Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
No Muslims From Terror Hot Beds: Period!
Topic Started: Jan 28 2017, 08:44 PM (1,050 Views)
nNeo

None of the countries where the 9/11 terrorists came from are on the ban list. No acts of terrorism have been committed in the US by many of the countries that are on the ban list. No Americans have been killed by any of them. it's a misguided policy.

Most Muslims are no more dangerous than anyone else, and we've been vetting the ones from terrorist-prone areas quite well since at least 2011 when Obama temporarily restricted travel from those areas to increase screening, which everyone now seems to have forgotten. This will drive a wedge between the US and normal Muslims, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. The best counter to radicals is to support the moderate majority against them.
Edited by nNeo, Jan 29 2017, 01:27 PM.
“Strong people don’t need strong leaders.”
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Harambe4Trump
Member Avatar

nNeo
Jan 29 2017, 01:13 PM
None of the countries where the 9/11 terrorists came from are on the ban list. No acts of terrorism have been committed in the US by many of the countries that are on the ban list. No Americans have been killed by any of them. it's a misguided policy.

Most Muslims are no more dangerous than anyone else, and we've been vetting the ones from terrorist-prone areas quite well since at least 2011 when Obama temporarily restricted travel from those areas to increase screening, which everyone now seems to have forgotten. This will drive a wedge between the US and normal Muslims, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. The best counter to radicals is to support the moderate majority against them.
Japan's strategy has been far more effective.
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary.
#MAGA
#wallsnotwars
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Harambe4Trump
Jan 29 2017, 02:16 PM
nNeo
Jan 29 2017, 01:13 PM
None of the countries where the 9/11 terrorists came from are on the ban list. No acts of terrorism have been committed in the US by many of the countries that are on the ban list. No Americans have been killed by any of them. it's a misguided policy.

Most Muslims are no more dangerous than anyone else, and we've been vetting the ones from terrorist-prone areas quite well since at least 2011 when Obama temporarily restricted travel from those areas to increase screening, which everyone now seems to have forgotten. This will drive a wedge between the US and normal Muslims, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. The best counter to radicals is to support the moderate majority against them.
Japan's strategy has been far more effective.
Until they convert more in Japan, they don't have to emigrate, they have a sizable minority now in the country.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
StillCrazy1
Member Avatar
!!!!
I_feel_the_trump
Jan 28 2017, 08:44 PM
Islam needs major reformations. Why should the West tolerate Islamic Terror?

It's up to the Muslim world to prove they are not a threat

in other words guilty till proven innocent. How American of you.
Ever notice the only 2 people Trump refuses to speak ill of are Stormy Daniels and Vladimir Putin?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mr. Tik
Member Avatar

nNeo
Jan 29 2017, 01:13 PM
None of the countries where the 9/11 terrorists came from are on the ban list. No acts of terrorism have been committed in the US by many of the countries that are on the ban list. No Americans have been killed by any of them. it's a misguided policy.

Most Muslims are no more dangerous than anyone else, and we've been vetting the ones from terrorist-prone areas quite well since at least 2011 when Obama temporarily restricted travel from those areas to increase screening, which everyone now seems to have forgotten. This will drive a wedge between the US and normal Muslims, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. The best counter to radicals is to support the moderate majority against them.
yep
You may be a conservative republican..if you are pro life until you get your mistress knocked up
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robert Stout
Member Avatar

CautionaryTales
Jan 29 2017, 08:13 AM
thoughtless
Jan 29 2017, 08:09 AM
Correction, it wasn't about religious persecution.
It has become ridiculous
These people are turning their backs on the very reason we exist in the first place.
It is sickening to me.
Perhaps we want to try beheadings and sex slaves....Real religious persecution does have its high points............. :dunno:
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robert Stout
Member Avatar

Adolph Hipster
Jan 30 2017, 05:35 AM
nNeo
Jan 29 2017, 01:13 PM
None of the countries where the 9/11 terrorists came from are on the ban list. No acts of terrorism have been committed in the US by many of the countries that are on the ban list. No Americans have been killed by any of them. it's a misguided policy.

Most Muslims are no more dangerous than anyone else, and we've been vetting the ones from terrorist-prone areas quite well since at least 2011 when Obama temporarily restricted travel from those areas to increase screening, which everyone now seems to have forgotten. This will drive a wedge between the US and normal Muslims, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. The best counter to radicals is to support the moderate majority against them.
yep
I see no need for America to justify why we don't want some people coming to our country....It should be good enough to just say no to primitives wanting to come to America....Now that we have been freed from the shackles of Obama, citizens have the right to pick and choose....My choice is that we take in ZERO refugees from anywhere in the world...I don't believe in adopting pet hamsters.......... :usa:
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Harambe4Trump
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jan 29 2017, 03:08 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 29 2017, 02:16 PM
nNeo
Jan 29 2017, 01:13 PM
None of the countries where the 9/11 terrorists came from are on the ban list. No acts of terrorism have been committed in the US by many of the countries that are on the ban list. No Americans have been killed by any of them. it's a misguided policy.

Most Muslims are no more dangerous than anyone else, and we've been vetting the ones from terrorist-prone areas quite well since at least 2011 when Obama temporarily restricted travel from those areas to increase screening, which everyone now seems to have forgotten. This will drive a wedge between the US and normal Muslims, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. The best counter to radicals is to support the moderate majority against them.
Japan's strategy has been far more effective.
Until they convert more in Japan, they don't have to emigrate, they have a sizable minority now in the country.
Fewer than 100,000 in a nation of 126,000,000 is hardly sizable.
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary.
#MAGA
#wallsnotwars
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Harambe4Trump
Member Avatar

Adolph Hipster
Jan 30 2017, 05:35 AM
nNeo
Jan 29 2017, 01:13 PM
None of the countries where the 9/11 terrorists came from are on the ban list. No acts of terrorism have been committed in the US by many of the countries that are on the ban list. No Americans have been killed by any of them. it's a misguided policy.

Most Muslims are no more dangerous than anyone else, and we've been vetting the ones from terrorist-prone areas quite well since at least 2011 when Obama temporarily restricted travel from those areas to increase screening, which everyone now seems to have forgotten. This will drive a wedge between the US and normal Muslims, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. The best counter to radicals is to support the moderate majority against them.
yep
No, that's precisely what should happen. Clarity will be like the sun.
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary.
#MAGA
#wallsnotwars
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Alt Right PEPE
Member Avatar

The executive order states, “The United States cannot, and should not, admit those who do not support the Constitution, or those who would place violent ideologies over American law.”
We Will Gnaw on ANTIFA Skulls
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Alt Right PEPE
Member Avatar

Adolph Hipster
Jan 30 2017, 05:35 AM
nNeo
Jan 29 2017, 01:13 PM
None of the countries where the 9/11 terrorists came from are on the ban list. No acts of terrorism have been committed in the US by many of the countries that are on the ban list. No Americans have been killed by any of them. it's a misguided policy.

Most Muslims are no more dangerous than anyone else, and we've been vetting the ones from terrorist-prone areas quite well since at least 2011 when Obama temporarily restricted travel from those areas to increase screening, which everyone now seems to have forgotten. This will drive a wedge between the US and normal Muslims, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. The best counter to radicals is to support the moderate majority against them.
yep
After the mass slaughters (as in plural) in France, and the Christmas village attack in Berlin (ya know, running over women and children and grandparents with a semi truck while yelling Allah Acbar!), I didn't see any mass marches and protest from the worldwide muslim communities...


????
Gee, I wonder why?

:dunno: :confused:
We Will Gnaw on ANTIFA Skulls
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Harambe4Trump
Jan 30 2017, 09:45 AM
Tsalagi
Jan 29 2017, 03:08 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 29 2017, 02:16 PM
nNeo
Jan 29 2017, 01:13 PM
None of the countries where the 9/11 terrorists came from are on the ban list. No acts of terrorism have been committed in the US by many of the countries that are on the ban list. No Americans have been killed by any of them. it's a misguided policy.

Most Muslims are no more dangerous than anyone else, and we've been vetting the ones from terrorist-prone areas quite well since at least 2011 when Obama temporarily restricted travel from those areas to increase screening, which everyone now seems to have forgotten. This will drive a wedge between the US and normal Muslims, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. The best counter to radicals is to support the moderate majority against them.
Japan's strategy has been far more effective.
Until they convert more in Japan, they don't have to emigrate, they have a sizable minority now in the country.
Fewer than 100,000 in a nation of 126,000,000 is hardly sizable.
It took less then a dozen to kill 3000 US citizens, and they didn't even have a gun. And they have over 100,000, and you don't think at some point they may not be radicalized?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Harambe4Trump
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jan 30 2017, 01:09 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 30 2017, 09:45 AM
Tsalagi
Jan 29 2017, 03:08 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 29 2017, 02:16 PM
nNeo
Jan 29 2017, 01:13 PM
None of the countries where the 9/11 terrorists came from are on the ban list. No acts of terrorism have been committed in the US by many of the countries that are on the ban list. No Americans have been killed by any of them. it's a misguided policy.

