|
Liberals this is very simple — you lost because Hillary Clinton is objectively terrible
|
|
Topic Started: Dec 13 2016, 02:01 AM (1,567 Views)
|
|
CautionaryTales
|
Dec 14 2016, 01:37 PM
Post #41
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- Robert Stout
- Dec 14 2016, 11:58 AM
- ringotuna
- Dec 14 2016, 07:18 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 07:11 AM
- ringotuna
- Dec 14 2016, 06:17 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 13 2016, 05:09 PM
It doesn't matter anymore that Clinton lost. The focus should be on Putin's American Governor.
I hear he got high marks for appointing a friend of Vlads to the Sec o State job.
It seems to matter a great deal to the teeth gnashing hand wringing lefties who cannot accept reality.
I accept the reality. I think it will be clear soon enough that we (the people) made a big mistake. That's the reality.
While I do appreciate the snarky sarcasm in your bumper sticker >>> "Putin's American Governor" Such conclusions are not necessarily a reality. So long as you're on the "Putin Did it" band wagon, you're far from accepting the reality that your candidate was doomed to failure by her own actions.
CT's lack of faith in our democratic process is duly noted...I had more faith in the wisdom of the American people before the election, while Democrats assumed they could rig the system with more money, controlled media, and lies............ You are right in that I have lost faith in the American people. How effing more stupid can they be at this point? I reckon we will soon see.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
clone
|
Dec 14 2016, 01:42 PM
Post #42
|
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
- Posts:
- 26,359
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #155
- Joined:
- Apr 4, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 01:37 PM
- Robert Stout
- Dec 14 2016, 11:58 AM
- ringotuna
- Dec 14 2016, 07:18 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 07:11 AM
- ringotuna
- Dec 14 2016, 06:17 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
I accept the reality. I think it will be clear soon enough that we (the people) made a big mistake. That's the reality.
While I do appreciate the snarky sarcasm in your bumper sticker >>> "Putin's American Governor" Such conclusions are not necessarily a reality. So long as you're on the "Putin Did it" band wagon, you're far from accepting the reality that your candidate was doomed to failure by her own actions.
CT's lack of faith in our democratic process is duly noted...I had more faith in the wisdom of the American people before the election, while Democrats assumed they could rig the system with more money, controlled media, and lies............
You are right in that I have lost faith in the American people. How effing more stupid can they be at this point? I reckon we will soon see. Calling people stupid has worked out really well for the smirking class....might I humbly suggest you and your ilk keep up this winning strategy....perhaps even up the ante and call the deplorable....
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
|
| |
|
Right-Wing
|
Dec 14 2016, 01:45 PM
Post #43
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,653
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #118
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- clone
- Dec 14 2016, 01:36 PM
- _g R_
- Dec 14 2016, 01:33 PM
- Freaks
- Dec 13 2016, 03:57 AM
They REALLY shouldn't have pushed on her. I mean they had other choices that would have given them a lot better chance, why risk it?
Bernie would have killed Trump.
He definitely would have posed a bigger problem for Trump...and when the DNC conspired and colluded against Bernie , Trump was smart enough to make a plea for his supporters while team Hillary told his supporters to STFU and get in line...oddly a few like Atta...actually did.... Bernie would have gotten his ass handed to him worse than Hillary did. Hillary had the entire media complex behind her, the DNC behind her, the global elites behind her, foreign governments behind her and remnants from her husbands administration within our own government behind her and she still got Trumped! Do you really think Trump couldn't handle a kooky socialist with a much much much weaker support base behind him?
|
|
Donald Trump is Barack Obama's President!
|
| |
|
La Pasionaria
|
Dec 14 2016, 11:14 PM
Post #44
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,724
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2016
|
- Katoblue
- Dec 13 2016, 02:01 AM
Let's see what the Electors do!
:oyvey :oyvey
|
|
|
| |
|
jake58
|
Dec 14 2016, 11:16 PM
Post #45
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,341
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #47
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2016
|
- La Pasionaria
- Dec 14 2016, 11:14 PM
The only unknown is what straw you'll be grasping at after the electors confirm the results.
|
|
That which can be asserted without evidence; can be dismissed without evidence- Christopher Hitchens
|
| |
|
La Pasionaria
|
Dec 14 2016, 11:21 PM
Post #46
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,724
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2016
|
- Right-Wing
- Dec 14 2016, 01:45 PM
- clone
- Dec 14 2016, 01:36 PM
- _g R_
- Dec 14 2016, 01:33 PM
- Freaks
- Dec 13 2016, 03:57 AM
They REALLY shouldn't have pushed on her. I mean they had other choices that would have given them a lot better chance, why risk it?
Bernie would have killed Trump.
