Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Is There A Loophole That Could Actually Keep Obama In The White House?; The delusional left keeps grasping at straws
Topic Started: Dec 14 2016, 01:23 PM (559 Views)
PATruth
Member Avatar

CautionaryTales
Dec 14 2016, 05:52 PM
PATruth
Dec 14 2016, 05:39 PM
CautionaryTales
Dec 14 2016, 04:42 PM
PATruth
Dec 14 2016, 03:59 PM
CautionaryTales
Dec 14 2016, 03:23 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
"The Times reported in an explosive piece on Thursday that Canadian records show the chairman of Russian-owned Uranium One gave over $2 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation, which the Clintons’ didn’t disclose. At the same time, Russia pushed for control of a Canadian Uranium company.

A Kremlin-connected bank promoting stock in the company also reportedly paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech in Moscow. Eventually, the Russian-Canadian uranium deal was approved."

Relax, everything will work out. At least we didn't elect Putin's puppet.
Putin got his puppet elected. :biggrin:
Clinton was the only candidate in the last election that took Russian money in exchange for favorable legislation. If Tump has taken foreign money in exchange for favorable legislation please let us know.
That's an allegation. A stretch at that.
If we had the same transparency of Trumps business dealing with the Russians that the Clinton Foundation has volunteered, we would be seeing a full picture of his finances.
You don't want that.
Allegations supported by millions of dollars "coincidentally" passing from the Russians and a wealthy Canadian to the Clinton's "coincidentally" at a time they both had business before the state department.

I am more than willing to listen to your argument, tell me what Tump received or did for the Russians in exchange for money? Links would be nice.

I'll keep an open mind....
"No. No he won't. We'll stop it."
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
BuckFan

PATruth
Dec 14 2016, 05:58 PM
CautionaryTales
Dec 14 2016, 05:52 PM
PATruth
Dec 14 2016, 05:39 PM
CautionaryTales
Dec 14 2016, 04:42 PM
PATruth
Dec 14 2016, 03:59 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Putin got his puppet elected. :biggrin:
Clinton was the only candidate in the last election that took Russian money in exchange for favorable legislation. If Tump has taken foreign money in exchange for favorable legislation please let us know.
That's an allegation. A stretch at that.
If we had the same transparency of Trumps business dealing with the Russians that the Clinton Foundation has volunteered, we would be seeing a full picture of his finances.
You don't want that.
Allegations supported by millions of dollars "coincidentally" passing from the Russians and a wealthy Canadian to the Clinton's "coincidentally" at a time they both had business before the state department.

I am more than willing to listen to your argument, tell me what Tump received or did for the Russians in exchange for money? Links would be nice.

I'll keep an open mind....
No you won't
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
PATruth
Member Avatar

BuckFan
Dec 14 2016, 06:03 PM
PATruth
Dec 14 2016, 05:58 PM
CautionaryTales
Dec 14 2016, 05:52 PM
PATruth
Dec 14 2016, 05:39 PM
CautionaryTales
Dec 14 2016, 04:42 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Clinton was the only candidate in the last election that took Russian money in exchange for favorable legislation. If Tump has taken foreign money in exchange for favorable legislation please let us know.
That's an allegation. A stretch at that.
If we had the same transparency of Trumps business dealing with the Russians that the Clinton Foundation has volunteered, we would be seeing a full picture of his finances.
You don't want that.
Allegations supported by millions of dollars "coincidentally" passing from the Russians and a wealthy Canadian to the Clinton's "coincidentally" at a time they both had business before the state department.

I am more than willing to listen to your argument, tell me what Tump received or did for the Russians in exchange for money? Links would be nice.

I'll keep an open mind....
No you won't
Present your evidence, you have my full attention...
"No. No he won't. We'll stop it."
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · UnitedStates.com DOMESTIC U.S. news · Next Topic »
Add Reply