Most Muslims are no more dangerous than anyone else, and we've been vetting the ones from terrorist-prone areas quite well since at least 2011 when Obama temporarily restricted travel from those areas to increase screening, which everyone now seems to have forgotten. This will drive a wedge between the US and normal Muslims, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. The best counter to radicals is to support the moderate majority against them.
Japan's strategy has been far more effective.
Until they convert more in Japan, they don't have to emigrate, they have a sizable minority now in the country.
Fewer than 100,000 in a nation of 126,000,000 is hardly sizable.
It took less then a dozen to kill 3000 US citizens, and they didn't even have a gun. And they have over 100,000, and you don't think at some point they may not be radicalized?
Excellent argument to ban their immigration and not let that number reach the millions.
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary.
#MAGA
#wallsnotwars
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
CautionaryTales
Member Avatar

Harambe4Trump
Jan 29 2017, 08:31 AM
CautionaryTales
Jan 29 2017, 08:13 AM
thoughtless
Jan 29 2017, 08:09 AM
Correction, it wasn't about religious persecution.
It has become ridiculous
These people are turning their backs on the very reason we exist in the first place.
It is sickening to me.
In fact this country got its start in rage of religious passion. Reread on the Salem Witch Trials and then lie again about the reason this country exists.
Yes witch burning is one of those things that guys like you go for.
Edited by CautionaryTales, Jan 30 2017, 01:19 PM.


Have you paid your internet taxes?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Harambe4Trump
Jan 30 2017, 01:17 PM
Tsalagi
Jan 30 2017, 01:09 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 30 2017, 09:45 AM
Tsalagi
Jan 29 2017, 03:08 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 29 2017, 02:16 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Until they convert more in Japan, they don't have to emigrate, they have a sizable minority now in the country.
Fewer than 100,000 in a nation of 126,000,000 is hardly sizable.
It took less then a dozen to kill 3000 US citizens, and they didn't even have a gun. And they have over 100,000, and you don't think at some point they may not be radicalized?
Excellent argument to ban their immigration and not let that number reach the millions.
It took 1 US militia member to blow up a federal building in Oklahoma, perhaps we should outlaw paramilitary organizations with the stated purpose of opposing the Federal Government?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Harambe4Trump
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jan 30 2017, 01:22 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 30 2017, 01:17 PM
Tsalagi
Jan 30 2017, 01:09 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 30 2017, 09:45 AM
Tsalagi
Jan 29 2017, 03:08 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Fewer than 100,000 in a nation of 126,000,000 is hardly sizable.
It took less then a dozen to kill 3000 US citizens, and they didn't even have a gun. And they have over 100,000, and you don't think at some point they may not be radicalized?
Excellent argument to ban their immigration and not let that number reach the millions.
It took 1 US militia member to blow up a federal building in Oklahoma, perhaps we should outlaw paramilitary organizations with the stated purpose of opposing the Federal Government?
Probably.
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary.
#MAGA
#wallsnotwars
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
CautionaryTales
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jan 30 2017, 01:22 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 30 2017, 01:17 PM
Tsalagi
Jan 30 2017, 01:09 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 30 2017, 09:45 AM
Tsalagi
Jan 29 2017, 03:08 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Fewer than 100,000 in a nation of 126,000,000 is hardly sizable.
It took less then a dozen to kill 3000 US citizens, and they didn't even have a gun. And they have over 100,000, and you don't think at some point they may not be radicalized?
Excellent argument to ban their immigration and not let that number reach the millions.
It took 1 US militia member to blow up a federal building in Oklahoma, perhaps we should outlaw paramilitary organizations with the stated purpose of opposing the Federal Government?
:hooray:


Have you paid your internet taxes?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
PATruth
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jan 30 2017, 01:22 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 30 2017, 01:17 PM
Tsalagi
Jan 30 2017, 01:09 PM
Harambe4Trump
Jan 30 2017, 09:45 AM
Tsalagi
Jan 29 2017, 03:08 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Fewer than 100,000 in a nation of 126,000,000 is hardly sizable.
It took less then a dozen to kill 3000 US citizens, and they didn't even have a gun. And they have over 100,000, and you don't think at some point they may not be radicalized?
Excellent argument to ban their immigration and not let that number reach the millions.
It took 1 US militia member to blow up a federal building in Oklahoma, perhaps we should outlaw paramilitary organizations with the stated purpose of opposing the Federal Government?
Completely ridiculous point. Comparing two lone anti-government terrorists to radical Islam, a well organized, well funded global terror network that has killed hundreds of thousands of people is beyond absurd.
"No. No he won't. We'll stop it."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
clone
Member Avatar
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
What's a "normal Muslim"????


:popcorn:

Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dr345
Member Avatar

I_feel_the_trump
Jan 28 2017, 08:44 PM
Islam needs major reformations. Why should the West tolerate Islamic Terror?

It's up to the Muslim world to prove they are not a threat.

I prefer this President act on the side of caution.

American citizens have rights too!

Posted Image
un jour on se souviendra de ca comme on se souvient de ca
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply