|
Giuliani: Trump reimbursed Cohen for $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels
|
|
Topic Started: May 2 2018, 10:32 PM (612 Views)
|
|
thoughtless
|
May 2 2018, 10:32 PM
Post #1
|
|
- Posts:
- 1,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #22
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) said Wednesday that President Trump reimbursed his personal attorney Michael Cohen the $130,000 paid to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to stay quiet about their alleged affair.
Giuliani, who recently joined Trump’s legal team, told Fox News’s Sean Hannity that the payment was “perfectly legal” and was “not campaign money,” meaning the arrangement didn’t violate campaign finance law.
“Funneled through a law firm, and the president repaid it,” Giuliani said.
LINK
|
|
Without geometry, life is pointless.
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
May 2 2018, 10:34 PM
Post #2
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,174
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
Stormy's big mouth suggests she must repay the $130,000..............
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
thoughtless
|
May 2 2018, 10:34 PM
Post #3
|
|
- Posts:
- 1,684
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #22
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
Maybe Trump needs to find a better lawyer.
|
|
Without geometry, life is pointless.
|
| |
|
70-101
|
May 2 2018, 10:47 PM
Post #4
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,675
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #6
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
Rudy just threw Trump under the bus, it now appears at the very minimum there may have been bank fraud involved here. Due to Trump paying back Cohen over the course of months instead of just one payment in an attempt to skirt Federal banking laws - which is a very serious matter
|
|
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
May 2 2018, 10:50 PM
Post #5
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,174
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 10:47 PM
Rudy just threw Trump under the bus, it now appears at the very minimum there may have been bank fraud involved here. Due to Trump paying back Cohen over the course of months instead of just one payment in an attempt to skirt Federal banking laws - which is a very serious matter I will remember this when I owe money to my lawyers..........
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
|
peewee
|
May 2 2018, 11:05 PM
Post #6
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,942
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #218
- Joined:
- May 29, 2016
|
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 10:47 PM
Rudy just threw Trump under the bus, it now appears at the very minimum there may have been bank fraud involved here. Due to Trump paying back Cohen over the course of months instead of just one payment in an attempt to skirt Federal banking laws - which is a very serious matter No bank fraud. If paying someone money over a period of months instead of one lump sum is not an attempt to skirt anything. How would anyone be able to make a car, home, or any other loan payment? Your on going hate for Trump has completely clouded your sense of logic and reason. Clown, I have alluded to time and again on this forum that I move ten, twenty, thirty...times or more in cash than this $130,000 daily for the company that I work for This would not even cause a blink in a banking environment. Unless there was something else, such as a money transaction by a foreign actor or something that unnaturally appeared to reoccur. My expert opinion says...move along nothing to see here folks.
|
|
|
| |
|
Right-Wing
|
May 2 2018, 11:08 PM
Post #7
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,652
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #118
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
So now that they can't get Trump on a campaign violation for this...what will they try next? Anything, anything? After all, we don't investigate crimes in this country anymore, we investigate people.
|
|
Donald Trump is Barack Obama's President!
|
| |
|
The Inquisitor
|
May 2 2018, 11:12 PM
Post #8
|
|
- Posts:
- 10,780
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #472
- Joined:
- Feb 25, 2017
|
This will keep 70-101 and C2c entertained for a couple of months.... :oyvey
|
|
Warning....Leftist's Post Here....Take Precautions
|
| |
|
peewee
|
May 2 2018, 11:12 PM
Post #9
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,942
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #218
- Joined:
- May 29, 2016
|
- Right-Wing
- May 2 2018, 11:08 PM
So now that they can't get Trump on a campaign violation for this...what will they try next? Anything, anything? After all, we don't investigate crimes in this country anymore, we investigate people. Trump is the new Hillary Years of investigations and nothing will come of it. Trump is good until at least 2024.
|
|
|
| |
|
70-101
|
May 2 2018, 11:19 PM
Post #10
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,675
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #6
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:05 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 10:47 PM
Rudy just threw Trump under the bus, it now appears at the very minimum there may have been bank fraud involved here. Due to Trump paying back Cohen over the course of months instead of just one payment in an attempt to skirt Federal banking laws - which is a very serious matter
No bank fraud. If paying someone money over a period of months instead of one lump sum is not an attempt to skirt anything. How would anyone be able to make a car, home, or any other loan payment? Your on going hate for Trump has completely clouded your sense of logic and reason. Clown, I have alluded to time and again on this forum that I move ten, twenty, thirty...times or more in cash than this $130,000 daily for the company that I work for This would not even cause a blink in a banking environment. Unless there was something else, such as a money transaction by a foreign actor or something that unnaturally appeared to reoccur. My expert opinion says...move along nothing to see here folks. Cash transactions intentionally structured to be under $10,000 is against the law, it's called 'Structuring'' Structuring transactions to evade the Bank Secrecy Act can result in civil and criminal penalties under the BSA. You sure you're a banker? If so I hope you have lots of help
|
|
|
| |
|
peewee
|
May 2 2018, 11:34 PM
Post #11
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,942
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #218
- Joined:
- May 29, 2016
|
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:19 PM
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:05 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 10:47 PM
Rudy just threw Trump under the bus, it now appears at the very minimum there may have been bank fraud involved here. Due to Trump paying back Cohen over the course of months instead of just one payment in an attempt to skirt Federal banking laws - which is a very serious matter
No bank fraud. If paying someone money over a period of months instead of one lump sum is not an attempt to skirt anything. How would anyone be able to make a car, home, or any other loan payment? Your on going hate for Trump has completely clouded your sense of logic and reason. Clown, I have alluded to time and again on this forum that I move ten, twenty, thirty...times or more in cash than this $130,000 daily for the company that I work for This would not even cause a blink in a banking environment. Unless there was something else, such as a money transaction by a foreign actor or something that unnaturally appeared to reoccur. My expert opinion says...move along nothing to see here folks.
Cash transactions intentionally structured to be under $10,000 is against the law, it's called 'Structuring'' Structuring transactions to evade the Bank Secrecy Act can result in civil and criminal penalties under the BSA. You sure you're a banker? If so I hope you have lots of help I did not say that I was a banker. I said that was an expert in this area, for years and years. You made an assumption but claimed it to be fact. I want to see your source that documents the 10K. Also the CTR, look it up, that had to be filed by Trump's bank would have picked this up when the transactions occurred, not after the fact. CTR is the key. The 10K only relates to currency. Where anywhere did you find that Trump repaid to his lawyer the 130k in cash in sums less than 10K each time? If you cannot document that for us they you have nothing.
|
|
|
| |
|
Right-Wing
|
May 2 2018, 11:36 PM
Post #12
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,652
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #118
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:19 PM
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:05 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 10:47 PM
Rudy just threw Trump under the bus, it now appears at the very minimum there may have been bank fraud involved here. Due to Trump paying back Cohen over the course of months instead of just one payment in an attempt to skirt Federal banking laws - which is a very serious matter
No bank fraud. If paying someone money over a period of months instead of one lump sum is not an attempt to skirt anything. How would anyone be able to make a car, home, or any other loan payment? Your on going hate for Trump has completely clouded your sense of logic and reason. Clown, I have alluded to time and again on this forum that I move ten, twenty, thirty...times or more in cash than this $130,000 daily for the company that I work for This would not even cause a blink in a banking environment. Unless there was something else, such as a money transaction by a foreign actor or something that unnaturally appeared to reoccur. My expert opinion says...move along nothing to see here folks.
Cash transactions intentionally structured to be under $10,000 is against the law, it's called 'Structuring'' Structuring transactions to evade the Bank Secrecy Act can result in civil and criminal penalties under the BSA. You sure you're a banker? If so I hope you have lots of help Do you know how the payment was made? How many installments and at what amounts?
|
|
Donald Trump is Barack Obama's President!
|
| |
|
peewee
|
May 2 2018, 11:46 PM
Post #13
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,942
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #218
- Joined:
- May 29, 2016
|
- Right-Wing
- May 2 2018, 11:36 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:19 PM
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:05 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 10:47 PM
Rudy just threw Trump under the bus, it now appears at the very minimum there may have been bank fraud involved here. Due to Trump paying back Cohen over the course of months instead of just one payment in an attempt to skirt Federal banking laws - which is a very serious matter
No bank fraud. If paying someone money over a period of months instead of one lump sum is not an attempt to skirt anything. How would anyone be able to make a car, home, or any other loan payment? Your on going hate for Trump has completely clouded your sense of logic and reason. Clown, I have alluded to time and again on this forum that I move ten, twenty, thirty...times or more in cash than this $130,000 daily for the company that I work for This would not even cause a blink in a banking environment. Unless there was something else, such as a money transaction by a foreign actor or something that unnaturally appeared to reoccur. My expert opinion says...move along nothing to see here folks.
Cash transactions intentionally structured to be under $10,000 is against the law, it's called 'Structuring'' Structuring transactions to evade the Bank Secrecy Act can result in civil and criminal penalties under the BSA. You sure you're a banker? If so I hope you have lots of help
Do you know how the payment was made? How many installments and at what amounts? No, numnutz, has an "indication" that something may have occurred. Had it occurred, as 70 hopes, then the bank would have reported it on the spot. Not months or years later.
|
|
|
| |
|
70-101
|
May 2 2018, 11:58 PM
Post #14
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,675
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #6
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:46 PM
- Right-Wing
- May 2 2018, 11:36 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:19 PM
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:05 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 10:47 PM
Rudy just threw Trump under the bus, it now appears at the very minimum there may have been bank fraud involved here. Due to Trump paying back Cohen over the course of months instead of just one payment in an attempt to skirt Federal banking laws - which is a very serious matter
No bank fraud. If paying someone money over a period of months instead of one lump sum is not an attempt to skirt anything. How would anyone be able to make a car, home, or any other loan payment? Your on going hate for Trump has completely clouded your sense of logic and reason. Clown, I have alluded to time and again on this forum that I move ten, twenty, thirty...times or more in cash than this $130,000 daily for the company that I work for This would not even cause a blink in a banking environment. Unless there was something else, such as a money transaction by a foreign actor or something that unnaturally appeared to reoccur. My expert opinion says...move along nothing to see here folks.
Cash transactions intentionally structured to be under $10,000 is against the law, it's called 'Structuring'' Structuring transactions to evade the Bank Secrecy Act can result in civil and criminal penalties under the BSA. You sure you're a banker? If so I hope you have lots of help
Do you know how the payment was made? How many installments and at what amounts?
No, numnutz, has an "indication" that something may have occurred. Had it occurred, as 70 hopes, then the bank would have reported it on the spot. Not months or years later. The bank would have reported it on the spot??
The money was laundered through a law firm, it went from Trump to a still unknown law firm then to Cohen, according to Gillani. Do you not see a problem for the Liar in Chief now?
Probably not.
|
|
|
| |
|
70-101
|
May 3 2018, 12:07 AM
Post #15
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,675
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #6
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- Right-Wing
- May 2 2018, 11:36 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:19 PM
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:05 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 10:47 PM
Rudy just threw Trump under the bus, it now appears at the very minimum there may have been bank fraud involved here. Due to Trump paying back Cohen over the course of months instead of just one payment in an attempt to skirt Federal banking laws - which is a very serious matter
No bank fraud. If paying someone money over a period of months instead of one lump sum is not an attempt to skirt anything. How would anyone be able to make a car, home, or any other loan payment? Your on going hate for Trump has completely clouded your sense of logic and reason. Clown, I have alluded to time and again on this forum that I move ten, twenty, thirty...times or more in cash than this $130,000 daily for the company that I work for This would not even cause a blink in a banking environment. Unless there was something else, such as a money transaction by a foreign actor or something that unnaturally appeared to reoccur. My expert opinion says...move along nothing to see here folks.
Cash transactions intentionally structured to be under $10,000 is against the law, it's called 'Structuring'' Structuring transactions to evade the Bank Secrecy Act can result in civil and criminal penalties under the BSA. You sure you're a banker? If so I hope you have lots of help
Do you know how the payment was made? How many installments and at what amounts? No, I don't know. Perhaps Rudy will tell us tomorrow since he claimed earlier this evening on Hannity's show he's still studying the matter. But once Trump's new legal council finds out the whole world will likely know.
|
|
|
| |
|
The Inquisitor
|
May 3 2018, 12:14 AM
Post #16
|
|
- Posts:
- 10,780
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #472
- Joined:
- Feb 25, 2017
|
- 70-101
- May 3 2018, 12:07 AM
- Right-Wing
- May 2 2018, 11:36 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:19 PM
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:05 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 10:47 PM
Rudy just threw Trump under the bus, it now appears at the very minimum there may have been bank fraud involved here. Due to Trump paying back Cohen over the course of months instead of just one payment in an attempt to skirt Federal banking laws - which is a very serious matter
No bank fraud. If paying someone money over a period of months instead of one lump sum is not an attempt to skirt anything. How would anyone be able to make a car, home, or any other loan payment? Your on going hate for Trump has completely clouded your sense of logic and reason. Clown, I have alluded to time and again on this forum that I move ten, twenty, thirty...times or more in cash than this $130,000 daily for the company that I work for This would not even cause a blink in a banking environment. Unless there was something else, such as a money transaction by a foreign actor or something that unnaturally appeared to reoccur. My expert opinion says...move along nothing to see here folks.
Cash transactions intentionally structured to be under $10,000 is against the law, it's called 'Structuring'' Structuring transactions to evade the Bank Secrecy Act can result in civil and criminal penalties under the BSA. You sure you're a banker? If so I hope you have lots of help
Do you know how the payment was made? How many installments and at what amounts?
No, I don't know. Perhaps Rudy will tell us tomorrow since he claimed earlier this evening on Hannity's show he's still studying the matter. But once Trump's new legal council finds out the whole world will likely know. You might be better off sticking with what you do know....It would mean a s**t load less typing for ya.... :oyvey
|
|
Warning....Leftist's Post Here....Take Precautions
|
| |
|
peewee
|
May 3 2018, 12:18 AM
Post #17
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,942
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #218
- Joined:
- May 29, 2016
|
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:58 PM
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:46 PM
- Right-Wing
- May 2 2018, 11:36 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:19 PM
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:05 PM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Cash transactions intentionally structured to be under $10,000 is against the law, it's called 'Structuring'' Structuring transactions to evade the Bank Secrecy Act can result in civil and criminal penalties under the BSA. You sure you're a banker? If so I hope you have lots of help
Do you know how the payment was made? How many installments and at what amounts?
No, numnutz, has an "indication" that something may have occurred. Had it occurred, as 70 hopes, then the bank would have reported it on the spot. Not months or years later.
The bank would have reported it on the spot?? The money was laundered through a law firm, it went from Trump to a still unknown law firm then to Cohen, according to Gillani. Do you not see a problem for the Liar in Chief now? Probably not. You cannot launder money from one entity to another and still be in violation of the BSA. The money has to process through the bank system for the bank to report it. If cash, cash, and there is no indication that any of these payments were in cash then nothing occurred. If there were cash payments made to someone by Trump then who would be at fault is not Trump but rather the entity who received the money and did not report it. No cash transaction no problem. How do you know that Trump paid anyone in cash? And why would he if he could have paid by check which would not be structuring in any way possible.
|
|
|
| |
|
70-101
|
May 3 2018, 03:51 AM
Post #18
|
|
- Posts:
- 6,675
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #6
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- peewee
- May 3 2018, 12:18 AM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:58 PM
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:46 PM
- Right-Wing
- May 2 2018, 11:36 PM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:19 PM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Do you know how the payment was made? How many installments and at what amounts?
No, numnutz, has an "indication" that something may have occurred. Had it occurred, as 70 hopes, then the bank would have reported it on the spot. Not months or years later.
The bank would have reported it on the spot?? The money was laundered through a law firm, it went from Trump to a still unknown law firm then to Cohen, according to Gillani. Do you not see a problem for the Liar in Chief now? Probably not.
You cannot launder money from one entity to another and still be in violation of the BSA. The money has to process through the bank system for the bank to report it. If cash, cash, and there is no indication that any of these payments were in cash then nothing occurred. If there were cash payments made to someone by Trump then who would be at fault is not Trump but rather the entity who received the money and did not report it. No cash transaction no problem. How do you know that Trump paid anyone in cash? And why would he if he could have paid by check which would not be structuring in any way possible. Are you not aware of the SAR the Treasury Dept. has on Michael Cohen? His $130,000 was flagged by the First Republic Bank and the bank reported the suspicious transaction to the Treasury Department. Which will likely go a long way in proving, at a minimum, fraud and campaign finance violations, but Crooked Steven Mnuchin refuses to release the documents - because he's protecting Trump.
It's now likely Michael Avenatti would get copies of the suspicious activity Report until discovery starts, the entire Trump administration is corrupt, and you're just one more very confused administration apologists.
Edited by 70-101, May 3 2018, 04:01 AM.
|
|
|
| |
|
Coast2coast
|
May 3 2018, 04:43 AM
Post #19
|
|
- Posts:
- 16,015
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #19
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
But, but, but, but... President Trump said he didn't know anything about it.
So obviously Mr. Giuliani is lying.
|
|
|
| |
|
Robert Stout
|
May 3 2018, 04:48 AM
Post #20
|
|
- Posts:
- 27,174
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #112
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
|
- 70-101
- May 3 2018, 03:51 AM
- peewee
- May 3 2018, 12:18 AM
- 70-101
- May 2 2018, 11:58 PM
- peewee
- May 2 2018, 11:46 PM
- Right-Wing
- May 2 2018, 11:36 PM
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
No, numnutz, has an "indication" that something may have occurred. Had it occurred, as 70 hopes, then the bank would have reported it on the spot. Not months or years later.
The bank would have reported it on the spot?? The money was laundered through a law firm, it went from Trump to a still unknown law firm then to Cohen, according to Gillani. Do you not see a problem for the Liar in Chief now? Probably not.
You cannot launder money from one entity to another and still be in violation of the BSA. The money has to process through the bank system for the bank to report it. If cash, cash, and there is no indication that any of these payments were in cash then nothing occurred. If there were cash payments made to someone by Trump then who would be at fault is not Trump but rather the entity who received the money and did not report it. No cash transaction no problem. How do you know that Trump paid anyone in cash? And why would he if he could have paid by check which would not be structuring in any way possible.
Are you not aware of the SAR the Treasury Dept. has on Michael Cohen? His $130,000 was flagged by the First Republic Bank and the bank reported the suspicious transaction to the Treasury Department. Which will likely go a long way in proving, at a minimum, fraud and campaign finance violations, but Crooked Steven Mnuchin refuses to release the documents - because he's protecting Trump. It's now likely Michael Avenatti would get copies of the suspicious activity Report until discovery starts, the entire Trump administration is corrupt, and you're just one more very confused administration apologists. I see you continue your hopeless quest for the Holy Grail...There is no light at the end of the tunnel for you............
|
|
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|