Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Evidence Thread
Topic Started: Jul 11 2017, 10:42 AM (1,181 Views)
estonianman
Member Avatar

wilmywood8455
Jul 12 2017, 09:19 PM
estonianman
Jul 11 2017, 05:17 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 11 2017, 05:14 PM
estonianman
Jul 11 2017, 05:12 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 11 2017, 05:09 PM
I'm not aware that anyone from the intelligence community, the justice department or the Congress are members here, so until they're ready to reveal what they have, your cute little weak attempt at a 'gotcha' will go unresponded to.
Thank you for admitting what others cannot - there is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server OVER A YEAR AGO.
I did not do that, and I'll thank you to not put words in my mouth. My post was quite clear, and attempting to prostitute it to bolster your so-called arguments is weak at best.

Your post was essentially "we'll see what happens". All I asked was for one shred of evidence to substantiate what this entire scandal is predicated on - you admitted it doesn't exist yet.
I did no such thing. I said that the people who would have access to such evidence don't post here.

Stop putting words in my mouth. It's apparently the only way you think you can 'win'.

Then why are you concluding that the Russians hacked the DNC server?
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Right-Wing
Member Avatar

BuckFan
Jul 12 2017, 08:04 PM
Crowdsource is a public example of the evidence against the Russians. Want to discredit it? Fine.

The fact is the IC also says that it is conclusive that the Russians hacked the DNC and Podesta emails. Their evidence is classified so we will not see it for years but they have shown it to Republican Congressmen, who have every reason to no believe it, and convinced them the story is true.

Esto continues to ignore this fact. The GOP Congressional leadership is not questioning the evidence. His only point, repeated over and over, is that the evidence is not public so he hasn't seen it. There are a lot of cases and investigations where the evidence is never made public. Court files are sealed. Government investigations are classified. Esto would have us believe that makes all those cases false too.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/24/crowdstrike-five-things-everyone-is-ignoring-about-the-russia-dnc-story/
Donald Trump is Barack Obama's President!
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

So the snowflakes are basing a Trump impeachment based on evidence that doesn't exist for a crime they cannot name.


Is that about right? :dunno:
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

Robertr2000
Jul 13 2017, 10:28 AM
So the snowflakes are basing a Trump impeachment based on evidence that doesn't exist for a crime they cannot name.


Is that about right? :dunno:
They are perpetual liars.
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

estonianman
Jul 12 2017, 09:44 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 12 2017, 09:19 PM
estonianman
Jul 11 2017, 05:17 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 11 2017, 05:14 PM
estonianman
Jul 11 2017, 05:12 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
I did not do that, and I'll thank you to not put words in my mouth. My post was quite clear, and attempting to prostitute it to bolster your so-called arguments is weak at best.

Your post was essentially "we'll see what happens". All I asked was for one shred of evidence to substantiate what this entire scandal is predicated on - you admitted it doesn't exist yet.
I did no such thing. I said that the people who would have access to such evidence don't post here.

Stop putting words in my mouth. It's apparently the only way you think you can 'win'.

Then why are you concluding that the Russians hacked the DNC server?
When did I conclude that? Never, that's when. I've been preaching patience waiting on the truth all along. Doesn't mean I don't appreciate the drip drip drip, it's FUN :biggrin:

Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

wilmywood8455
Jul 13 2017, 12:38 PM
estonianman
Jul 12 2017, 09:44 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 12 2017, 09:19 PM
estonianman
Jul 11 2017, 05:17 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 11 2017, 05:14 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Your post was essentially "we'll see what happens". All I asked was for one shred of evidence to substantiate what this entire scandal is predicated on - you admitted it doesn't exist yet.
I did no such thing. I said that the people who would have access to such evidence don't post here.

Stop putting words in my mouth. It's apparently the only way you think you can 'win'.

Then why are you concluding that the Russians hacked the DNC server?
When did I conclude that? Never, that's when. I've been preaching patience waiting on the truth all along. Doesn't mean I don't appreciate the drip drip drip, it's FUN :biggrin:

Just admit that this entire thing is a politically motivated witch hunt and we can move on.
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

I am correct. Everything is predicated on the baseless allegation that the Russians remotely hacked the DNC server.

http://unitedstates.com/topic/10251474/1/
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
clone
Member Avatar
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
estonianman
Jul 12 2017, 05:20 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 12 2017, 04:56 PM
estonianman
Jul 11 2017, 05:17 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 11 2017, 05:14 PM
estonianman
Jul 11 2017, 05:12 PM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
I did not do that, and I'll thank you to not put words in my mouth. My post was quite clear, and attempting to prostitute it to bolster your so-called arguments is weak at best.

Your post was essentially "we'll see what happens". All I asked was for one shred of evidence to substantiate what this entire scandal is predicated on - you admitted it doesn't exist yet.

Let me change the question for you - if it is found that the Russians didn't hack the DNC server - would you consider that significant?
No. that has zero to do with Trump's obstruction and JRs meeting for dirt on HRC, where he expected to receive something of value, evidence damaging to her.

This thread isn't about obstruction of justice or Jr doing opposition research with a civilian from Russia.

This thread is addressing the claim that the DNC server was remotely hacked by the Russian Government - a claim that we repeatedly hear from Democrats as well as some Republicans.

This claim is based on zero evidence, as we can see by the non-responses on this thread.
Posted Image
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

I guess the democrats are done here - moving on

Checkmate
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Checkmate. Pfffft. You are very full of yourself, hypocrite.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

wilmywood8455
Jul 15 2017, 04:38 PM
Checkmate. Pfffft. You are very full of yourself, hypocrite.
Oh yeah? do you have something new to present?
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

[twitter=https://twitter.com/CraigMurrayOrg/status/809233064576634882]
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Nobody but you is still talking about the Russians hacking the DNC.