He definitely would have posed a bigger problem for Trump...and when the DNC conspired and colluded against Bernie , Trump was smart enough to make a plea for his supporters while team Hillary told his supporters to STFU and get in line...oddly a few like Atta...actually did....
Bernie would have gotten his ass handed to him worse than Hillary did. Hillary had the entire media complex behind her, the DNC behind her, the global elites behind her, foreign governments behind her and remnants from her husbands administration within our own government behind her and she still got Trumped! Do you really think Trump couldn't handle a kooky socialist with a much much much weaker support base behind him? Just a reminder: Trump's last press conference was 140 days ago.
During that press conference he encouraged Russia to hack Hillary's email.
|
|
|
| |
|
Right-Wing
|
Dec 14 2016, 11:22 PM
Post #47
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,653
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #118
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- La Pasionaria
- Dec 14 2016, 11:21 PM
- Right-Wing
- Dec 14 2016, 01:45 PM
- clone
- Dec 14 2016, 01:36 PM
- _g R_
- Dec 14 2016, 01:33 PM
- Freaks
- Dec 13 2016, 03:57 AM
They REALLY shouldn't have pushed on her. I mean they had other choices that would have given them a lot better chance, why risk it?
Bernie would have killed Trump.
He definitely would have posed a bigger problem for Trump...and when the DNC conspired and colluded against Bernie , Trump was smart enough to make a plea for his supporters while team Hillary told his supporters to STFU and get in line...oddly a few like Atta...actually did....
Bernie would have gotten his ass handed to him worse than Hillary did. Hillary had the entire media complex behind her, the DNC behind her, the global elites behind her, foreign governments behind her and remnants from her husbands administration within our own government behind her and she still got Trumped! Do you really think Trump couldn't handle a kooky socialist with a much much much weaker support base behind him?
Just a reminder: Trump's last press conference was 140 days ago. During that press conference he encouraged Russia to hack Hillary's email. When will the CIA make that hacking evidence available for Congress to see?
|
|
Donald Trump is Barack Obama's President!
|
| |
|
ringotuna
|
Dec 15 2016, 05:00 AM
Post #48
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,492
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #20
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 01:34 PM
- ringotuna
- Dec 14 2016, 07:18 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 07:11 AM
- ringotuna
- Dec 14 2016, 06:17 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 13 2016, 05:09 PM
It doesn't matter anymore that Clinton lost. The focus should be on Putin's American Governor.
I hear he got high marks for appointing a friend of Vlads to the Sec o State job.
It seems to matter a great deal to the teeth gnashing hand wringing lefties who cannot accept reality.
I accept the reality. I think it will be clear soon enough that we (the people) made a big mistake. That's the reality.
While I do appreciate the snarky sarcasm in your bumper sticker >>> "Putin's American Governor" Such conclusions are not necessarily a reality. So long as you're on the "Putin Did it" band wagon, you're far from accepting the reality that your candidate was doomed to failure by her own actions.
I am far less concerned with why Clinton lost and far more concerned about the connecting links that are showing up between Putin's American Governor' personal businesses and his Russian benefactor. That is a problem that we will all have to deal with in some form or fashion. That problem outstrips anything about Clinton. No surprise you'd want to put the Clinton Campaign Clusterfuk behind you.
|
|
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Dec 15 2016, 05:59 AM
Post #49
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- ringotuna
- Dec 15 2016, 05:00 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 01:34 PM
- ringotuna
- Dec 14 2016, 07:18 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 07:11 AM
- ringotuna
- Dec 14 2016, 06:17 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
I accept the reality. I think it will be clear soon enough that we (the people) made a big mistake. That's the reality.
While I do appreciate the snarky sarcasm in your bumper sticker >>> "Putin's American Governor" Such conclusions are not necessarily a reality. So long as you're on the "Putin Did it" band wagon, you're far from accepting the reality that your candidate was doomed to failure by her own actions.
I am far less concerned with why Clinton lost and far more concerned about the connecting links that are showing up between Putin's American Governor' personal businesses and his Russian benefactor. That is a problem that we will all have to deal with in some form or fashion. That problem outstrips anything about Clinton.
No surprise you'd want to put the Clinton Campaign Clusterfuk behind you. Fact is, she lost. Get over it.
There are much bigger problems in front of us now that Trump is going to be President than dissecting Clinton's loss.
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
ringotuna
|
Dec 15 2016, 06:35 AM
Post #50
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,492
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #20
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 15 2016, 05:59 AM
- ringotuna
- Dec 15 2016, 05:00 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 01:34 PM
- ringotuna
- Dec 14 2016, 07:18 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 07:11 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
While I do appreciate the snarky sarcasm in your bumper sticker >>> "Putin's American Governor" Such conclusions are not necessarily a reality. So long as you're on the "Putin Did it" band wagon, you're far from accepting the reality that your candidate was doomed to failure by her own actions.
I am far less concerned with why Clinton lost and far more concerned about the connecting links that are showing up between Putin's American Governor' personal businesses and his Russian benefactor. That is a problem that we will all have to deal with in some form or fashion. That problem outstrips anything about Clinton.
No surprise you'd want to put the Clinton Campaign Clusterfuk behind you.
Fact is, she lost. Get over it. There are much bigger problems in front of us now that Trump is going to be President than dissecting Clinton's loss.
- Quote:
-
There are much bigger problems in front of us now that Trump is going to be President than dissecting Clinton's loss. .
I see you're trying to hijack my position here as well.
As for Clinton's clusterfuk of a campaign. Well, there's nothing wrong with a little Monday morning quarterbacking. Especially while libs are anguished by the loss and blaming everything in the world except their own incompetence.
|
|
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
|
| |
|
Deleted User
|
Dec 15 2016, 06:37 AM
Post #51
|
|
Deleted User
|
- _g R_
- Dec 14 2016, 01:33 PM
Bernie would have killed Trump. Easy to say, impossible to prove; pure conjecture. Fortunately for the exceptionally, chronically smug, they'll never have a chance to be proven wrong. Never ever have seen so many say 'I told you so' without actually winning themselves.
|
|
|
| |
|
ringotuna
|
Dec 15 2016, 07:25 AM
Post #52
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,492
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #20
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- clone
- Dec 14 2016, 01:42 PM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 01:37 PM
- Robert Stout
- Dec 14 2016, 11:58 AM
- ringotuna
- Dec 14 2016, 07:18 AM
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 14 2016, 07:11 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
While I do appreciate the snarky sarcasm in your bumper sticker >>> "Putin's American Governor" Such conclusions are not necessarily a reality. So long as you're on the "Putin Did it" band wagon, you're far from accepting the reality that your candidate was doomed to failure by her own actions.
CT's lack of faith in our democratic process is duly noted...I had more faith in the wisdom of the American people before the election, while Democrats assumed they could rig the system with more money, controlled media, and lies............
You are right in that I have lost faith in the American people. How effing more stupid can they be at this point? I reckon we will soon see.
Calling people stupid has worked out really well for the smirking class....might I humbly suggest you and your ilk keep up this winning strategy....perhaps even up the ante and call the deplorable....
|
|
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
|
| |
|
ringotuna
|
Dec 15 2016, 07:36 AM
Post #53
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,492
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #20
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 15 2016, 05:59 AM
Fact is, she lost. Get over it.
There are much bigger problems in front of us now that Trump is going to be President than dissecting Clinton's loss.
I would suggest you try to follow your own advice here Mr. Do As I Say, Not As I Do... Just sayin....
- CautionaryTales
- Dec 13 2016, 06:35 AM
Clinton lost the election because she took it for granted that she would win a general election against Trump. She (like me) undersetimated the stupidity of "we the people". It was a fatal mistake. She should have assumed that we (the people) are the dumbest clucks in the barnyard. Then she would have won. That is what Trump did and he won. She didn't take Sanders for granted and she did the things necessary to win the primary.
That's the difference and that was her fault. She got weak advice and she made some critical mistakes. Then she was attacked by an unscrupulous opponent (Trump) that took full advantage of the opportunity to beat her.
That unscrupulous opponent would not have treated Sanders any gentler than he treated Clinton. He would have been unfairly barbecued just as she was.
If you think that Sanders wouldn't have been lied about as Clinton was, you are wrong...100% dead wrong.
|
|
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
|
| |
|
Attaburnsinhell
|
Dec 15 2016, 08:13 AM
Post #54
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,667
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #66
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
All the ingredients for the next big recession are being thrown in the mix Trumpanzees are all giddy, just like the bushbots were in 2001.
Here's what to expect
Trump and the repubs will cut taxes for the rich, some chump change to the middle class. The economy gets flooded with cash, but the deficit get's HUGE at the same time The economy heats up at 4, 5, maybe even 6% growth over the next two to three years Real estate values, stock market, tech investments. Manufacturers fill the shelves, produce like mad
Then it all starts to fall Everything is overvalued, foreclosures, stocks dumped Inventories overstocked, unemployment rises Banks need another bailout, this time no dice Repubs shredded the national safety net, thinking the good times would last forever
That's what they thought in 1928, again in 2006
By 2019 it all collapses
|
|
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Dec 15 2016, 09:44 AM
Post #55
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,685
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
Actually, I agree with the premise of the Thread, you Democrats couldn't have picked a worse candidate, on optics alone you should have avoided her like the plague. Granted, she's formidable, 30 years of being vetting, and scandal-ridden might have given her the temerity to stay "in the game", but more and more, I'm starting to think you might have gone with Bernie. Granted Bernie would have been smothered by Trump most likely still.
|
|
|
| |
|
Attaburnsinhell
|
Dec 15 2016, 09:46 AM
Post #56
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,667
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #66
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Dec 15 2016, 09:44 AM
Actually, I agree with the premise of the Thread, you Democrats couldn't have picked a worse candidate, on optics alone you should have avoided her like the plague. Granted, she's formidable, 30 years of being vetting, and scandal-ridden might have given her the temerity to stay "in the game", but more and more, I'm starting to think you might have gone with Bernie. Granted Bernie would have been smothered by Trump most likely still. Bernie challenged Trump to a debate, Trump chickened out
Trump was scared of that smart little jewish guy because he had nothing on him, couldnt call him crooked.
|
|
|
| |
|
ringotuna
|
Dec 15 2016, 09:48 AM
Post #57
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,492
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #20
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Dec 15 2016, 09:44 AM
Actually, I agree with the premise of the Thread, you Democrats couldn't have picked a worse candidate, on optics alone you should have avoided her like the plague. Granted, she's formidable, 30 years of being vetting, and scandal-ridden might have given her the temerity to stay "in the game", but more and more, I'm starting to think you might have gone with Bernie. Granted Bernie would have been smothered by Trump most likely still. Good point T. Arrogance and Hubris contributed to her dismal failure.
|
|
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Dec 15 2016, 10:08 AM
Post #58
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,685
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 15 2016, 09:46 AM
- Tsalagi
- Dec 15 2016, 09:44 AM
Actually, I agree with the premise of the Thread, you Democrats couldn't have picked a worse candidate, on optics alone you should have avoided her like the plague. Granted, she's formidable, 30 years of being vetting, and scandal-ridden might have given her the temerity to stay "in the game", but more and more, I'm starting to think you might have gone with Bernie. Granted Bernie would have been smothered by Trump most likely still.
Bernie challenged Trump to a debate, Trump chickened out Trump was scared of that smart little jewish guy because he had nothing on him, couldnt call him crooked. Why give up anything to a guy who isn't going to go to the finish line?
|
|
|
| |
|
PATruth
|
Dec 15 2016, 03:32 PM
Post #59
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,213
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #271
- Joined:
- Jul 6, 2016
|
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 15 2016, 09:46 AM
- Tsalagi
- Dec 15 2016, 09:44 AM
Actually, I agree with the premise of the Thread, you Democrats couldn't have picked a worse candidate, on optics alone you should have avoided her like the plague. Granted, she's formidable, 30 years of being vetting, and scandal-ridden might have given her the temerity to stay "in the game", but more and more, I'm starting to think you might have gone with Bernie. Granted Bernie would have been smothered by Trump most likely still.
Bernie challenged Trump to a debate, Trump chickened out Trump was scared of that smart little jewish guy because he had nothing on him, couldnt call him crooked. Why would Trump take a whining little bitch like Sanders seriously? From what I've heard he never held a real job until he was in his forties, even then it was a government job. He's your typical socialist, never made a damn thing in his life yet he thinks he deserves half of what others produce.
I suggest the democrats fix the 2020 election for Bernie. It would be justice after the 2016 rigged election.
|
"No. No he won't. We'll stop it."
|
| |
|
Attaburnsinhell
|
Dec 15 2016, 08:47 PM
Post #60
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,667
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #66
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- PATruth
- Dec 15 2016, 03:32 PM
- Attaburnsinhell
- Dec 15 2016, 09:46 AM
- Tsalagi
- Dec 15 2016, 09:44 AM
Actually, I agree with the premise of the Thread, you Democrats couldn't have picked a worse candidate, on optics alone you should have avoided her like the plague. Granted, she's formidable, 30 years of being vetting, and scandal-ridden might have given her the temerity to stay "in the game", but more and more, I'm starting to think you might have gone with Bernie. Granted Bernie would have been smothered by Trump most likely still.
Bernie challenged Trump to a debate, Trump chickened out Trump was scared of that smart little jewish guy because he had nothing on him, couldnt call him crooked.
Why would Trump take a whining little bitch like Sanders seriously? From what I've heard he never held a real job until he was in his forties, even then it was a government job. He's your typical socialist, never made a damn thing in his life yet he thinks he deserves half of what others produce. I suggest the democrats fix the 2020 election for Bernie. It would be justice after the 2016 rigged election. Trump contacted Putin on his Russian hotline, Putin said he couldn't help him with Sanders, advised him to avoid him at all costs
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|