|
It’s Looks Likely That Trump Obstructed Justice
|
|
Topic Started: Jan 28 2018, 09:34 PM (231 Views)
|
|
La Pasionaria
|
Jan 28 2018, 09:34 PM
Post #1
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,724
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2016
|
With each passing day the future looks increasingly gloomy for D.J. Trump.
It may just be a matter of time before the leadership of the G.O.P. approaches Trump and tells him, "it's all over."
It’s Now Likely Mueller Thinks Trump Obstructed Justice http://politi.co/2DEdgHf
"The case against Trump has grown stronger in recent months, and it now appears likely that Mueller will conclude that Trump obstructed justice.
That has not always been true. On June 8, 2017, soon after former FBI director James Comey testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, I told the New York Times, “Based only on what we know now in public, a reasonable prosecutor might bring this case against an ordinary person, but a prudent prosecutor would want more facts before bringing this case against a president....We have since learned of very substantial additional evidence that would rebut that defense, or a defense that Trump didn’t understand the consequences of firing Comey. While that evidence is indirect, Mueller could argue that we can infer Trump’s intent from that evidence, which is how prosecutors typically prove a defendant’s intent....Trump’s desire to fire Mueller despite knowing that firing a law enforcement official overseeing the Russia investigation could raise obstruction concerns is strong evidence that Trump’s intent was to obstruct the investigation. The excuses offered by Trump also bolster Mueller’s case, because they indicate that the president realized that firing Mueller to impede the investigation would be perceived as wrongful.
....Thursday’s news made impeachment proceedings against Trump more likely. Ultimately the president’s performance in his upcoming interview with Mueller could prove decisive. Trump has repeatedly demonstrated a lack of discipline when questioned, and Mueller has a lot to work with. If Trump provides the special counsel with direct evidence of his intent when firing Comey, he could ensure that Mueller will conclude he obstructed justice, leaving his fate to Congress."
The time for true Americans to stand up for their freedoms and demand Trump face the music is fast approaching, which side will you choose to be on?
|
|
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
Jan 28 2018, 10:40 PM
Post #2
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,174
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- La Pasionaria
- Jan 28 2018, 09:34 PM
With each passing day the future looks increasingly gloomy for D.J. Trump. It may just be a matter of time before the leadership of the G.O.P. approaches Trump and tells him, "it's all over." It’s Now Likely Mueller Thinks Trump Obstructed Justice http://politi.co/2DEdgHf "The case against Trump has grown stronger in recent months, and it now appears likely that Mueller will conclude that Trump obstructed justice. That has not always been true. On June 8, 2017, soon after former FBI director James Comey testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, I told the New York Times, “Based only on what we know now in public, a reasonable prosecutor might bring this case against an ordinary person, but a prudent prosecutor would want more facts before bringing this case against a president....We have since learned of very substantial additional evidence that would rebut that defense, or a defense that Trump didn’t understand the consequences of firing Comey. While that evidence is indirect, Mueller could argue that we can infer Trump’s intent from that evidence, which is how prosecutors typically prove a defendant’s intent....Trump’s desire to fire Mueller despite knowing that firing a law enforcement official overseeing the Russia investigation could raise obstruction concerns is strong evidence that Trump’s intent was to obstruct the investigation. The excuses offered by Trump also bolster Mueller’s case, because they indicate that the president realized that firing Mueller to impede the investigation would be perceived as wrongful. ....Thursday’s news made impeachment proceedings against Trump more likely. Ultimately the president’s performance in his upcoming interview with Mueller could prove decisive. Trump has repeatedly demonstrated a lack of discipline when questioned, and Mueller has a lot to work with. If Trump provides the special counsel with direct evidence of his intent when firing Comey, he could ensure that Mueller will conclude he obstructed justice, leaving his fate to Congress." The time for true Americans to stand up for their freedoms and demand Trump face the music is fast approaching, which side will you choose to be on?
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
Jan 28 2018, 11:06 PM
Post #3
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,174
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
Shall we summarize ???------
1) This is 2018, not 1973 2) Trump is not easy to scare into resigning, as he is not dependent on a government pension like Nixon was 3) Democrats don't have enough votes, nor will they after 2018, to get DACA let alone impeachment 4) Historically only Democrat Presidents get impeached 5) Trump did not order a criminal burglary or get a blowjob in the Oval Office 6) Impeachment is not a legal means to stage a coup 7) Trump can fire any executive branch official without any legislative oversight 8) Trump has an army of private attorneys and will go to HIS Supreme Court if necessary 9) Spreading Idle threats of impeachment is a sign of silliness and disloyalty to the American government 10) Democrats will dislike Pence more than they dislike Trump 11) One cannot obstruct justice when there is no justice 12) Liberal delusions of grandeur is a sign they have a mental disorder 13)The controlled media is not a branch of government :oyvey
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
Opinionated
|
Jan 28 2018, 11:10 PM
Post #4
|
|
- Posts:
- 11,398
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #10
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
Yes, well we'll see how this all works out.
|
|
|
| |
|
Alt Right PEPE
|
Jan 28 2018, 11:55 PM
Post #5
|
|
- Posts:
- 7,748
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #195
- Joined:
- May 14, 2016
|
The only "obstruction" is likely in your bowels
|
"Be polite, be friendly. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet." Gen Mattis
|
| |
|
La Pasionaria
|
Jan 29 2018, 12:08 AM
Post #6
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,724
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2016
|
- Robert Stout
- Jan 28 2018, 11:06 PM
Shall we summarize ???------
1) This is 2018, not 1973 2) Trump is not easy to scare into resigning, as he is not dependent on a government pension like Nixon was 3) Democrats don't have enough votes, nor will they after 2018, to get DACA let alone impeachment 4) Historically only Democrat Presidents get impeached 5) Trump did not order a criminal burglary or get a blowjob in the Oval Office 6) Impeachment is not a legal means to stage a coup 7) Trump can fire any executive branch official without any legislative oversight 8) Trump has an army of private attorneys and will go to HIS Supreme Court if necessary 9) Spreading Idle threats of impeachment is a sign of silliness and disloyalty to the American government 10) Democrats will dislike Pence more than they dislike Trump 11) One cannot obstruct justice when there is no justice 12) Liberal delusions of grandeur is a sign they have a mental disorder 13)The controlled media is not a branch of government :oyvey Trump's attack on the FBI is an attack on the US constitution itself | Jill Abramson https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jan/27/trump-fbi-us-constitution
"I await Mueller’s findings of whether the president broke the law in dealing with Russia and the fallout of the election. Only he has anything approaching the full picture. That’s why upholding the legitimacy of his investigation – and investigators – is so important.
As the Republicans continue their campaign to discredit the FBI, it’s important to remember a piece of history. Without Deep Throat, the Washington Post’s secret source, the Watergate scandal might never have been exposed. Deep Throat, we learned in 2012, was Mark Felt, the No2 official at the FBI.
The constitution owes him, and those who have followed in his footsteps, a giant debt of gratitude."
|
|
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
Jan 29 2018, 12:21 AM
Post #7
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,174
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- La Pasionaria
- Jan 29 2018, 12:08 AM
- Robert Stout
- Jan 28 2018, 11:06 PM
Shall we summarize ???------
1) This is 2018, not 1973 2) Trump is not easy to scare into resigning, as he is not dependent on a government pension like Nixon was 3) Democrats don't have enough votes, nor will they after 2018, to get DACA let alone impeachment 4) Historically only Democrat Presidents get impeached 5) Trump did not order a criminal burglary or get a blowjob in the Oval Office 6) Impeachment is not a legal means to stage a coup 7) Trump can fire any executive branch official without any legislative oversight 8) Trump has an army of private attorneys and will go to HIS Supreme Court if necessary 9) Spreading Idle threats of impeachment is a sign of silliness and disloyalty to the American government 10) Democrats will dislike Pence more than they dislike Trump 11) One cannot obstruct justice when there is no justice 12) Liberal delusions of grandeur is a sign they have a mental disorder 13)The controlled media is not a branch of government :oyvey
Trump's attack on the FBI is an attack on the US constitution itself | Jill Abramson https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jan/27/trump-fbi-us-constitution"I await Mueller’s findings of whether the president broke the law in dealing with Russia and the fallout of the election. Only he has anything approaching the full picture. That’s why upholding the legitimacy of his investigation – and investigators – is so important. As the Republicans continue their campaign to discredit the FBI, it’s important to remember a piece of history. Without Deep Throat, the Washington Post’s secret source, the Watergate scandal might never have been exposed. Deep Throat, we learned in 2012, was Mark Felt, the No2 official at the FBI. The constitution owes him, and those who have followed in his footsteps, a giant debt of gratitude." I couldn't find any mention of the FBI in the Constitution, so how is Trump unconstitutionally attacking the FBI ???....My research found that a never married cross dresser with close ties with the Mafia created the FBI bureaucratic empire....You and the Guardian have some strange bedfellows...............
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
La Pasionaria
|
Jan 29 2018, 07:26 AM
Post #8
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,724
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2016
|
- Robert Stout
- Jan 29 2018, 12:21 AM
- La Pasionaria
- Jan 29 2018, 12:08 AM
- Robert Stout
- Jan 28 2018, 11:06 PM
Shall we summarize ???------
1) This is 2018, not 1973 2) Trump is not easy to scare into resigning, as he is not dependent on a government pension like Nixon was 3) Democrats don't have enough votes, nor will they after 2018, to get DACA let alone impeachment 4) Historically only Democrat Presidents get impeached 5) Trump did not order a criminal burglary or get a blowjob in the Oval Office 6) Impeachment is not a legal means to stage a coup 7) Trump can fire any executive branch official without any legislative oversight 8) Trump has an army of private attorneys and will go to HIS Supreme Court if necessary 9) Spreading Idle threats of impeachment is a sign of silliness and disloyalty to the American government 10) Democrats will dislike Pence more than they dislike Trump 11) One cannot obstruct justice when there is no justice 12) Liberal delusions of grandeur is a sign they have a mental disorder 13)The controlled media is not a branch of government :oyvey
Trump's attack on the FBI is an attack on the US constitution itself | Jill Abramson https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jan/27/trump-fbi-us-constitution"I await Mueller’s findings of whether the president broke the law in dealing with Russia and the fallout of the election. Only he has anything approaching the full picture. That’s why upholding the legitimacy of his investigation – and investigators – is so important. As the Republicans continue their campaign to discredit the FBI, it’s important to remember a piece of history. Without Deep Throat, the Washington Post’s secret source, the Watergate scandal might never have been exposed. Deep Throat, we learned in 2012, was Mark Felt, the No2 official at the FBI. The constitution owes him, and those who have followed in his footsteps, a giant debt of gratitude."
I couldn't find any mention of the FBI in the Constitution, so how is Trump unconstitutionally attacking the FBI ???....My research found that a never married cross dresser with close ties with the Mafia created the FBI bureaucratic empire....You and the Guardian have some strange bedfellows............... He's not at odds with the Constitution due to attacking the FBI, it revolves around his subverting the legal system of the USA.
|
|
|
| |
|
La Pasionaria
|
Feb 1 2018, 11:18 PM
Post #9
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,724
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2016
|
- Alt Right PEPE
- Jan 28 2018, 11:55 PM
The only "obstruction" is likely in your bowels All one can do now is laugh:
Controversial FBI agent co-wrote Comey draft @CNNPolitics http://cnn.it/2nvsEei
"BREAKING: Peter Strzok, the FBI agent accused by GOP of having "treasonous" anti-Trump bias, supported re-opening the Clinton email investigation in fall 2016 and helped write the letter (signed by Comey) that was released days before the election."
|
|
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
Feb 2 2018, 04:08 AM
Post #10
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,174
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- La Pasionaria
- Feb 1 2018, 11:18 PM
- Alt Right PEPE
- Jan 28 2018, 11:55 PM
The only "obstruction" is likely in your bowels
All one can do now is laugh: Controversial FBI agent co-wrote Comey draft @CNNPolitics http://cnn.it/2nvsEei"BREAKING: Peter Strzok, the FBI agent accused by GOP of having "treasonous" anti-Trump bias, supported re-opening the Clinton email investigation in fall 2016 and helped write the letter (signed by Comey) that was released days before the election." Hindering Prosecution is a felony.............
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
La Pasionaria
|
Feb 13 2018, 05:01 PM
Post #11
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,724
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2016
|
- Robert Stout
- Feb 2 2018, 04:08 AM
- La Pasionaria
- Feb 1 2018, 11:18 PM
- Alt Right PEPE
- Jan 28 2018, 11:55 PM
The only "obstruction" is likely in your bowels
All one can do now is laugh: Controversial FBI agent co-wrote Comey draft @CNNPolitics http://cnn.it/2nvsEei"BREAKING: Peter Strzok, the FBI agent accused by GOP of having "treasonous" anti-Trump bias, supported re-opening the Clinton email investigation in fall 2016 and helped write the letter (signed by Comey) that was released days before the election."
Hindering Prosecution is a felony............. Yup, and I guess Trump may be charged with that too!
|
|
|
| |
|
Drudge X
|
Feb 13 2018, 05:14 PM
Post #12
|
|
- Posts:
- 14,719
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #11
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
Trump is justice.
|
|
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
|
| |
|
CautionaryTales
|
Feb 13 2018, 05:33 PM
Post #13
|
|
- Posts:
- 17,262
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- Drudge X
- Feb 13 2018, 05:14 PM
Trump is justice. He’s a crook
|
Have you paid your internet taxes?
|
| |
|
George Aligator
|
Feb 13 2018, 05:41 PM
Post #14
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,637
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #37
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
Obstruction has been the main charge in the last two impeachments. The case against Trump is strong because of his own public statements about firing Comey. The circumstantial evidence of his financial dealings with Russians are going to be a problem for his defense. He had a corrupt motive, certainly.
In the end, the impeachment vote is a political, not a judicial one. Unlike criminal judges, congressmen weigh their own political fortunes in the scales of justice along with the evidence presented by the prosecution. Republicans have gone to extraordinary lengths to protect their party from the consequences of impeaching Trump. The choice between justice and ambition is a tough one for a politician.
|
|
Conservatism is a social disease
|
| |
|
Robertr2000
|
Feb 13 2018, 06:16 PM
Post #15
|
|
- Posts:
- 12,361
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #43
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- La Pasionaria
- Jan 28 2018, 09:34 PM
With each passing day the future looks increasingly gloomy for D.J. Trump. It may just be a matter of time before the leadership of the G.O.P. approaches Trump and tells him, "it's all over." It’s Now Likely Mueller Thinks Trump Obstructed Justice http://politi.co/2DEdgHf "The case against Trump has grown stronger in recent months, and it now appears likely that Mueller will conclude that Trump obstructed justice. That has not always been true. On June 8, 2017, soon after former FBI director James Comey testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, I told the New York Times, “Based only on what we know now in public, a reasonable prosecutor might bring this case against an ordinary person, but a prudent prosecutor would want more facts before bringing this case against a president....We have since learned of very substantial additional evidence that would rebut that defense, or a defense that Trump didn’t understand the consequences of firing Comey. While that evidence is indirect, Mueller could argue that we can infer Trump’s intent from that evidence, which is how prosecutors typically prove a defendant’s intent....Trump’s desire to fire Mueller despite knowing that firing a law enforcement official overseeing the Russia investigation could raise obstruction concerns is strong evidence that Trump’s intent was to obstruct the investigation. The excuses offered by Trump also bolster Mueller’s case, because they indicate that the president realized that firing Mueller to impede the investigation would be perceived as wrongful. ....Thursday’s news made impeachment proceedings against Trump more likely. Ultimately the president’s performance in his upcoming interview with Mueller could prove decisive. Trump has repeatedly demonstrated a lack of discipline when questioned, and Mueller has a lot to work with. If Trump provides the special counsel with direct evidence of his intent when firing Comey, he could ensure that Mueller will conclude he obstructed justice, leaving his fate to Congress." The time for true Americans to stand up for their freedoms and demand Trump face the music is fast approaching, which side will you choose to be on? Does Mueller have anything on Trump/Russia or not?
Looks like not, cus he's going for "Obstruction" instead.
If that's the case? You won't get obstruction here. This thing is over.
|
|
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
Feb 14 2018, 01:30 AM
Post #16
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,174
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- Robertr2000
- Feb 13 2018, 06:16 PM
- La Pasionaria
- Jan 28 2018, 09:34 PM
With each passing day the future looks increasingly gloomy for D.J. Trump. It may just be a matter of time before the leadership of the G.O.P. approaches Trump and tells him, "it's all over." It’s Now Likely Mueller Thinks Trump Obstructed Justice http://politi.co/2DEdgHf "The case against Trump has grown stronger in recent months, and it now appears likely that Mueller will conclude that Trump obstructed justice. That has not always been true. On June 8, 2017, soon after former FBI director James Comey testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, I told the New York Times, “Based only on what we know now in public, a reasonable prosecutor might bring this case against an ordinary person, but a prudent prosecutor would want more facts before bringing this case against a president....We have since learned of very substantial additional evidence that would rebut that defense, or a defense that Trump didn’t understand the consequences of firing Comey. While that evidence is indirect, Mueller could argue that we can infer Trump’s intent from that evidence, which is how prosecutors typically prove a defendant’s intent....Trump’s desire to fire Mueller despite knowing that firing a law enforcement official overseeing the Russia investigation could raise obstruction concerns is strong evidence that Trump’s intent was to obstruct the investigation. The excuses offered by Trump also bolster Mueller’s case, because they indicate that the president realized that firing Mueller to impede the investigation would be perceived as wrongful. ....Thursday’s news made impeachment proceedings against Trump more likely. Ultimately the president’s performance in his upcoming interview with Mueller could prove decisive. Trump has repeatedly demonstrated a lack of discipline when questioned, and Mueller has a lot to work with. If Trump provides the special counsel with direct evidence of his intent when firing Comey, he could ensure that Mueller will conclude he obstructed justice, leaving his fate to Congress." The time for true Americans to stand up for their freedoms and demand Trump face the music is fast approaching, which side will you choose to be on? Does Mueller have anything on Trump/Russia or not?
Looks like not, cus he's going for "Obstruction" instead.
If that's the case? You won't get obstruction here. This thing is over. I have noticed that La Pasionaria doesn't say it is over until the Washington Post tells her it is over...Then she just doesn't talk about it anymore; like recounts, challenging electoral votes, visa restrictions, or massive women's marches in Pu**yhats.............
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
La Pasionaria
|
Feb 17 2018, 04:58 PM
Post #17
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,724
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2016
|
- Drudge X
- Feb 13 2018, 05:14 PM
Trump is justice. In what solar system?
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|