And your FORMER and retired 'lntel vets' have no knowledge of what the current intel have seen.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

wilmywood8455
Jul 17 2017, 03:38 PM
Nobody but you is still talking about the Russians hacking the DNC.

And your FORMER and retired 'lntel vets' have no knowledge of what the current intel have seen.
Pretty much everyone on the left, on this forum claim that the Russians hacked the election, hacked the DNC.

Cautionary Tales, Buckfan (who tried to defend the Russian hack theory in this thread, and failed) state this like it is common knowledge.
Edited by estonianman, Jul 17 2017, 03:50 PM.
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
truth2p0wer

estonianman
Jul 11 2017, 05:12 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 11 2017, 05:09 PM
I'm not aware that anyone from the intelligence community, the justice department or the Congress are members here, so until they're ready to reveal what they have, your cute little weak attempt at a 'gotcha' will go unresponded to.
Thank you for admitting what others cannot - there is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server OVER A YEAR AGO.

Thank you for ignoring the fact that during an ongoing investigation it is SOP to not reveal the things found by said investigation until charges are ready to be filed. But you know what the hell do facts matter when the Trumptards are ruled by their emotions.
Anytime we mention our condition, our history or existence, they callin it reverse racism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

truth2p0wer
Jul 17 2017, 04:15 PM
estonianman
Jul 11 2017, 05:12 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 11 2017, 05:09 PM
I'm not aware that anyone from the intelligence community, the justice department or the Congress are members here, so until they're ready to reveal what they have, your cute little weak attempt at a 'gotcha' will go unresponded to.
Thank you for admitting what others cannot - there is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server OVER A YEAR AGO.

Thank you for ignoring the fact that during an ongoing investigation it is SOP to not reveal the things found by said investigation until charges are ready to be filed. But you know what the hell do facts matter when the Trumptards are ruled by their emotions.
So you are saying the left lacks evidence to support their claims? Thank you and yes, I agree

Too bad you had to use your second SYI to make the point though.
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
clone
Member Avatar
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
estonianman
Jul 15 2017, 05:50 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 15 2017, 04:38 PM
Checkmate. Pfffft. You are very full of yourself, hypocrite.
Oh yeah? do you have something new to present?
We live in an era where loyalty to ideology on the left has superseded loyalty to America. Shameful.

:spank:
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
BuckFan

estonianman
Jul 12 2017, 08:12 PM
BuckFan
Jul 12 2017, 08:04 PM
Crowdsource is a public example of the evidence against the Russians. Want to discredit it? Fine.

The fact is the IC also says that it is conclusive that the Russians hacked the DNC and Podesta emails. Their evidence is classified so we will not see it for years but they have shown it to Republican Congressmen, who have every reason to no believe it, and convinced them the story is true.

Esto continues to ignore this fact. The GOP Congressional leadership is not questioning the evidence. His only point, repeated over and over, is that the evidence is not public so he hasn't seen it. There are a lot of cases and investigations where the evidence is never made public. Court files are sealed. Government investigations are classified. Esto would have us believe that makes all those cases false too.
We are back to the retracted and irrelevant DNI report.

The IC said that the Russians tried to manipulate the election in general - they never said anything about the DNC server which they were denied access to.
Wrong once again. You have a good track record there.

The DNI report specifically said that Wikileaks received stolen (hacked) material from Russian intelligence.

https://www.wired.com/2017/01/feds-damning-report-russian-election-hack-wont-convince-skeptics/

You really should study up on what you post about. Being wrong so much is just embarrassing. Do you like going through life ignorant?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
BuckFan

estonianman
Jul 17 2017, 03:47 PM
wilmywood8455
Jul 17 2017, 03:38 PM
Nobody but you is still talking about the Russians hacking the DNC.

And your FORMER and retired 'lntel vets' have no knowledge of what the current intel have seen.
Pretty much everyone on the left, on this forum claim that the Russians hacked the election, hacked the DNC.

Cautionary Tales, Buckfan (who tried to defend the Russian hack theory in this thread, and failed) state this like it is common knowledge.
Nobody is questioning the Russian hacking except you. Even Trump is slowly admitting they were behind the hacking. You are becoming very lonely on that island.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

BuckFan
Jul 17 2017, 04:51 PM
estonianman
Jul 12 2017, 08:12 PM
BuckFan
Jul 12 2017, 08:04 PM
Crowdsource is a public example of the evidence against the Russians. Want to discredit it? Fine.

The fact is the IC also says that it is conclusive that the Russians hacked the DNC and Podesta emails. Their evidence is classified so we will not see it for years but they have shown it to Republican Congressmen, who have every reason to no believe it, and convinced them the story is true.

Esto continues to ignore this fact. The GOP Congressional leadership is not questioning the evidence. His only point, repeated over and over, is that the evidence is not public so he hasn't seen it. There are a lot of cases and investigations where the evidence is never made public. Court files are sealed. Government investigations are classified. Esto would have us believe that makes all those cases false too.
We are back to the retracted and irrelevant DNI report.

The IC said that the Russians tried to manipulate the election in general - they never said anything about the DNC server which they were denied access to.
Wrong once again. You have a good track record there.

The DNI report specifically said that Wikileaks received stolen (hacked) material from Russian intelligence.

https://www.wired.com/2017/01/feds-damning-report-russian-election-hack-wont-convince-skeptics/

You really should study up on what you post about. Being wrong so much is just embarrassing. Do you like going through life ignorant?
The DNI report is BS, fluff actually.

The FBI had no access to the server after the attack.
Edited by estonianman, Jul 17 2017, 09:11 PM.
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Learn More · Register for Free
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply