Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
So I guess leftists are dropping this Russians caused Clinton to lose excuse?
No patriot should not seek the complete investigation of Russian interference with our elections.
If that leaves out President Trump and his supporters so be it.
So you basically have no evidence of Russian interference
You have a history as has been pointed out of playing silly and childish troll games around evidence.
Oh, which reminds me... how's that evidence coming of my 2003 comments?
Asking you to support your claims is now trolling. Pathetic.
and your dodging of the following question is more than enough evidence.
Did you support the intelligence agencies who provided evidence of WMDs in Iraq?
Cheney and Rumsfeld had their own intel dept. and whatever intel they got from the CIA was filtered and only the info that supported their narrative was bumped up.
You may be a conservative republican..if you are pro life until you get your mistress knocked up
Absolutely - sharing debate questions between CNN and the DNC was bad.
It was much worse than just that.....
I don't know if it gets any worse than subverting the election process.
But hacking into private emails and releasing them to influence an election isn't? What if Trump was on the ass end of this..some hacker gets his tax returns or something and releases them and the info contributes to him losing...somehow, I doubt that you would be ok with that.
So I guess leftists are dropping this Russians caused Clinton to lose excuse?
No patriot should not seek the complete investigation of Russian interference with our elections.
If that leaves out President Trump and his supporters so be it.
So you basically have no evidence of Russian interference
You have a history as has been pointed out of playing silly and childish troll games around evidence.
Oh, which reminds me... how's that evidence coming of my 2003 comments?
Asking you to support your claims is now trolling. Pathetic.
and your dodging of the following question is more than enough evidence.
Did you support the intelligence agencies who provided evidence of WMDs in Iraq?
"You lie!"
You made a claim that I said "X". I asked for your "evidence" of what you "factually" claimed I made. Until you back up your comment or admit you made it up (lied) and have no such basis for your statement you will be called out when you play your boring and childish evidence game.
So, is evidence coming soon or will it be your admission of a lie so we can move on?
I don't know if it gets any worse than subverting the election process.
But hacking into private emails and releasing them to influence an election isn't? What if Trump was on the ass end of this..some hacker gets his tax returns or something and releases them and the info contributes to him losing...somehow, I doubt that you would be ok with that.
I don't know if it gets any worse than subverting the election process.
But hacking into private emails and releasing them to influence an election isn't? What if Trump was on the ass end of this..some hacker gets his tax returns or something and releases them and the info contributes to him losing...somehow, I doubt that you would be ok with that.
You were appalled I'm sure that these private documents were published without his consent.
I wasn't even aware of this I am not "appalled" as much as I am merely pointing out some double standards here..don't be so defensive
What crawled up your butt, anyway? You have been extra cranky as of late.
What about that was cranky? I am also pointing out double standards. You suggested that Trump had not been on the receiving end of an unfortunate leak and I provided an example. I tend to be direct, if that's a failing for you, so be it.
That which can be asserted without evidence; can be dismissed without evidence- Christopher Hitchens
So you basically have no evidence of Russian interference
You have a history as has been pointed out of playing silly and childish troll games around evidence.
Oh, which reminds me... how's that evidence coming of my 2003 comments?
Asking you to support your claims is now trolling. Pathetic.
and your dodging of the following question is more than enough evidence.
Did you support the intelligence agencies who provided evidence of WMDs in Iraq?
"You lie!"
You made a claim that I said "X". I asked for your "evidence" of what you "factually" claimed I made. Until you back up your comment or admit you made it up (lied) and have no such basis for your statement you will be called out when you play your boring and childish evidence game.
So, is evidence coming soon or will it be your admission of a lie so we can move on?
Your omission is evidence.
MEEKANDMILD
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)