| Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| CNN is DOXXING and threatening anyone that makes CNN memes; So here is what we need to do .... | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 5 2017, 07:55 PM (6,850 Views) | |
| ringotuna | Jul 11 2017, 06:06 AM Post #121 |
|
Of course you're going to ignore and duck away. I can understand why you would want to. It illustrates in simple easy to understand terms the fallacy of your underhanded red herring that somehow by criticizing CNN, I am "making him out as a victim"
What is the age of consent for threats Tik? His age is irrelevant. And to determine WHY it was mis-reported you'd first have to determine who mis-reported it, then ask them. Someone got it wrong. You can speculate all day long as to whether that was intentional or not, but in the end, it's still irrelevant and another red herring.
At face value, it shows a man frightened into backtracking after first posting the gif, then taking credit and bragging about it. ” You're really going to sit there and peddle some bullsh!t scenario where this douche suddenly found Jesus and repented without somehow being compelled? That's laughable. More likely, his repentance came about by CNN's attempts to contact him, wanting to talk.
Again, he was more likely motivated to apologize by CNN's attempts to contact him as opposed to some sudden epiphany. The apology came one day after CNN identified and attempted to contact him. "Sh!t bricks"...yes you would.
There is no conflating Tik, it's a clear threat to the reddit user, and a warning to anyone who would dare mock CNN. Despite Kazcynski's pathetic weasel wording "This line is being misinterpreted. It was intended only to mean we made no agreement w/ the man about his identity." The statement neither retracts or denies they made a threat. In fact it does quite the opposite, further conveying that they have no agreement or obligation to keep his identity private. "CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change. " Seriously, how does that statement, in any way convey Kazcynski's after the fact spin? He's a journalist for christ's sake. One would think that he would know how to use words to convey his thoughts. If he wanted to say "we have no agreement" he should have said "we have no agreement", instead of issuing a less than subtle threat.
Well duh..Thank you Captain Obvious. Both he and CNN are in damage control mode. Solo is serving up a bullsh!t "That's not who I am" apology which is completely contradictory to his history of racist and offensive remarks. We both know it's a pitiful attempt to un-sh!t himself. It's the same crap we get from asshats who use the term n*****, on a regular basis then claim not to be racist when confronted. Likewise CNN would very much like this to go away. But it's not going away ...so tough sh!t. Their threat has backfired on them in a big way. They're just gonna have to endure the consequences of their actions. Hopefully they'll learn that they can't go around bullying and intimidating people.
So what? That's a completely irrelevant distraction to both CNN's and Solo's situations. Nice try, but if you somehow think it has any bearing...ask the reddit mods. |
| Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated. | |
![]() |
|
| Mr. Tik | Jul 11 2017, 11:52 AM Post #122 |
![]()
|
Of course you're going to ignore and duck away. I can understand why you would want to. It illustrates in simple easy to understand terms the fallacy of your underhanded red herring that somehow by criticizing CNN, I am "making him out as a victim" I sincerely apologize if you feel that I mischaracterized your narrative. If I had known it would be this upsetting to you, I would have worded it differently The fact that you would resort to implications on my part regarding beastialty indicates just how offended you were and I will endeavor to be more considerate in the future.
What is the age of consent for threats Tik? His age is irrelevant. And to determine WHY it was mis-reported you'd first have to determine who mis-reported it, then ask them. Someone got it wrong. You can speculate all day long as to whether that was intentional or not, but in the end, it's still irrelevant and another red herring. So..my speculating is irrelevant but your's is not...hmmm kinda like them yabbuts..you can yabbut till the cows come home while calling out yabbuts from your debate opponents. I am not implying that there is some "age of consent", but rather that this narrative must not be too solid that the ankle biters here feel that they have to appeal to emotion to be persuasive. "ohhh..the big mean CNN are hounding a poor widdle 15 year old boy!!!!! ( or nine years old girl, depending on the "source"). btw the "misreporting" came from hans fellow trolls on reddit (unreliable sources) and thus was propagated by the people making hay about this..including Trump's son and some right wing mediaq outlets.
At face value, it shows a man frightened into backtracking after first posting the gif, then taking credit and bragging about it. Uh..that's what I said essentailly. ” You're really going to sit there and peddle some bullsh!t scenario where this douche suddenly found Jesus and repented without somehow being compelled? That's laughable. More likely, his repentance came about by CNN's attempts to contact him, wanting to talk. But still, no evidence that they threatened him before hand That is all speculation on your part. Besides, when most people do things that are morally questionable, they are aware of it
Again, he was more likely motivated to apologize by CNN's attempts to contact him as opposed to some sudden epiphany. The apology came one day after CNN identified and attempted to contact him. "Sh!t bricks"...yes you would. It seems as though we are in agreement with thse points..why do you continue to be so hostile?
There is no conflating Tik, it's a clear threat to the reddit user, and a warning to anyone who would dare mock CNN. Despite Kazcynski's pathetic weasel wording "This line is being misinterpreted. It was intended only to mean we made no agreement w/ the man about his identity." The statement neither retracts or denies they made a threat. In fact it does quite the opposite, further conveying that they have no agreement or obligation to keep his identity private. Jon Stewart was merciless in mocking CNN during his tenure..and his criticisms were a lot more pointed than a stupid gif and I don't recall them trying to blackmail him..and he had a bigger audience than this guy did. "CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change. " Seriously, how does that statement, in any way convey Kazcynski's after the fact spin? He's a journalist for christ's sake. One would think that he would know how to use words to convey his thoughts. If he wanted to say "we have no agreement" he should have said "we have no agreement", instead of issuing a less than subtle threat. I agree that the wording is unfortunate, however I am still of the opinion that the severity of this has been overstated A tempest in a teacup.
Well duh..Thank you Captain Obvious. Both he and CNN are in damage control mode. Solo is serving up a bullsh!t "That's not who I am" apology which is completely contradictory to his history of racist and offensive remarks. We both know it's a pitiful attempt to un-sh!t himself. It's the same crap we get from asshats who use the term n*****, on a regular basis then claim not to be racist when confronted. Likewise CNN would very much like this to go away. But it's not going away ...so tough sh!t. Their threat has backfired on them in a big way. They're just gonna have to endure the consequences of their actions. Hopefully they'll learn that they can't go around bullying and intimidating people. Actually, it is. News stories on this are dropping off and I venture that by this time next week no one will be talking about it
So what? That's a completely irrelevant distraction to both CNN's and Solo's situations. Nice try, but if you somehow think it has any bearing...ask the reddit mods. So..you are free to speculate about motives when it suits your little crusade here but then you get testy if I ask questions? At risk of provoking you further, I would like to suggest that perhaps, you are a wee bit too invested in this. Edited by Mr. Tik, Jul 11 2017, 11:54 AM.
|
|
You may be a conservative republican..if you are pro life until you get your mistress knocked up | |
![]() |
|
| voted4reagan | Jul 11 2017, 08:08 PM Post #123 |
![]()
|
Fap on Fap off... The Fapper |
|
Trump needs to focus more so on the male vote. He should have nationalized the Boy Scouts when they decided to admit girls. Harambe4Trump AKA "FASHY" | |
![]() |
|
| voted4reagan | Jul 11 2017, 08:09 PM Post #124 |
![]()
|
Fap on Fap off... The Fapper |
|
Trump needs to focus more so on the male vote. He should have nationalized the Boy Scouts when they decided to admit girls. Harambe4Trump AKA "FASHY" | |
![]() |
|
| ringotuna | Jul 11 2017, 08:14 PM Post #125 |
|
I sincerely apologize if you feel that I mischaracterized your narrative.If I had known it would be this upsetting to you, I would have worded it differently.The fact that you would resort to implications on my part regarding beastialty indicates just how offended you were and I will endeavor to be more considerate in the future. Oh my..My twitch little friend. That's amusing, but return to my post and show me where I implicated you in any way of bestiality. No such implication was made. Tell me....What part of "CNN is the chicken f@cker" eluded you. But did it truly elude you? or are you merely triggered into presenting yet another red herring? Will you never learn? Are you comforted by the fantasy that you think you can actually upset me? That's so precious. LOL So..my speculating is irrelevant but your's is not...hmmm kinda like them yabbuts..you can yabbut till the cows come home while calling out yabbuts from your debate opponents. I am not implying that there is some "age of consent", but rather that this narrative must not be too solid that the ankle biters here feel that they have to appeal to emotion to be persuasive. "ohhh..the big mean CNN are hounding a poor widdle 15 year old boy!!!!! ( or nine years old girl, depending on the "source"). btw the "misreporting" came from hans fellow trolls on reddit (unreliable sources) and thus was propagated by the people making hay about this..including Trump's son and some right wing mediaq outlets. Ok. Well it appears you've identified the source of the mis-information. So, how bout you go hike your leg on their tree instead of whining petulantly about it to me, because they...not I have the answer to your red herring query. There are provocateurs who will sensationalize and distort these situation, not unlike you here...accusing me of implying you in bestiality. So I'll ask you your own question ...why must you "embellished with bulls**t? In your own words "Why fabricate misinformation like this?" But permit me to gently drag you back to the topic. Their low ball gossip mongering in no way detracts from CNN's threat. The clowns on reddit are behaving badly...oh boo hoo poor CNN. If you're gonna defend CNN then do it on the merits of their own actions, not someone elses. Uh..that's what I said essentailly. No, Not really. You emphasized that CNN had "no contact" with him which implies he was not prompted by CNN to write the apology but took it upon himself to do so because he "Saw the error of his ways" LOL. I pointed out it was likely CNN's attempt to contact him as his motive as opposed to having suddenly, on his own becoming remorse. But still, no evidence that they threatened him before hand.That is all speculation on your part. Besides, when most people do things that are morally questionable, they are aware of it Silly lil man. Speculation, maybe but speculation rooted in logic and the fact that CNN contacted him by e-mail. That's what triggered his fear. So tell me, in your statement regarding knowledge of questionable morality, should I conclude that you are aware that your false claim that I accused you of bestiality is morally questionable? LOL See how your silly red herring can come bacK to bite you in the ass? It seems as though we are in agreement with thse points..why do you continue to be so hostile? Geebus H Christ, son even when we agree, you can't resist a cheap shot. It's interesting you can't muster civility even when you perceive us to agree. Basically expressing the fantasy that I am hostile, in light of supposed agreement is in and of itself a hostile and defensive tactic. Are you holding some grudge we need to talk about little buddy? Let me know, otherwise I'll chalk it up to butthurt crybaby "comfort words". Jon Stewart was merciless in mocking CNN during his tenure..and his criticisms were a lot more pointed than a stupid gif and I don't recall them trying to blackmail him..and he had a bigger audience than this guy did. Ok. I'll send you five bucks and you can take that irrelevant nonsense to Starbucks for a lattee or something. LOL I agree that the wording is unfortunate, however I am still of the opinion that the severity of this has been overstated. A tempest in a teacup. What No cheap shot about my emotional state? Actually, it is. News stories on this are dropping off and I venture that by this time next week no one will be talking about it People won't forget. It will come up again and again. And when It does I'm sure you'll be there defending the despicable behavior of the CNN execs. You're very useful. So..you are free to speculate about motives when it suits your little crusade here but then you get testy if I ask questions? At risk of provoking you further, I would like to suggest that perhaps, you are a wee bit too invested in this. Fap Fap Fap Hold on to that fantasy Tik. You really should stick to memes and jerk off gifs sonny boy, cause you really suck at this. ![]() |
| Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated. | |
![]() |
|
| Mr. Tik | Jul 11 2017, 10:24 PM Post #126 |
![]()
|
I sincerely apologize if you feel that I mischaracterized your narrative.If I had known it would be this upsetting to you, I would have worded it differently.The fact that you would resort to implications on my part regarding beastialty indicates just how offended you were and I will endeavor to be more considerate in the future. Oh my..My twitch little friend. That's amusing, but return to my post and show me where I implicated you in any way of bestiality. No such implication was made. Tell me....What part of "CNN is the chicken f@cker" eluded you. But did it truly elude you? or are you merely triggered into presenting yet another red herring? Will you never learn? Are you comforted by the fantasy that you think you can actually upset me? That's so precious. LOL As Shakespeare would say.."Thou doth protest too much" So..my speculating is irrelevant but your's is not...hmmm kinda like them yabbuts..you can yabbut till the cows come home while calling out yabbuts from your debate opponents. I am not implying that there is some "age of consent", but rather that this narrative must not be too solid that the ankle biters here feel that they have to appeal to emotion to be persuasive. "ohhh..the big mean CNN are hounding a poor widdle 15 year old boy!!!!! ( or nine years old girl, depending on the "source"). btw the "misreporting" came from hans fellow trolls on reddit (unreliable sources) and thus was propagated by the people making hay about this..including Trump's son and some right wing media outlets. Ok. Well it appears you've identified the source of the mis-information. So, how bout you go hike your leg on their tree instead of whining petulantly about it to me, because they...not I have the answer to your red herring query. There are provocateurs who will sensationalize and distort these situation, not unlike you here...accusing me of implying you in bestiality. So I'll ask you your own question ...why must you "embellished with bulls**t? In your own words "Why fabricate misinformation like this?" But permit me to gently drag you back to the topic. Their low ball gossip mongering in no way detracts from CNN's threat. The clowns on reddit are behaving badly...oh boo hoo poor CNN. If you're gonna defend CNN then do it on the merits of their own actions, not someone elses. I am merely elucidating the degrees of culmany and overreaction to this kerfluffle I am not here to enable your melodramatic tendencies. Uh..that's what I said essentailly. No, Not really. You emphasized that CNN had "no contact" with him which implies he was not prompted by CNN to write the apology but took it upon himself to do so because he "Saw the error of his ways" LOL. I pointed out it was likely CNN's attempt to contact him as his motive as opposed to having suddenly, on his own becoming remorse. But still, no evidence that they threatened him before hand.That is all speculation on your part. Besides, when most people do things that are morally questionable, they are aware of it Silly lil man. Speculation, maybe but speculation rooted in logic and the fact that CNN contacted him by e-mail. Again..no proof whatsoever that there was any threat in this contact..the rest is merely informed by your bias. That's what triggered his fear. So tell me, in your statement regarding knowledge of questionable morality, should I conclude that you are aware that your false claim that I accused you of bestiality is morally questionable? LOL See how your silly red herring can come bacK to bite you in the ass? Your quote "It doesn't matter if you f@ck the ugly chicken or the pretty chicken. Either way you're a chicken f@cker". I have been called a lot of things..but chicken f@cker?..How can that not be construed as hostile? Of course, your speculation is always based on "logic" just like your copious yabbuts are based on "comparative analysis". It seems as though we are in agreement with thse points..why do you continue to be so hostile? Geebus H Christ, son even when we agree, you can't resist a cheap shot. It's interesting you can't muster civility even when you perceive us to agree. Basically expressing the fantasy that I am hostile, in light of supposed agreement is in and of itself a hostile and defensive tactic. Are you holding some grudge we need to talk about little buddy? Let me know, otherwise I'll chalk it up to butthurt crybaby "comfort words". "Butthurt crybaby"..if that's not hostile..then what is? Jon Stewart was merciless in mocking CNN during his tenure..and his criticisms were a lot more pointed than a stupid gif and I don't recall them trying to blackmail him..and he had a bigger audience than this guy did. Ok. I'll send you five bucks and you can take that irrelevant nonsense to Starbucks for a lattee or something. LOL Well, you say that CNN attacks anyone who as you put it "dares to mock them" Can you provide other examples of CNN muscling critics and "mockers"? and FYI..my preferred coffee drink of choice is a double redeye with cream and honey. I agree that the wording is unfortunate, however I am still of the opinion that the severity of this has been overstated. A tempest in a teacup. What No cheap shot about my emotional state? You sound disappointed. Maybe if I dress up as a dominatrix, I could mollify your faux outrage with some disipline Actually, it is. News stories on this are dropping off and I venture that by this time next week no one will be talking about it People won't forget. It will come up again and again. LOL..Esto, clone and the rest of your cohorts have already abandoned this thread for whatever new shiny object snares their propagandering. Though I am sure you will keep bringing it up. And when It does I'm sure you'll be there defending the despicable behavior of the CNN execs. You're very useful. Appeal to emotion fallacy. So..you are free to speculate about motives when it suits your little crusade here but then you get testy if I ask questions? At risk of provoking you further, I would like to suggest that perhaps, you are a wee bit too invested in this. Fap Fap Fap Hold on to that fantasy Tik. You seem awfully passionate about this rather prosaic ballyhoo, stomping around in petulant exasperation. You really should stick to memes and jerk off gifs sonny boy, cause you really suck at this. Then you will invariably piss and moan about that.. unless of course, I switch over and stop picking on your homies. ![]() "oh Tik...yabbut..tik..fap fap yabbut..uh ergh" |
|
You may be a conservative republican..if you are pro life until you get your mistress knocked up | |
![]() |
|
| The Inquisitor | Jul 11 2017, 10:49 PM Post #127 |
![]()
|
Hope your chickens aren't feeling neglected?
|
| Warning....Leftist's Post Here....Take Precautions | |
![]() |
|
| Mr. Tik | Jul 11 2017, 11:54 PM Post #128 |
![]()
|
Oh look..inquisitor needs attention |
|
You may be a conservative republican..if you are pro life until you get your mistress knocked up | |
![]() |
|
| estonianman | Jul 12 2017, 01:30 AM Post #129 |
![]()
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c0L6ewKv8g |
| MEEK AND MILD | |
![]() |
|
| estonianman | Jul 12 2017, 01:36 AM Post #130 |
![]()
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQMShmrfJWQ |
| MEEK AND MILD | |
![]() |
|
| ringotuna | Jul 12 2017, 04:37 AM Post #131 |
|
I am merely elucidating the degrees of culmany and overreaction to this kerfluffle I am not here to enable your melodramatic tendencies. I know, you're here to amuse me with your clownish antics. I thought you knew that. Curse my soul, I do very much enjoy squeezing your head and watching you sh!t yourself. And if you mean "calumny" excuse me while I chuckle at the irony of your characterization in light of your false accusations that I accused you of chicken fu@king. Again..no proof whatsoever that there was any threat in this contact..the rest is merely informed by your bias. The email itself was the intimidation. You said yourself, you'd be "sh!tting bricks" Your quote "It doesn't matter if you f@ck the ugly chicken or the pretty chicken. Either way you're a chicken f@cker". I have been called a lot of things..but chicken f@cker?..How can that not be construed as hostile? Touched a nerve..have I? I suppose by a stretch of the imagination, to one with a weak and sensitive ego it might be misinterpreted as hostile, but the fact is I didn't call you a chicken f@cker Tik. You need to suck it up and face that reality. We both know that, so stop lying. In fact, knowing you'd likely pull this cheap crap, I was very specific to point out it referred to CNN. It's quite amusing, watching you fabricate a red herring then go about acting incensed over your own fabrication. In short my friend. You've made up a lie in order to whine about it. "Butthurt crybaby"..if that's not hostile..then what is? More whining? Boy I really scobbed your noggin on that one didn't I....No it's an honest opinion , which is further supported by your perception that it's hostile. Thanks for the confirmation. Well, you say that CNN attacks anyone who as you put it "dares to mock them" Can you provide other examples of CNN muscling critics and "mockers"? So you're reduced to nit-picking the word "anyone" now? How desperate are you? and FYI..my preferred coffee drink of choice is a double redeye with cream and honey. [/b] Hold on. I'll check my givash!tter....nope nothing there. You sound disappointed. Maybe if I dress up as a dominatrix, I could mollify your faux outrage with some disipline No, not at all, just noting the rare deviation from your usual skeezy attempts to deflect from the conversation when confronted with facts and opinions you can't deal with. It's certainly not my place to judge you for your cross dressing fetish. Knock yourself out princess. LOL..Esto, clone and the rest of your cohorts have already abandoned this thread for whatever new shiny object snares their propagandering. <shrug> And yet you remain, desperately hanging on my every word, looking for some way to save face. Though I am sure you will keep bringing it up. When it's applicable and germane to the discussion, yes. And I'm sure you'll bring it up when you need a deflection. Appeal to emotion fallacy. LOL, learn your fallacies Tik. This isn't kindergarten. You seem awfully passionate about this rather prosaic ballyhoo, stomping around in petulant exasperation. Yanking your chain is hardly exasperating. It really takes little effort at all. Your projection is yet another school yard defense mechanism. You're getting desperate there sonny boy. Very sad to once again watch you take such a low road departure from what otherwise would be an interesting conversation. But we all know the narrow limits of your modus operandi. Then you will invariably piss and moan about that.. unless of course, I switch over and stop picking on your homies. Troll them all you like. It's none of my business. You keep draggin them into this. Have they bruised your fragile ego as well? "oh Tik...yabbut..tik..fap fap yabbut..uh ergh" PeeWee Herman would be proud of you. |
| Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated. | |
![]() |
|
| clone | Jul 12 2017, 06:28 PM Post #132 |
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
|
^^^ Thanks for making me look up the word "culmany" ......
|
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence. | |
![]() |
|
| Mr. Tik | Jul 13 2017, 01:23 AM Post #133 |
![]()
|
Oh wahhhh, whaaaaaaaah....have posted two..maybe three threads on legal cannabis and Sessions this year. If posted as many as you with your fake news threads then you would have something to wank about
|
|
You may be a conservative republican..if you are pro life until you get your mistress knocked up | |
![]() |
|
| estonianman | Jul 13 2017, 07:14 PM Post #134 |
![]()
|
|
| MEEK AND MILD | |
![]() |
|
| clone | Jul 14 2017, 10:25 AM Post #135 |
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
|
|
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence. | |
![]() |
|
| estonianman | Jul 14 2017, 12:53 PM Post #136 |
![]()
|
|
| MEEK AND MILD | |
![]() |
|
| clone | Jul 14 2017, 04:33 PM Post #137 |
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
|
CNN and the media trying to understand Trump's election.
|
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence. | |
![]() |
|
| clone | Jul 14 2017, 04:37 PM Post #138 |
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
|
|
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence. | |
![]() |
|
| estonianman | Jul 14 2017, 10:50 PM Post #139 |
![]()
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKdIz9gP1uI
Edited by estonianman, Jul 14 2017, 10:50 PM.
|
| MEEK AND MILD | |
![]() |
|
| Mr. Tik | Jul 14 2017, 11:32 PM Post #140 |
![]()
|
|
|
You may be a conservative republican..if you are pro life until you get your mistress knocked up | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · MFAB · Next Topic » |











And if you mean "calumny" excuse me while I chuckle at the irony of your characterization in light of your false accusations that I accused you of chicken fu@king.

8:41 PM Jul 10