee9c66e190_blog.html?utm_term=.c060788adef7And another Right Wing lie bites the dust. A poor way to excuse this shocking incompetence by President-elect Trump. You can go now. Oh look a lib citing that fake news site Jeff Bezos blog....
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
|
| |
|
peewee
|
Dec 11 2016, 11:38 AM
Post #27
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,946
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #218
- Joined:
- May 29, 2016
|
- Robert Stout
- Dec 11 2016, 02:31 AM
- peewee
- Dec 11 2016, 01:47 AM
- Coast2coast
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Donald Trump taking intel briefings only once a week Washington (CNN)Donald Trump is getting the President's Daily Brief on average only once a week, according to a US official with knowledge of situation. President Barack Obama and other key national security policymakers currently receive the brief six days a week, according to the CIA website. http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/09/politics/intelligence-briefings-trump/index.html
So who is right? If Trump is smart enough to get what he needs to know in 1 meeting why would he waste time meeting more than once? For all we know the meetings may be redundant. There can't be that much going on in the world on a daily basis that Trumps needs to know it all. Further, someone could be attending the meetings and then getting the Reader's Digest version to Trump each day. How would anyone know? And why should they care?
If the CIA was honest about what they really know, they would ask to brief the President once a month............ I had read yesterday that Ronnie did not show up for 99% of his briefings. That true or not is not so important if this report is also not true.
|
|
|
| |
|
estonianman
|
Dec 11 2016, 11:59 AM
Post #28
|
|
- Posts:
- 19,768
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #44
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
Oh boy - of all things.
Will this finally stump the trump?
|
|
MEEK AND MILD
|
| |
|
peewee
|
Dec 11 2016, 01:31 PM
Post #29
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,946
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #218
- Joined:
- May 29, 2016
|
- peewee
- Dec 11 2016, 01:47 AM
- Coast2coast
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Donald Trump taking intel briefings only once a week Washington (CNN)Donald Trump is getting the President's Daily Brief on average only once a week, according to a US official with knowledge of situation. President Barack Obama and other key national security policymakers currently receive the brief six days a week, according to the CIA website. http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/09/politics/intelligence-briefings-trump/index.html
So who is right? If Trump is smart enough to get what he needs to know in 1 meeting why would he waste time meeting more than once? For all we know the meetings may be redundant. There can't be that much going on in the world on a daily basis that Trumps needs to know it all. Further, someone could be attending the meetings and then getting the Reader's Digest version to Trump each day. How would anyone know? And why should they care? http://www.aol.com/article/news/2016/12/11/trump-im-a-smart-person-dont-need-intelligence-briefings-e/21625229/
Like I said the other day and finally reported today. Smart enough and only wants to know if something has changed otherwise don't tell him the same thing every day.
|
|
|
| |
|
Attaburnsinhell
|
Dec 11 2016, 01:39 PM
Post #30
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,667
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #66
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Harambe4Trump
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Good. These are the same fools who missed 9/11 and told us wmds were in Iraq Wrong.
The CIA didnt come to Bush with info. The Bush Cheney neo-cons wanted a reason to invade Iraq and gave the CIA marching orders to find an excuse. The CIA brought back conflicting evidence, so they went outside the agency and cherry picked info from British, Russian and Iraqi dissident sources that resulted in basically a ''maybe, probably he does have WMD''. That was good enough for Tenant to tell them it was a ''slam dunk'' When weapons inspector Scott Ritter spoke up, saying they had it wrong, that there were no WMD, they didnt want to hear it
|
|
|
| |
|
Attaburnsinhell
|
Dec 11 2016, 01:49 PM
Post #31
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,667
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #66
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:39 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Good. These are the same fools who missed 9/11 and told us wmds were in Iraq
Wrong. The CIA didnt come to Bush with info. The Bush Cheney neo-cons wanted a reason to invade Iraq and gave the CIA marching orders to find an excuse. The CIA brought back conflicting evidence, so they went outside the agency and cherry picked info from British, Russian and Iraqi dissident sources that resulted in basically a ''maybe, probably he does have WMD''. That was good enough for Tenant to tell them it was a ''slam dunk'' When weapons inspector Scott Ritter spoke up, saying they had it wrong, that there were no WMD, they didnt want to hear it
As for 9/11
Bush was given information in a daily briefing, saying "'Bin Laden determined to attack the US''
Like Trump, he ignored it
|
|
|
| |
|
estonianman
|
Dec 11 2016, 02:45 PM
Post #32
|
|
- Posts:
- 19,768
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #44
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
Tomorrow on CNN:
"Trump takes a dump and uses toilet paper, what will Venezuelans think?"
|
|
MEEK AND MILD
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
Dec 11 2016, 02:55 PM
Post #33
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,270
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:49 PM
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:39 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Good. These are the same fools who missed 9/11 and told us wmds were in Iraq
Wrong. The CIA didnt come to Bush with info. The Bush Cheney neo-cons wanted a reason to invade Iraq and gave the CIA marching orders to find an excuse. The CIA brought back conflicting evidence, so they went outside the agency and cherry picked info from British, Russian and Iraqi dissident sources that resulted in basically a ''maybe, probably he does have WMD''. That was good enough for Tenant to tell them it was a ''slam dunk'' When weapons inspector Scott Ritter spoke up, saying they had it wrong, that there were no WMD, they didnt want to hear it
As for 9/11 Bush was given information in a daily briefing, saying "'Bin Laden determined to attack the US'' Like Trump, he ignored it There was no way Bin Laden was coming out of his retirement home alive....He suggested an attack, but he knew who planned and implemented the 9/11 attack from Saudi Arabia........... :oyvey
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
peewee
|
Dec 11 2016, 02:55 PM
Post #34
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,946
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #218
- Joined:
- May 29, 2016
|
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:49 PM
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:39 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Good. These are the same fools who missed 9/11 and told us wmds were in Iraq
Wrong. The CIA didnt come to Bush with info. The Bush Cheney neo-cons wanted a reason to invade Iraq and gave the CIA marching orders to find an excuse. The CIA brought back conflicting evidence, so they went outside the agency and cherry picked info from British, Russian and Iraqi dissident sources that resulted in basically a ''maybe, probably he does have WMD''. That was good enough for Tenant to tell them it was a ''slam dunk'' When weapons inspector Scott Ritter spoke up, saying they had it wrong, that there were no WMD, they didnt want to hear it
As for 9/11 Bush was given information in a daily briefing, saying "'Bin Laden determined to attack the US'' Like Trump, he ignored it I don't think that you worded it right. Trump was not briefed on 9/11 so he could not have ignored the intel. Bush may have ignored something but you have no idea Trump has ignored something.
|
|
|
| |
|
clone
|
Dec 11 2016, 02:55 PM
Post #35
|
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
- Posts:
- 26,468
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #155
- Joined:
- Apr 4, 2016
|
- estonianman
- Dec 11 2016, 02:45 PM
Tomorrow on CNN:
"Trump takes a dump and uses toilet paper, what will Venezuelans think?" If it was with 2 ply or more they would be insanely jealous....
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
|
| |
|
Attaburnsinhell
|
Dec 11 2016, 03:09 PM
Post #36
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,667
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #66
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- peewee
- Dec 11 2016, 02:55 PM
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:49 PM
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:39 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Good. These are the same fools who missed 9/11 and told us wmds were in Iraq
Wrong. The CIA didnt come to Bush with info. The Bush Cheney neo-cons wanted a reason to invade Iraq and gave the CIA marching orders to find an excuse. The CIA brought back conflicting evidence, so they went outside the agency and cherry picked info from British, Russian and Iraqi dissident sources that resulted in basically a ''maybe, probably he does have WMD''. That was good enough for Tenant to tell them it was a ''slam dunk'' When weapons inspector Scott Ritter spoke up, saying they had it wrong, that there were no WMD, they didnt want to hear it
As for 9/11 Bush was given information in a daily briefing, saying "'Bin Laden determined to attack the US'' Like Trump, he ignored it
I don't think that you worded it right. Trump was not briefed on 9/11 so he could not have ignored the intel. Bush may have ignored something but you have no idea Trump has ignored something. Obviously this flew over your head, so let me word it for you
Bush ignored his daily intell, like Trump is doing, so 9/11 happened. Bush preferred to go golfing, Trump prefers to jerk around on twitter
This is why we can expect another 9/11 sometime after Jan 19
|
|
|
| |
|
Attaburnsinhell
|
Dec 11 2016, 03:15 PM
Post #37
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,667
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #66
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Robert Stout
- Dec 11 2016, 02:55 PM
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:49 PM
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:39 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Good. These are the same fools who missed 9/11 and told us wmds were in Iraq
Wrong. The CIA didnt come to Bush with info. The Bush Cheney neo-cons wanted a reason to invade Iraq and gave the CIA marching orders to find an excuse. The CIA brought back conflicting evidence, so they went outside the agency and cherry picked info from British, Russian and Iraqi dissident sources that resulted in basically a ''maybe, probably he does have WMD''. That was good enough for Tenant to tell them it was a ''slam dunk'' When weapons inspector Scott Ritter spoke up, saying they had it wrong, that there were no WMD, they didnt want to hear it
As for 9/11 Bush was given information in a daily briefing, saying "'Bin Laden determined to attack the US'' Like Trump, he ignored it
There was no way Bin Laden was coming out of his retirement home alive....He suggested an attack, but he knew who planned and implemented the 9/11 attack from Saudi Arabia........... :oyvey Actually the planning was done by the hijackers themselves, under Kalid Sheik Mohammad's command. Bin Laden gave them the ok and the support from Afghanistan
|
|
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
Dec 11 2016, 03:59 PM
Post #38
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,270
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 03:15 PM
- Robert Stout
- Dec 11 2016, 02:55 PM
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:49 PM
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 11 2016, 01:39 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Dec 9 2016, 10:19 PM
Good. These are the same fools who missed 9/11 and told us wmds were in Iraq
Wrong. The CIA didnt come to Bush with info. The Bush Cheney neo-cons wanted a reason to invade Iraq and gave the CIA marching orders to find an excuse. The CIA brought back conflicting evidence, so they went outside the agency and cherry picked info from British, Russian and Iraqi dissident sources that resulted in basically a ''maybe, probably he does have WMD''. That was good enough for Tenant to tell them it was a ''slam dunk'' When weapons inspector Scott Ritter spoke up, saying they had it wrong, that there were no WMD, they didnt want to hear it
As for 9/11 Bush was given information in a daily briefing, saying "'Bin Laden determined to attack the US'' Like Trump, he ignored it
There was no way Bin Laden was coming out of his retirement home alive....He suggested an attack, but he knew who planned and implemented the 9/11 attack from Saudi Arabia........... :oyvey
Actually the planning was done by the hijackers themselves, under Kalid Sheik Mohammad's command. Bin Laden gave them the ok and the support from Afghanistan I was unable to find any Islamoterror attacks that Khalid Sheik Mohammad didn't confess to............. :oyvey
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Dec 11 2016, 04:02 PM
Post #39
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
In the meantime he continues to be Executive Producer of The Apprentice reality TV Show. True story.
Because...priorities...and he's real smart (his estimation)
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
Attaburnsinhell
|
Dec 11 2016, 04:14 PM
Post #40
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,667
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #66
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
You know, fine that he's asleep at the switch, so when something bad happens we know who to blame
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|