| Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Analysis: The quiet probe into Clinton email investigation could be a landmine for Robert Mueller | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 19 2018, 12:49 AM (102 Views) | |
| clone | Feb 19 2018, 12:49 AM Post #1 |
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
|
Analysis: The quiet probe into Clinton email investigation could be a landmine for Robert Mueller WASHINGTON — In early January, news that the Justice Department’s inspector general launched an investigation into the government's disputed handling of the Hillary Clinton email inquiry was quickly overtaken by the chaotic run-up to President Trump’s inauguration. Nearly a year later, Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s wide-ranging review of the FBI and Justice’s work in the politically-charged Clinton case now looms as a potential landmine for Russia special counsel Robert Mueller. For months, Horowitz’s investigation — which has amassed interviews with former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former FBI Director James Comey and other key officials — had been grinding on in near anonymity. That is, until earlier this month when the inspector general acknowledged that Mueller was alerted to a cache of text messages exchanged between two FBI officials on his staff that disparaged Trump. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/12/26/analysis-quiet-probe-into-clinton-email-investigation-could-landmine-robert-mueller/965396001/ |
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence. | |
![]() |
|
| Opinionated | Feb 19 2018, 03:54 AM Post #2 |
|
Coulda, woulda, shoulda. It doesn't mean anything until the "could" is removed. |
![]() |
|
| peewee | Feb 19 2018, 01:18 PM Post #3 |
|
I from time to time point this out. When a headline includes; "may", "could", "possible", "might", and other adverbs of possibility and yet many here and elsewhere latch on to them as if all else is said and done. |
![]() |
|
| clone | Feb 19 2018, 01:19 PM Post #4 |
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
|
Agreed, that's why unlike you people I put these articles under opinion NOT news.... |
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence. | |
![]() |
|
| peewee | Feb 19 2018, 02:36 PM Post #5 |
|
Then, well played, Clone! You are a true friend of the court. Dilly Dilly! (I have not seen a Bud Lite ad since the Super Bowl. What happened?) Edited by peewee, Feb 19 2018, 02:38 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| clone | Feb 19 2018, 02:58 PM Post #6 |
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
|
Not sure as I don't watch any TV with commercials... BTW if you are interested in my news/vs op-ed opinion you can find it here... http://perspectives.com/single/?p=10297404&t=10426374 |
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence. | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic » |






4:43 AM Jul 11