Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
'Dunkirk' critics mocked for slamming the movie's cast
Topic Started: Aug 1 2017, 06:38 PM (973 Views)
ringotuna
Member Avatar

Opinionated
Aug 4 2017, 08:47 AM
ringotuna
Aug 4 2017, 03:52 AM
Opinionated
Aug 3 2017, 11:43 AM
Demagogue
Aug 3 2017, 11:39 AM
Opinionated
Aug 3 2017, 11:23 AM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
I was not debating you. I was saying that I thought you misunderstood ringotuna's point. That or you were being purposely obtuse which is fine if you are seeking to debate a point. :cheers:
Tuna seemed to take my using mythology to argue that the is no basis for complaining about a lack of women's roles in Dunkirk to be invalid. Apparently my agreeing with him was just too much for him, so he felt the need to quibble about analogy I used to agree with him. :rollseyes:
I've no problem with you agreeing with me. A blind hog will occasionally find the acorn. Whether there is a consensus or not, your analogy is one of apples and oranges when comparing a historical event to a mythological story. Don't know why you'd be so offended that you make it personal. :dunno:

My analogy is fine. Since you agreed with my conclusion there was no point in trying to critic my analogy unless you just can't let anything I say go by without some kind of response.

And that's a "you" problem.
Your analogy sucked. As if comparing a Quarter horse to the mythical creature Pegasus had any validity. Don't know why ya gotta get all snippy and personal about it.

That's a "you" problem.
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Opinionated
Member Avatar

ringotuna
Aug 4 2017, 08:54 AM
Opinionated
Aug 4 2017, 08:47 AM
ringotuna
Aug 4 2017, 03:52 AM
Opinionated
Aug 3 2017, 11:43 AM
Demagogue
Aug 3 2017, 11:39 AM

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Tuna seemed to take my using mythology to argue that the is no basis for complaining about a lack of women's roles in Dunkirk to be invalid. Apparently my agreeing with him was just too much for him, so he felt the need to quibble about analogy I used to agree with him. :rollseyes:
I've no problem with you agreeing with me. A blind hog will occasionally find the acorn. Whether there is a consensus or not, your analogy is one of apples and oranges when comparing a historical event to a mythological story. Don't know why you'd be so offended that you make it personal. :dunno:

My analogy is fine. Since you agreed with my conclusion there was no point in trying to critic my analogy unless you just can't let anything I say go by without some kind of response.

And that's a "you" problem.
Your analogy sucked. As if comparing a Quarter horse to the mythical creature Pegasus had any validity. Don't know why ya gotta get all snippy and personal about it.

That's a "you" problem.
You are not the final arbitrator of what is and isn't a good analogy. So bite me.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ringotuna
Member Avatar

I disagree. :biggrin:
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

'So bite me' is my go-to 'just got my butt whipped so I give up' exclamation, too!
Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply