|
After decades of Republican victories, here’s how California became a blue state again; By ethnicly cleansing white Americans
|
|
Topic Started: Jun 20 2017, 11:32 PM (2,159 Views)
|
|
Tsalagi
|
Jul 14 2017, 09:30 AM
Post #41
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 09:05 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 07:44 AM
Also, not all "whitey Europeans" treated the indigenous like crap, the French coming down from their colony in Montreal and Quebec, and the Swedes From New Sweden, and the Dutch from New Holland dealt pretty good with the native tribes they came into contact with.
Why don't all these towns and cities in New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico. Texas, and California have Indian names instead of Spanish names? Weren't the Indians there first? Pretty sure you're moving the goalpost...focus Philly..I realize that's like asking the sun not to shine but...do try.
|
|
|
| |
|
Harambe4Trump
|
Jul 14 2017, 10:24 AM
Post #42
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,326
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #42
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:30 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 09:05 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 07:44 AM
Also, not all "whitey Europeans" treated the indigenous like crap, the French coming down from their colony in Montreal and Quebec, and the Swedes From New Sweden, and the Dutch from New Holland dealt pretty good with the native tribes they came into contact with.
Why don't all these towns and cities in New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico. Texas, and California have Indian names instead of Spanish names? Weren't the Indians there first?
Pretty sure you're moving the goalpost...focus Philly..I realize that's like asking the sun not to shine but...do try. No, it's quite pertinent. The vast flood of immigrants from Mexico and Central America are not indiginious.
|
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary. #MAGA #wallsnotwars
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jul 14 2017, 10:47 AM
Post #43
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 10:24 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:30 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 09:05 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 07:44 AM
Also, not all "whitey Europeans" treated the indigenous like crap, the French coming down from their colony in Montreal and Quebec, and the Swedes From New Sweden, and the Dutch from New Holland dealt pretty good with the native tribes they came into contact with.
Why don't all these towns and cities in New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico. Texas, and California have Indian names instead of Spanish names? Weren't the Indians there first?
Pretty sure you're moving the goalpost...focus Philly..I realize that's like asking the sun not to shine but...do try.
No, it's quite pertinent. The vast flood of immigrants from Mexico and Central America are not indiginious. Has nothing to do with the topic's title...The American Southwest has had a heavily HIspanic influence for 3 centuries...deny it all you will, but you'll look pretty stupid doing it.
|
|
|
| |
|
Harambe4Trump
|
Jul 14 2017, 12:47 PM
Post #44
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,326
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #42
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 10:47 AM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 10:24 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:30 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 09:05 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 07:44 AM
Also, not all "whitey Europeans" treated the indigenous like crap, the French coming down from their colony in Montreal and Quebec, and the Swedes From New Sweden, and the Dutch from New Holland dealt pretty good with the native tribes they came into contact with.
Why don't all these towns and cities in New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico. Texas, and California have Indian names instead of Spanish names? Weren't the Indians there first?
Pretty sure you're moving the goalpost...focus Philly..I realize that's like asking the sun not to shine but...do try.
No, it's quite pertinent. The vast flood of immigrants from Mexico and Central America are not indiginious.
Has nothing to do with the topic's title...The American Southwest has had a heavily HIspanic influence for 3 centuries...deny it all you will, but you'll look pretty stupid doing it. The illegals invading these lands are not the descendants of the Californios and Tejanos.
|
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary. #MAGA #wallsnotwars
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jul 14 2017, 02:16 PM
Post #45
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 12:47 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 10:47 AM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 10:24 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:30 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 09:05 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Pretty sure you're moving the goalpost...focus Philly..I realize that's like asking the sun not to shine but...do try.
No, it's quite pertinent. The vast flood of immigrants from Mexico and Central America are not indiginious.
Has nothing to do with the topic's title...The American Southwest has had a heavily HIspanic influence for 3 centuries...deny it all you will, but you'll look pretty stupid doing it.
The illegals invading these lands are not the descendants of the Californios and Tejanos. now it's my turn to say irrevelent...3 centuries of Hispanics being born in the southwest, has nothing to do with illegals.
|
|
|
| |
|
Harambe4Trump
|
Jul 14 2017, 02:51 PM
Post #46
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,326
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #42
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 02:16 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 12:47 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 10:47 AM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 10:24 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:30 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
No, it's quite pertinent. The vast flood of immigrants from Mexico and Central America are not indiginious.
Has nothing to do with the topic's title...The American Southwest has had a heavily HIspanic influence for 3 centuries...deny it all you will, but you'll look pretty stupid doing it.
The illegals invading these lands are not the descendants of the Californios and Tejanos.
now it's my turn to say irrevelent...3 centuries of Hispanics being born in the southwest, has nothing to do with illegals. You are comparing apples to oranges; the issue isn't the indiginious minority. The issue is invasion.
|
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary. #MAGA #wallsnotwars
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jul 14 2017, 03:13 PM
Post #47
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 02:51 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 02:16 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 12:47 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 10:47 AM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 10:24 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Has nothing to do with the topic's title...The American Southwest has had a heavily HIspanic influence for 3 centuries...deny it all you will, but you'll look pretty stupid doing it.
The illegals invading these lands are not the descendants of the Californios and Tejanos.
now it's my turn to say irrevelent...3 centuries of Hispanics being born in the southwest, has nothing to do with illegals.
You are comparing apples to oranges; the issue isn't the indiginious minority. The issue is invasion. No, the issue is Hispanic influence in the region...you're saying they've been lily white since its inception, but the areas has been heavily ifluenced to Hispanic population and culture for 3 centuries, and were it not for a trumped up war in 1848, Mexico would have probably retaken Texas, and kept the Southwest, and you'd be looking at Americans jumping their border to find work.
|
|
|
| |
|
philly rabbit
|
Jul 14 2017, 03:33 PM
Post #48
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,094
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #69
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:28 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 09:02 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 07:41 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 06:16 AM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 12 2017, 12:55 PM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
What he's doing now is defending the Spanish empire of the southwest and central America because whitey protestant Christian took it's land as they did his land. But the blood thirsty conquering Indian slaughtering Spanish did not create and grow the United States of America .. he knows who did.
Doing it again, please provide a link to any statements I've made defending the Spanish Empire in it's conquest of the Americas. Oh, and the Spanish weren't there for the Fur Trade....the Cherokee met the Spanish in North Georgia as they came up from their colony in present-day Florida, in about the late 15th century, they were seeking gold, not fur. For the record, at that time, Spain was a cruel, indeed savage colonial master, nor am I letting Portgual off the hook, actually I include the Papacy at that time, it was they that drew a line right thru the New World and divided it up between them. They would pit one tribe against another, just as the English would in North America.
So now your panicking because i pointed out the Spanish conquest of central america and the american southwest? Who was there first .. the Indians or the Spanish?
No panic, I simply asked you to provide a link to any statements of mine that lent defense of the Kingdom of Spain's action in colonial central and South America. Who brought up the Spanish conquest of the Indians when you were going on and on about how whites stole all that land from the Mexicans .. you or me?
|
|
Proud Deplorable.
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jul 14 2017, 03:46 PM
Post #49
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 03:33 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:28 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 09:02 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 07:41 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 06:16 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Doing it again, please provide a link to any statements I've made defending the Spanish Empire in it's conquest of the Americas. Oh, and the Spanish weren't there for the Fur Trade....the Cherokee met the Spanish in North Georgia as they came up from their colony in present-day Florida, in about the late 15th century, they were seeking gold, not fur. For the record, at that time, Spain was a cruel, indeed savage colonial master, nor am I letting Portgual off the hook, actually I include the Papacy at that time, it was they that drew a line right thru the New World and divided it up between them. They would pit one tribe against another, just as the English would in North America.
So now your panicking because i pointed out the Spanish conquest of central america and the american southwest? Who was there first .. the Indians or the Spanish?
No panic, I simply asked you to provide a link to any statements of mine that lent defense of the Kingdom of Spain's action in colonial central and South America.
Who brought up the Spanish conquest of the Indians when you were going on and on about how whites stole all that land from the Mexicans .. you or me? Please provide the statement....or do you need another mark on your profile?
|
|
|
| |
|
Harambe4Trump
|
Jul 14 2017, 05:32 PM
Post #50
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,326
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #42
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 03:13 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 02:51 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 02:16 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 12:47 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 10:47 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
The illegals invading these lands are not the descendants of the Californios and Tejanos.
now it's my turn to say irrevelent...3 centuries of Hispanics being born in the southwest, has nothing to do with illegals.
You are comparing apples to oranges; the issue isn't the indiginious minority. The issue is invasion.
No, the issue is Hispanic influence in the region...you're saying they've been lily white since its inception, but the areas has been heavily ifluenced to Hispanic population and culture for 3 centuries, and were it not for a trumped up war in 1848, Mexico would have probably retaken Texas, and kept the Southwest, and you'd be looking at Americans jumping their border to find work. California and Texas do not have a Hispanic majority because of the native ethnic hispanics who lived there in 1848.
|
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary. #MAGA #wallsnotwars
|
| |
|
Drudge X
|
Jul 14 2017, 08:52 PM
Post #51
|
|
- Posts:
- 14,736
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #11
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 03:13 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 02:51 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 02:16 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 12:47 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 10:47 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
The illegals invading these lands are not the descendants of the Californios and Tejanos.
now it's my turn to say irrevelent...3 centuries of Hispanics being born in the southwest, has nothing to do with illegals.
You are comparing apples to oranges; the issue isn't the indiginious minority. The issue is invasion.
No, the issue is Hispanic influence in the region...you're saying they've been lily white since its inception, but the areas has been heavily ifluenced to Hispanic population and culture for 3 centuries, and were it not for a trumped up war in 1848, Mexico would have probably retaken Texas, and kept the Southwest, and you'd be looking at Americans jumping their border to find work. So you are blaming the war for what's happening to Mexico today?
|
|
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jul 14 2017, 09:28 PM
Post #52
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Drudge X
- Jul 14 2017, 08:52 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 03:13 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 02:51 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 02:16 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 12:47 PM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
now it's my turn to say irrevelent...3 centuries of Hispanics being born in the southwest, has nothing to do with illegals.
You are comparing apples to oranges; the issue isn't the indiginious minority. The issue is invasion.
No, the issue is Hispanic influence in the region...you're saying they've been lily white since its inception, but the areas has been heavily ifluenced to Hispanic population and culture for 3 centuries, and were it not for a trumped up war in 1848, Mexico would have probably retaken Texas, and kept the Southwest, and you'd be looking at Americans jumping their border to find work.
So you are blaming the war for what's happening to Mexico today? Making leaps of logic I can't see the connection?
|
|
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jul 14 2017, 09:29 PM
Post #53
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 05:32 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 03:13 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 02:51 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 02:16 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 12:47 PM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
now it's my turn to say irrevelent...3 centuries of Hispanics being born in the southwest, has nothing to do with illegals.
You are comparing apples to oranges; the issue isn't the indiginious minority. The issue is invasion.
No, the issue is Hispanic influence in the region...you're saying they've been lily white since its inception, but the areas has been heavily ifluenced to Hispanic population and culture for 3 centuries, and were it not for a trumped up war in 1848, Mexico would have probably retaken Texas, and kept the Southwest, and you'd be looking at Americans jumping their border to find work.
California and Texas do not have a Hispanic majority because of the native ethnic hispanics who lived there in 1848. Would have if left uninvaded by the Americans.But irrevelent, the area has been Hispanic in nature for 3 centuries. As I stated, you can ignore it if you want, but you'd look stupid trying.
|
|
|
| |
|
Harambe4Trump
|
Jul 14 2017, 10:06 PM
Post #54
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,326
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #42
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:29 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 05:32 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 03:13 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 02:51 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 02:16 PM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
You are comparing apples to oranges; the issue isn't the indiginious minority. The issue is invasion.
No, the issue is Hispanic influence in the region...you're saying they've been lily white since its inception, but the areas has been heavily ifluenced to Hispanic population and culture for 3 centuries, and were it not for a trumped up war in 1848, Mexico would have probably retaken Texas, and kept the Southwest, and you'd be looking at Americans jumping their border to find work.
California and Texas do not have a Hispanic majority because of the native ethnic hispanics who lived there in 1848.
Would have if left uninvaded by the Americans.But irrevelent, the area has been Hispanic in nature for 3 centuries. As I stated, you can ignore it if you want, but you'd look stupid trying. No, it has not. Texas and California were sparsely inhabited into the 20th century, much less in the colonial Spanish empire.
|
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary. #MAGA #wallsnotwars
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jul 15 2017, 07:20 AM
Post #55
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 10:06 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:29 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 05:32 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 03:13 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 02:51 PM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
No, the issue is Hispanic influence in the region...you're saying they've been lily white since its inception, but the areas has been heavily ifluenced to Hispanic population and culture for 3 centuries, and were it not for a trumped up war in 1848, Mexico would have probably retaken Texas, and kept the Southwest, and you'd be looking at Americans jumping their border to find work.
California and Texas do not have a Hispanic majority because of the native ethnic hispanics who lived there in 1848.
Would have if left uninvaded by the Americans.But irrevelent, the area has been Hispanic in nature for 3 centuries. As I stated, you can ignore it if you want, but you'd look stupid trying.
No, it has not. Texas and California were sparsely inhabited into the 20th century, much less in the colonial Spanish empire. So places like Monterrey, San Francisco, San Diego, Los Angeles, San Antonio, etc,...they weren't there when we got there? Whether they had huge populations or one...the area has always had a Hispanic flavor to it. Right now...in case you're wondering is when you started looking stupid.
|
|
|
| |
|
Harambe4Trump
|
Jul 15 2017, 07:56 AM
Post #56
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,326
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #42
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jul 15 2017, 07:20 AM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 10:06 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:29 PM
- Harambe4Trump
- Jul 14 2017, 05:32 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 03:13 PM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
California and Texas do not have a Hispanic majority because of the native ethnic hispanics who lived there in 1848.
Would have if left uninvaded by the Americans.But irrevelent, the area has been Hispanic in nature for 3 centuries. As I stated, you can ignore it if you want, but you'd look stupid trying.
No, it has not. Texas and California were sparsely inhabited into the 20th century, much less in the colonial Spanish empire.
So places like Monterrey, San Francisco, San Diego, Los Angeles, San Antonio, etc,...they weren't there when we got there? Whether they had huge populations or one...the area has always had a Hispanic flavor to it. Right now...in case you're wondering is when you started looking stupid. The illegals now present are not the descendants of the year 1900 inhabitants of San Antonio.
|
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary. #MAGA #wallsnotwars
|
| |
|
philly rabbit
|
Jul 15 2017, 08:52 AM
Post #57
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,094
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #69
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 03:46 PM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 03:33 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:28 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 09:02 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 07:41 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
So now your panicking because i pointed out the Spanish conquest of central america and the american southwest? Who was there first .. the Indians or the Spanish?
No panic, I simply asked you to provide a link to any statements of mine that lent defense of the Kingdom of Spain's action in colonial central and South America.
Who brought up the Spanish conquest of the Indians when you were going on and on about how whites stole all that land from the Mexicans .. you or me?
Please provide the statement....or do you need another mark on your profile? I brought up the Spanish, not you.
The point I made was that the Spanish took lands from the Indians by conquest but the Spanish didn't found the U.S.A., British protestants did.
And don't threaten me about profiles, I don't care how much you whine to the mods, I stand by my quote that you said, it wasn't fabricated.
You wrote it, I saw it, I quoted it.
|
|
Proud Deplorable.
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jul 15 2017, 10:16 AM
Post #58
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- philly rabbit
- Jul 15 2017, 08:52 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 03:46 PM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 03:33 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jul 14 2017, 09:28 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jul 14 2017, 09:02 AM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
No panic, I simply asked you to provide a link to any statements of mine that lent defense of the Kingdom of Spain's action in colonial central and South America.
Who brought up the Spanish conquest of the Indians when you were going on and on about how whites stole all that land from the Mexicans .. you or me?
Please provide the statement....or do you need another mark on your profile?
I brought up the Spanish, not you. The point I made was that the Spanish took lands from the Indians by conquest but the Spanish didn't found the U.S.A., British protestants did. And don't threaten me about profiles, I don't care how much you whine to the mods, I stand by my quote that you said, it wasn't fabricated. You wrote it, I saw it, I quoted it. Your point had nothing to do with the Thread's title...I've only attempted to keep you focused on the conversation. I also didn't "Whine" to the mods, you lied..and if you could have stood by your statement, you'd have been able to provide the link to the statement where you stipulated it was said...you're a liar.
And your terribly uninformed bout the origins of the colonies....New York was not founded by British Protestants, it was the Colony of New Holland, New Jersey was the Colony of New Sweden,
Of course there is Florida which wasn't an original colony but it's origins were the Kingdom of Spain, Louisiana was part of France
So once again, I have to educate you....this is pathetic...that a grown man should make such statements without doing one iota of research to back up his comments.
Edited by Tsalagi, Jul 15 2017, 10:21 AM.
|
|
|
| |
|
Harambe4Trump
|
Jul 15 2017, 11:26 AM
Post #59
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,326
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #42
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
[twitter=https://twitter.com/stefanmolyneux/status/886241297937293312]
|
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary. #MAGA #wallsnotwars
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jul 15 2017, 11:42 AM
Post #60
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
Not revelant to the Topic title
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|