Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data
Topic Started: Feb 5 2017, 05:22 PM (206 Views)
clone
Member Avatar
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data

(excerpt)

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.
A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.
The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.
But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html#ixzz4XqeNeIdg
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Irrefutable, misleading and unverified are all adjectives of opinion. It'll be interesting to see where this goes.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
clone
Member Avatar
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
wilmywood8455
Feb 5 2017, 05:28 PM
Irrefutable, misleading and unverified are all adjectives of opinion. It'll be interesting to see where this goes.
Quoting Al Gore again?
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dr345
Member Avatar

mfab
un jour on se souviendra de ca comme on se souvient de ca
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robert Stout
Member Avatar

dr345
Feb 5 2017, 06:01 PM
mfab
Kill messengers who don't defend the warmist industry ???............ :lol:
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

I still don't know what leftists are doing to fight global warming. They sure love to tell other people to fight on their behalf though.
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply