Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Family of Syrians Deported From Philadelphia Voted for Donald Trump; Haha
Topic Started: Jan 31 2017, 05:34 PM (1,750 Views)
Drudge X
Member Avatar

Why won't leftists thank Obama for this ban?
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

I_feel_the_trump
Feb 1 2017, 12:43 PM
The safety of american citizens is the priority here. No one promised you a Rose Garden!

Get it like ya live: HARD!

"life is a bitch, then you die" :wah: :wah: :wah:
And now we are more hated and less safe.

You along with this couple voted to make it such.



Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 12:45 PM
clone
Feb 1 2017, 12:20 PM
estonianman
Feb 1 2017, 10:29 AM
How did someone with citizenship get deported?
Posted Image
The citizens were not sent home. Their non-citizen brothers and families were.

Quote:
 
Assali and her husband, Dr. Ghassan Assali, who has a dentistry practice and received his degree from New York University, are originally from Syria but have been living in the United States for 20 years.
Assali's two brothers, their wives and their two children initiated their immigration attempts in 2003 while living in Syria. In December 2016, they were approved to join Assali and her husband in Allentown after the couple bought and furnished a home for them.


I can see where the headline might confuse you though.

See, this is a case where they should not have been sent back. These folks were in the air before the order was signed and had valid visas that they had been trying to get for years. Hopefully this can get cleared up quickly and they can return since it is rather obvious that the brother is doing what he can to make them not a burden to the state.

It is fun to see our democrat friends shit on some immigrants who did nothing wrong though. Why are they hating on these poor people? They hate them because their brother had the audacity to vote for someone other than Clinton. Nice.
Don't hate anyone. I Just don't feel sorry for people that made an irresponsible choice that harms all of us (particularly when the intended harm was announced, promoted and rallied on) that then start whining when they get harmed.







Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Demagogue
Member Avatar
Administrator
Coast2coast
Feb 1 2017, 05:39 PM
Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 12:45 PM
clone
Feb 1 2017, 12:20 PM
estonianman
Feb 1 2017, 10:29 AM
How did someone with citizenship get deported?
Posted Image
The citizens were not sent home. Their non-citizen brothers and families were.

Quote:
 
Assali and her husband, Dr. Ghassan Assali, who has a dentistry practice and received his degree from New York University, are originally from Syria but have been living in the United States for 20 years.
Assali's two brothers, their wives and their two children initiated their immigration attempts in 2003 while living in Syria. In December 2016, they were approved to join Assali and her husband in Allentown after the couple bought and furnished a home for them.


I can see where the headline might confuse you though.

See, this is a case where they should not have been sent back. These folks were in the air before the order was signed and had valid visas that they had been trying to get for years. Hopefully this can get cleared up quickly and they can return since it is rather obvious that the brother is doing what he can to make them not a burden to the state.

It is fun to see our democrat friends shit on some immigrants who did nothing wrong though. Why are they hating on these poor people? They hate them because their brother had the audacity to vote for someone other than Clinton. Nice.
Don't hate anyone. I Just don't feel sorry for people that made an irresponsible choice that harms all of us (particularly when the intended harm was announced, promoted and rallied on) that then start whining when they get harmed.







The citizens who voted were not the one's that were harmed. It was their non-voting, legal immigrant relatives who were harmed.
People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to visit violence on those who would do them harm.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 01:45 PM
CautionaryTales
Feb 1 2017, 01:40 PM
Truth is that these folks voted for what they got. There are millions of others that voted for the guy too. A number of our posters here are part of that bunch.
Now it might be their turn to get hosed by this guy and that are getting a little nervous about that.

Oh well.
Oh, I get not having sympathy for the brother who is a US citizen. I am just at a loss as to how the left can cry a river and march in the streets over the 109 folks who were turned around but now they don't care about this group (who were part of the 109) just because a relative of theirs voted against Clinton.

Possibly you would have supported them more fully had, rather than try to legally immigrate as they did, they flown to Mexico and then crossed our southern border as illegals. Had they done that I am certain our leftists here would have cheered for them and wanted to give them government handouts and a voter registration.
Marching against what is clearly wrong does not mean that sympathy is automatic for those that voted to place these wrongs into U.S. Policy.

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 05:41 PM
Coast2coast
Feb 1 2017, 05:39 PM
Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 12:45 PM
clone
Feb 1 2017, 12:20 PM
estonianman
Feb 1 2017, 10:29 AM
How did someone with citizenship get deported?
Posted Image
The citizens were not sent home. Their non-citizen brothers and families were.

Quote:
 
Assali and her husband, Dr. Ghassan Assali, who has a dentistry practice and received his degree from New York University, are originally from Syria but have been living in the United States for 20 years.
Assali's two brothers, their wives and their two children initiated their immigration attempts in 2003 while living in Syria. In December 2016, they were approved to join Assali and her husband in Allentown after the couple bought and furnished a home for them.


I can see where the headline might confuse you though.

See, this is a case where they should not have been sent back. These folks were in the air before the order was signed and had valid visas that they had been trying to get for years. Hopefully this can get cleared up quickly and they can return since it is rather obvious that the brother is doing what he can to make them not a burden to the state.

It is fun to see our democrat friends shit on some immigrants who did nothing wrong though. Why are they hating on these poor people? They hate them because their brother had the audacity to vote for someone other than Clinton. Nice.
Don't hate anyone. I Just don't feel sorry for people that made an irresponsible choice that harms all of us (particularly when the intended harm was announced, promoted and rallied on) that then start whining when they get harmed.







The citizens who voted were not the one's that were harmed. It was their non-voting, legal immigrant relatives who were harmed.
No, they voted for the policies that are keeping their relatives out. They most certainly did vote to harm their family. Now they want sympathy?

Maybe instead of whining they should commission the construction of a time machine, go back and change their vote for one that supports their families unity this time.





Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Demagogue
Member Avatar
Administrator
Coast2coast
Feb 1 2017, 05:48 PM
Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 05:41 PM
Coast2coast
Feb 1 2017, 05:39 PM
Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 12:45 PM
clone
Feb 1 2017, 12:20 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deepPosted Image
The citizens were not sent home. Their non-citizen brothers and families were.

Quote:
 
Assali and her husband, Dr. Ghassan Assali, who has a dentistry practice and received his degree from New York University, are originally from Syria but have been living in the United States for 20 years.
Assali's two brothers, their wives and their two children initiated their immigration attempts in 2003 while living in Syria. In December 2016, they were approved to join Assali and her husband in Allentown after the couple bought and furnished a home for them.


I can see where the headline might confuse you though.

See, this is a case where they should not have been sent back. These folks were in the air before the order was signed and had valid visas that they had been trying to get for years. Hopefully this can get cleared up quickly and they can return since it is rather obvious that the brother is doing what he can to make them not a burden to the state.

It is fun to see our democrat friends shit on some immigrants who did nothing wrong though. Why are they hating on these poor people? They hate them because their brother had the audacity to vote for someone other than Clinton. Nice.
Don't hate anyone. I Just don't feel sorry for people that made an irresponsible choice that harms all of us (particularly when the intended harm was announced, promoted and rallied on) that then start whining when they get harmed.







The citizens who voted were not the one's that were harmed. It was their non-voting, legal immigrant relatives who were harmed.
No, they voted for the policies that are keeping their relatives out. They most certainly did vote to harm their family. Now they want sympathy?

Maybe instead of whining they should commission the construction of a time machine, go back and change their vote for one that supports their families unity this time.





They actually don't seem to have buyers remorse about it. They will just have to wait a little longer to get them in.

It is unfortunate that the families flight was not a few hours earlier though being as they were legal immigrants who had spent quite some time getting things in order. Personally I thought that anyone who was actively on a flight when the order was signed should have been allowed in.
People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to visit violence on those who would do them harm.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eddo26
Member Avatar

They voted for Trump thinking Muslims will get the kick while their family would have pass because they are Christian. Now they are trying to use their religion to get out of the mess they made. They didn't care about what Trump would have done to Muslims, or maybe they prefered it hence they voted Trump to "keep America safe" as they claim. And now these Trumpers want sympathy on the basis of their religion. Never.
We believe only what we want to believe.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 05:57 PM
Coast2coast
Feb 1 2017, 05:48 PM
Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 05:41 PM
Coast2coast
Feb 1 2017, 05:39 PM
Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 12:45 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deepPosted Image
Don't hate anyone. I Just don't feel sorry for people that made an irresponsible choice that harms all of us (particularly when the intended harm was announced, promoted and rallied on) that then start whining when they get harmed.







The citizens who voted were not the one's that were harmed. It was their non-voting, legal immigrant relatives who were harmed.
No, they voted for the policies that are keeping their relatives out. They most certainly did vote to harm their family. Now they want sympathy?

Maybe instead of whining they should commission the construction of a time machine, go back and change their vote for one that supports their families unity this time.





They actually don't seem to have buyers remorse about it. They will just have to wait a little longer to get them in.

It is unfortunate that the families flight was not a few hours earlier though being as they were legal immigrants who had spent quite some time getting things in order. Personally I thought that anyone who was actively on a flight when the order was signed should have been allowed in.
If they don't have buyers remorse than they need to shut up, support the President and join this administration in raising their middle finger to their own relatives.

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Demagogue
Member Avatar
Administrator
Eddo36
Feb 1 2017, 06:06 PM
They voted for Trump thinking Muslims will get the kick while their family would have pass because they are Christian. Now they are trying to use their religion to get out of the mess they made. They didn't care about what Trump would have done to Muslims, or maybe they prefered it hence they voted Trump to "keep America safe" as they claim. And now these Trumpers want sympathy on the basis of their religion. Never.
Well, at the very least this is proof that the ban is absolutely not a Muslim ban. Thanks for pointing particular fact out. Of course I never even thought about religion in reference to the ban but it is a valid point that this case proves the media narrative about it being a Muslim ban was total garbage.
People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to visit violence on those who would do them harm.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
clone
Member Avatar
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
Eddo36
Feb 1 2017, 06:06 PM
They voted for Trump thinking Muslims will get the kick while their family would have pass because they are Christian. Now they are trying to use their religion to get out of the mess they made. They didn't care about what Trump would have done to Muslims, or maybe they prefered it hence they voted Trump to "keep America safe" as they claim. And now these Trumpers want sympathy on the basis of their religion. Never.
darn Christians are going cray cray again....


Muslim Mob Rapes 15 Christian Women in ‘Revenge Attack’ for Conversions

In a recent attack, some 90 Muslims stormed a Christian church in eastern Uganda, beating and tying up the men present before raping 15 of the Christian women.
The assault was reportedly a “revenge attack” against the pastor of the Katira church for allegedly converting Muslims to Christianity. Along with the violence perpetrated against the congregation, the mob also carried off the pastor, the Rev. Moses Mutasa, and severely damaged the church property.

According to a member of the congregation who escaped from the church, one of the attackers shouted, “Away with the pastor who is converting our Muslims to Christianity.” After the attack, church members also found leaflets accusing the pastor of converting Muslims and threatening more attacks.

LINK
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 06:14 PM
Eddo36
Feb 1 2017, 06:06 PM
They voted for Trump thinking Muslims will get the kick while their family would have pass because they are Christian. Now they are trying to use their religion to get out of the mess they made. They didn't care about what Trump would have done to Muslims, or maybe they prefered it hence they voted Trump to "keep America safe" as they claim. And now these Trumpers want sympathy on the basis of their religion. Never.
Well, at the very least this is proof that the ban is absolutely not a Muslim ban. Thanks for pointing particular fact out. Of course I never even thought about religion in reference to the ban but it is a valid point that this case proves the media narrative about it being a Muslim ban was total garbage.
It's a Muslim ban as campaigned on and promised and wanted by conservative America.

If others get caught up in the net I guess that's just collateral damage. :dunno:


Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dr345
Member Avatar

Demagogue
Feb 1 2017, 06:14 PM
Eddo36
Feb 1 2017, 06:06 PM
They voted for Trump thinking Muslims will get the kick while their family would have pass because they are Christian. Now they are trying to use their religion to get out of the mess they made. They didn't care about what Trump would have done to Muslims, or maybe they prefered it hence they voted Trump to "keep America safe" as they claim. And now these Trumpers want sympathy on the basis of their religion. Never.
Well, at the very least this is proof that the ban is absolutely not a Muslim ban. Thanks for pointing particular fact out. Of course I never even thought about religion in reference to the ban but it is a valid point that this case proves the media narrative about it being a Muslim ban was total garbage.
a few Non Muslims caught in the dragnet does not mean it wasn't.
un jour on se souviendra de ca comme on se souvient de ca
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ringotuna
Member Avatar

Two a.m.
Feb 1 2017, 03:43 PM
ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 02:01 PM
Two a.m.
Feb 1 2017, 10:20 AM
ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 09:53 AM
Two a.m.
Feb 1 2017, 09:37 AM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Be honest with us Two. You know very well that not everyone is as dialed in or consumed by politics as you. The fact that you 'saw it coming' in no way means they should have seen things as you do. Your expectations of them are the equivalent of judging a fish by how well it climbs a tree. ( :biggrin: Saw that on FB) And be honest with yourself. The raw and disturbing truth is they are deserving of their circumstances because they disagreed with your perceptions. Deep down you know that's true.

Let's just say the older I get, the less forgiving I become. Okay, so, I don't like their vote. I disagree with them. I'll grant you that. But I respect they did what they did and their right to do it. I've got very close friends who cast ballots for Trump. And if it has bad consequences for them, I'll probably feel bad for them because they are my friends and I know them.

But whatever bitterness or coldheartedness I may be guilty of (and okay, there is some), there is also a deeper underlying reality to this story. You say they aren't as dialed in as me. But that's a problem because as citizens casting a ballot in an election they SHOULD be as dialed in as me. They may or may not make the same choices I do but it is their responsibility not to walk into a voting booth ignorant of what they are doing. You know as well as I do that far too many people wander into that booth and make superficial choices based on vague feelings induced by gauzy slogans "Yes, we can" "Make America great again" "Stronger together".

And maybe that's why our politics are so messed up. Because people don't study the candidates or the issues and just cast ballots that go with this or that flow of the moment, we end up with crappy officeholders and even crappier campaigns. Even good candidates who really want to do good things for the nation have to basically dumb everything down into soundbites to appeal to people who are barely listening.

And yet this stuff has consequences. Big ones. It's just like my earlier drunk driver example. Okay, maybe I can feel sorry for the guy who slams down a 12 pack, goes for a joyride and ends up wrecking his car.

But there is also an element of responsibility here and - to be very honest - I'm getting very tired of being asked to feel sorry for people who keep poking themselves in the eye all the time. Maybe they deserve sympathy. None of us are perfect. But folks like this almost disgust me more than Harambe4Trump. They may be nicer people but at least Harambe knows where his own interests lie - and they are doing the same amount of damage with their vote as he is.

But if you are right and expecting a voter to make an intelligent, informed and responsible choice is like judging a fish climbing a tree, then where exactly does that leave us on the concept of democracy? Certainly not anywhere encouraging. Are my expectations truly too high?

So, okay, fine. I'll be a decent human and feel sorry for them.

But I really wish they'd stop driving drunk at the voting booth after crashing both our cars.

On any give day, you'd be sitting there defending any ignorance based vote for Hillary. You know I'm right.

Then, you don't appear to know me as well as you think. I don't defend ignorance-based ANYTHING. I mean, I'd defend the right to vote for Hillary based on ignorance. But I'd also defend the right to vote for Trump based on ignorance.

But as far as defending ignorant people for being ignorant, that's not my bag. I've always said I have more respect for a smart person who thinks I'm stupid than a stupid person who thinks I'm smart. That hasn't changed.

You know I'm right, and I know you'll lie to cover your tracks.
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Two a.m.
Member Avatar

ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 06:25 PM
Two a.m.
Feb 1 2017, 03:43 PM
ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 02:01 PM
Two a.m.
Feb 1 2017, 10:20 AM
ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 09:53 AM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Let's just say the older I get, the less forgiving I become. Okay, so, I don't like their vote. I disagree with them. I'll grant you that. But I respect they did what they did and their right to do it. I've got very close friends who cast ballots for Trump. And if it has bad consequences for them, I'll probably feel bad for them because they are my friends and I know them.

But whatever bitterness or coldheartedness I may be guilty of (and okay, there is some), there is also a deeper underlying reality to this story. You say they aren't as dialed in as me. But that's a problem because as citizens casting a ballot in an election they SHOULD be as dialed in as me. They may or may not make the same choices I do but it is their responsibility not to walk into a voting booth ignorant of what they are doing. You know as well as I do that far too many people wander into that booth and make superficial choices based on vague feelings induced by gauzy slogans "Yes, we can" "Make America great again" "Stronger together".

And maybe that's why our politics are so messed up. Because people don't study the candidates or the issues and just cast ballots that go with this or that flow of the moment, we end up with crappy officeholders and even crappier campaigns. Even good candidates who really want to do good things for the nation have to basically dumb everything down into soundbites to appeal to people who are barely listening.

And yet this stuff has consequences. Big ones. It's just like my earlier drunk driver example. Okay, maybe I can feel sorry for the guy who slams down a 12 pack, goes for a joyride and ends up wrecking his car.

But there is also an element of responsibility here and - to be very honest - I'm getting very tired of being asked to feel sorry for people who keep poking themselves in the eye all the time. Maybe they deserve sympathy. None of us are perfect. But folks like this almost disgust me more than Harambe4Trump. They may be nicer people but at least Harambe knows where his own interests lie - and they are doing the same amount of damage with their vote as he is.

But if you are right and expecting a voter to make an intelligent, informed and responsible choice is like judging a fish climbing a tree, then where exactly does that leave us on the concept of democracy? Certainly not anywhere encouraging. Are my expectations truly too high?

So, okay, fine. I'll be a decent human and feel sorry for them.

But I really wish they'd stop driving drunk at the voting booth after crashing both our cars.

On any give day, you'd be sitting there defending any ignorance based vote for Hillary. You know I'm right.

Then, you don't appear to know me as well as you think. I don't defend ignorance-based ANYTHING. I mean, I'd defend the right to vote for Hillary based on ignorance. But I'd also defend the right to vote for Trump based on ignorance.

But as far as defending ignorant people for being ignorant, that's not my bag. I've always said I have more respect for a smart person who thinks I'm stupid than a stupid person who thinks I'm smart. That hasn't changed.

You know I'm right, and I know you'll lie to cover your tracks.

Like I say, Ringo, you really know very little about me - and statements like the above prove that better than anything I could say.

"The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them." - George Orwell, 1984
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Harambe4Trump
Member Avatar

Coast2coast
Feb 1 2017, 05:28 PM
I_feel_the_trump
Feb 1 2017, 12:43 PM
The safety of american citizens is the priority here. No one promised you a Rose Garden!

Get it like ya live: HARD!

"life is a bitch, then you die" :wah: :wah: :wah:
And now we are more hated and less safe.

You along with this couple voted to make it such.



Japan has accepted nearly zero Syrian or Somali refugees. Which is safer: Tokyo or Los Angeles?
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary.
#MAGA
#wallsnotwars
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ringotuna
Member Avatar

Opinionated
Feb 1 2017, 03:54 PM
ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 02:32 PM
Opinionated
Feb 1 2017, 02:24 PM
ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 02:11 PM
PATruth
Feb 1 2017, 01:32 PM
If you listen to Rachel Maddow and the radical left Trump is going to start deporting people that came over on the Mayflower.

The post election meltdown will continue for a while. They are a loud, rude, obnoxious group with a microphone and the media. Eventually the American people will see through the BS. There is NO Muslim ban, period. Trump is NOT deporting immigrants, period.
I think Americans are beginning to wake up to the media bulls**t. The question is if we will hold them accountable. These days journalism means saying anything at all, so long as it is a means to an end.

Quote:
 
There is NO Muslim ban, period. Trump is NOT deporting immigrants, period.


It's too late, It's been beat into their heads, and they're running with it.
Candidate Trump said that he was going to ban Muslims. I can go get you the quotes on that if you doubt me. But let's assume that you agree that's what he said when he was campaigning.

Now, upon entering office he issues an immigration ban that targets seven countries, all of which are majority Muslim and has offered exceptions for members of "persecuted religions", which in Muslim countries is going to be non-Muslims. So Muslims from these countries? Not welcome. Non-Muslims from these countries? You guys are fine, come on in.

And on the one hand Trump supporters claim that Trump has done exactly what he said he would do (remember, he said he would ban Muslims) while on the other hand claiming that this is not a ban on Muslims.

Which seems an awful like:

Posted Image
Go get em. Let's talk about it. Prepare your case and we'll discuss it when I get back.

Keep in mind however that you're not going to goad me into defending Trump. I'm not exactly thrilled with this EO, but I'll judge it on it's merits, not lefty hyperbole.

This is from the Trump/Pence campaign website:

Quote:
 
(New York, NY) December 7th, 2015, -- Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on.


https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-statement-on-preventing-muslim-immigration

Do I need more?
No that's plenty, Thank you. Now tell me this, does the Executive Order Trump issued

: ban all Muslims?
: ban only Muslims?
: ban Muslims from 40 or so other predominantly Muslim countries?

Or does it temporarily ban travelers from several countries the Obama Administration deemed 'of concern'?

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/02/18/dhs-announces-further-travel-restrictions-visa-waiver-program

There is no "Muslim Ban" ...Understand now?

Now as for your meme. Cute, but it more aptly applies to the left's insistence of a muslim ban in the face of facts. So... :biggrin: thanks for that.

Edited by ringotuna, Feb 1 2017, 06:46 PM.
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ringotuna
Member Avatar

Two a.m.
Feb 1 2017, 06:27 PM
ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 06:25 PM
Two a.m.
Feb 1 2017, 03:43 PM
ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 02:01 PM
Two a.m.
Feb 1 2017, 10:20 AM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
On any give day, you'd be sitting there defending any ignorance based vote for Hillary. You know I'm right.

Then, you don't appear to know me as well as you think. I don't defend ignorance-based ANYTHING. I mean, I'd defend the right to vote for Hillary based on ignorance. But I'd also defend the right to vote for Trump based on ignorance.

But as far as defending ignorant people for being ignorant, that's not my bag. I've always said I have more respect for a smart person who thinks I'm stupid than a stupid person who thinks I'm smart. That hasn't changed.

You know I'm right, and I know you'll lie to cover your tracks.

Like I say, Ringo, you really know very little about me - and statements like the above prove that better than anything I could say.

Your copy machine story says otherwise. :biggrin:
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
CautionaryTales
Member Avatar

Eddo36
Feb 1 2017, 06:06 PM
They voted for Trump thinking Muslims will get the kick while their family would have pass because they are Christian. Now they are trying to use their religion to get out of the mess they made. They didn't care about what Trump would have done to Muslims, or maybe they prefered it hence they voted Trump to "keep America safe" as they claim. And now these Trumpers want sympathy on the basis of their religion. Never.
When Trump comes for you, I will not care one little bit about what he does to you.
Just a heads up.
Trump supporter.


Have you paid your internet taxes?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Two a.m.
Member Avatar

ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 06:41 PM
Two a.m.
Feb 1 2017, 06:27 PM
ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 06:25 PM
Two a.m.
Feb 1 2017, 03:43 PM
ringotuna
Feb 1 2017, 02:01 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Then, you don't appear to know me as well as you think. I don't defend ignorance-based ANYTHING. I mean, I'd defend the right to vote for Hillary based on ignorance. But I'd also defend the right to vote for Trump based on ignorance.

But as far as defending ignorant people for being ignorant, that's not my bag. I've always said I have more respect for a smart person who thinks I'm stupid than a stupid person who thinks I'm smart. That hasn't changed.

You know I'm right, and I know you'll lie to cover your tracks.

Like I say, Ringo, you really know very little about me - and statements like the above prove that better than anything I could say.

Your copy machine story says otherwise. :biggrin:

My what? :confused:
Edited by Two a.m., Feb 1 2017, 06:53 PM.
"The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them." - George Orwell, 1984
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply