Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
FEDS DROP BOMBSHELL: Comey & Lynch Colluded with Clinton Campaign to Entrap, Wiretap Trump; Illegal Scheme Involved Entire U.S. Intel Community
Topic Started: May 20 2018, 10:05 PM (385 Views)
grannyhawkins
Member Avatar
I say that big talk's worth doodly-squat
FEDS DROP BOMBSHELL: Comey & Lynch Colluded with Clinton Campaign to Entrap, Wiretap Trump; Illegal Scheme Involved Entire U.S. Intel Community
https://truepundit.com/feds-drop-bombshell-comey-illegal-scheme-involved-entire-u-s-intel-community/

Posted Image

Loretta Lynch’s Justice Department and James Comey’s FBI worked together with the Hillary Clinton campaign to entrap Donald Trump and associates — including his eldest son — prior to the 2016 presidential election, according to records and testimony of federal law enforcement insiders.

One high ranking official in the Justice Department called it a sweeping “highly illegal” scheme to ensure Hillary Clinton’s election to the White House.

“This was clearly a scheme using Justice (Department) resources and State (Department) resources to get the Russian lawyer into the United States,” one Justice Department insider said. “Who has the power to do this? Only the people at the very top.”

Lynch. Comey. Andrew McCabe. Preet Bhahara. Sally Yates.

And according to high ranking FBI sources, the Bureau played a definitive role in plotting this sweeping privacy breach. But the FBI had much help from the NSA, CIA, the Office of of the Director of National Intelligence, Treasury financial crimes division under DHS, and the Justice Department, federal law enforcement sources confirmed.

John Brennan. James Clapper. Jeh Johnson.

That places the Barack Obama administration directly into this illegal soup, led by Lynch, Yates, Comey and the FBI’s McCabe and associates.
Endeavor to Persevere!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
grannyhawkins
Member Avatar
I say that big talk's worth doodly-squat
Cont.

The Russian lawyer who set up Donald Trump Jr. — Natalia Veselnitskaya — was paid by Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS was paid by Hillary Clinton and the DNC.

Veselnitskaya and Fusion GPS worked together on another caper in 2014, two years before the Trump Jr. operation. In Russia.

Veselnitskaya was barred from entering the United States. Federal law enforcement sources said Lynch and Comey — using Preet Bhahara’s clout in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the southern district of New York — ensured she was granted a special visa for entry, just to set up the Trump inner circle.

A Justice Department official said Clinton likely never expected her campaign’s role and finances to be uncovered and broke a host of federal laws while trying to get elected in 2016, including bringing Veselnitskaya — who was previously barred from entering the United Stated — into Manhattan for the Trump sit down.

Using research firm Fusion GPS as a buffer, Clinton and associates are now linked to financing a scheme to set up the controversial Trump Jr. meeting at Trump Tower before the 2016 presidential election.

Fusion GPS is already on the legal hot seat for commissioning the Dodgy Dossier on Trump, hiring former British spy Christopher Steele to compile the bogus manifesto with the financial backing of the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, as well as the FBI.

But these new revelations — that Fusion GPS played a key role in setting up President Trump’s elder son to make it look like he was colluding with the Russians to beat Hillary — pushes this scandal into a new and more troubling orbit.

Soon after the meeting, Clinton and her campaign flunkies began slamming Trump for his links to Russia and Vladimir Putin, a chorus that continues to this day.

But it appears now this loud chorus was a manufactured arrangement of lies from a paid choir.

Especially since this scheme was backed by Hillary-Clinton dollars which implicates Clinton and her campaign in helping orchestrate the Russian sit down to entrap members of the Trump family.

Perhaps even more alarming, it is now alleged Barack Obama’s Justice Department and FBI helped sneak the Russian lawyer into the United States for the Trump Tower meeting, the insider said. She was previously banned from entering the country (more on that below).
Endeavor to Persevere!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Opinionated
Member Avatar

Oh, what complete and utter BS.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
grannyhawkins
Member Avatar
I say that big talk's worth doodly-squat
Cont.

Federal agents previously disclosed to True Pundit that after the concocted Russian meeting, the British spy agency GCHQ could officially justify wiretapping Trump associates as an intelligence front for NSA because Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya was considered an international security risk and prior to the June sit down was not even allowed entry into the United States or the UK, federal sources said.

Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer who spearheaded the Trump Tower meeting with the Trump campaign trio, was previously barred from entering the United Sates due to her alleged connections to the Russian FSB (the modern replacement of the cold-war-era KGB).

Yet mere days before the June meeting, Veselnitskaya was granted a rare visa to enter the United States from Preet Bharara, the then U.S. Attorney for the southern district of New York. Bharara could not be reached for comment and did not respond the a Twitter inquiry on the Russian’s visa by True Pundit.
Endeavor to Persevere!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Opinionated
Member Avatar

Dude, you need to stop posting more of the article. You're violating the rules on how much can be quoted.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
grannyhawkins
Member Avatar
I say that big talk's worth doodly-squat
Opinionated
May 20 2018, 10:08 PM
Oh, what complete and utter BS.
Wooooooowhooooooooo!!! The wheels is all comin off at the same time!!!

This is gonna be one hail of a train wreck!!!

:nana:
Endeavor to Persevere!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Opinionated
Member Avatar

If what you believe to be true were in fact true, there would have been explosive information released about Trump just prior to the election. Like, for instance, the fact that his campaign was under investigation for collusion with Russia. Which was absolutely true at the time.

The fact that this information wasn't released proves what you believe to be fantasy and nothing more. Anyone willing to go to the trouble of illegally infiltrating a Presidential campaign and illegally monitoring the communications of said campaign, wouldn't have sat on the fact that there was a bona fide FBI investigation of that campaign.

Your logic simply does not hold up to scrutiny.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
grannyhawkins
Member Avatar
I say that big talk's worth doodly-squat
Y'all may have ta graduate from panty liners ta pullups afore this is over!!!

:biggrin:
Endeavor to Persevere!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

Opinionated
May 20 2018, 10:40 PM
If what you believe to be true were in fact true, there would have been explosive information released about Trump just prior to the election. Like, for instance, the fact that his campaign was under investigation for collusion with Russia. Which was absolutely true at the time.

The fact that this information wasn't released proves what you believe to be fantasy and nothing more. Anyone willing to go to the trouble of illegally infiltrating a Presidential campaign and illegally monitoring the communications of said campaign, wouldn't have sat on the fact that there was a bona fide FBI investigation of that campaign.

Your logic simply does not hold up to scrutiny.
Assuming that collusion with russia existed - which it doesn't. :)
MEEK AND MILD
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Inquisitor
Member Avatar

Opinionated
May 20 2018, 10:40 PM
If what you believe to be true were in fact true, there would have been explosive information released about Trump just prior to the election. Like, for instance, the fact that his campaign was under investigation for collusion with Russia. Which was absolutely true at the time.

The fact that this information wasn't released proves what you believe to be fantasy and nothing more. Anyone willing to go to the trouble of illegally infiltrating a Presidential campaign and illegally monitoring the communications of said campaign, wouldn't have sat on the fact that there was a bona fide FBI investigation of that campaign.

Your logic simply does not hold up to scrutiny.
Hillary was assured the win....This was plan B....
Warning....Leftist's Post Here....Take Precautions
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
grannyhawkins
Member Avatar
I say that big talk's worth doodly-squat
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.”

“For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.” ~ Marcus Tullius Cicero
Endeavor to Persevere!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
peewee

Opinionated
May 20 2018, 10:40 PM
If what you believe to be true were in fact true, there would have been explosive information released about Trump just prior to the election. Like, for instance, the fact that his campaign was under investigation for collusion with Russia. Which was absolutely true at the time.

The fact that this information wasn't released proves what you believe to be fantasy and nothing more. Anyone willing to go to the trouble of illegally infiltrating a Presidential campaign and illegally monitoring the communications of said campaign, wouldn't have sat on the fact that there was a bona fide FBI investigation of that campaign.

Your logic simply does not hold up to scrutiny.
You fail to mention that Clinton :drinking: was being investigated for the email server. Slick Willy almost screwed her pooch when he met with Lynch during the investigation. Comey came short of recommending an indictment but rather gave Ma :drinking: a strong lack of judgement reprimand. Only later, just prior to voting day, he came back and reopened the investigation which put just enough doubt into voter's minds to tip the election to Trump.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
BuckFan

This has to be a Rightie version of The Onion.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

BuckFan
May 21 2018, 12:41 AM
This has to be a Rightie version of The Onion.
I think the DNC and Obama using government assets to spy on opposing political campaigns is worth looking into.

I am shocked that someone that is so concerned over due process, such as yourself would ignore actual evidence of potential crimes. :)
Edited by estonianman, May 21 2018, 12:44 AM.
MEEK AND MILD
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Opinionated
Member Avatar

The Inquisitor
May 20 2018, 10:59 PM
Opinionated
May 20 2018, 10:40 PM
If what you believe to be true were in fact true, there would have been explosive information released about Trump just prior to the election. Like, for instance, the fact that his campaign was under investigation for collusion with Russia. Which was absolutely true at the time.

The fact that this information wasn't released proves what you believe to be fantasy and nothing more. Anyone willing to go to the trouble of illegally infiltrating a Presidential campaign and illegally monitoring the communications of said campaign, wouldn't have sat on the fact that there was a bona fide FBI investigation of that campaign.

Your logic simply does not hold up to scrutiny.
Hillary was assured the win....This was plan B....
No one, other than Hillary of course, was absolutely confident she was going to win once Comey made his announcement about reopening his investigation of her because of the emails found on Weiner's laptop.

If there was any time for damning information on Trump to be revealed, that was the time.

Your assertion that this was a "plan B", but they botched it's use, doesn't really hold water.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

Opinionated
May 21 2018, 08:47 AM
The Inquisitor
May 20 2018, 10:59 PM
Opinionated
May 20 2018, 10:40 PM
If what you believe to be true were in fact true, there would have been explosive information released about Trump just prior to the election. Like, for instance, the fact that his campaign was under investigation for collusion with Russia. Which was absolutely true at the time.

The fact that this information wasn't released proves what you believe to be fantasy and nothing more. Anyone willing to go to the trouble of illegally infiltrating a Presidential campaign and illegally monitoring the communications of said campaign, wouldn't have sat on the fact that there was a bona fide FBI investigation of that campaign.

Your logic simply does not hold up to scrutiny.
Hillary was assured the win....This was plan B....
No one, other than Hillary of course, was absolutely confident she was going to win once Comey made his announcement about reopening his investigation of her because of the emails found on Weiner's laptop.

If there was any time for damning information on Trump to be revealed, that was the time.

Your assertion that this was a "plan B", but they botched it's use, doesn't really hold water.
Tick tock :)
MEEK AND MILD
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
clone
Member Avatar
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
estonianman
May 21 2018, 10:25 AM
Opinionated
May 21 2018, 08:47 AM
The Inquisitor
May 20 2018, 10:59 PM
Opinionated
May 20 2018, 10:40 PM
If what you believe to be true were in fact true, there would have been explosive information released about Trump just prior to the election. Like, for instance, the fact that his campaign was under investigation for collusion with Russia. Which was absolutely true at the time.

The fact that this information wasn't released proves what you believe to be fantasy and nothing more. Anyone willing to go to the trouble of illegally infiltrating a Presidential campaign and illegally monitoring the communications of said campaign, wouldn't have sat on the fact that there was a bona fide FBI investigation of that campaign.

Your logic simply does not hold up to scrutiny.
Hillary was assured the win....This was plan B....
No one, other than Hillary of course, was absolutely confident she was going to win once Comey made his announcement about reopening his investigation of her because of the emails found on Weiner's laptop.

If there was any time for damning information on Trump to be revealed, that was the time.

Your assertion that this was a "plan B", but they botched it's use, doesn't really hold water.
Tick tock :)
10 Things we do know....

(well at least those of us who are plugged into these events)


If the present constitutional crisis really involves high federal officials and former federal officials who were colluding with foreign governments, then we have ample evidence that

1) Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation received large sums of money from Russian-related interests in association with ongoing requests to buy into companies that might control North American uranium stocks; that

2) John Kerry has met clandestinely with members and former members of the Iranian government to craft joint strategies to save the so-called Iran Deal, from which the president of the United States just withdrew; and that

3) Hillary Clinton’s campaign hired a foreign national to use sources from other foreign nationals to help subvert the campaign of her 2016 opponent.

4) We do know now that both James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, and John Brennan, head of the CIA, knowingly gave false testimony under oath to Congress.

5) We do know that the deputy director of the FBI is currently under investigation for lying to federal investigators, on at least four occasions, about his own conduct in investigating candidate Hillary Clinton—at a time not long after Clinton-related political action committees gave several hundred thousand dollars to the political campaign of his wife.

6) We do know that the FBI placed some sort of an informant in the camp of Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign in association with gathering information about data used by a foreign national and a paid operative of the Clinton campaign, Christopher Steele, in his effort to collude with Russians against the campaign efforts of Donald Trump.

7) We do know that FBI Director James Comey, in succession, has admitted that he in singular fashion took notes of a confidential one-on-one meeting with the president, briefed him on the existence of a campaign dossier on him, did not disclose that it was purchased by the Clinton campaign, assured him that he was not the subject of a FBI investigation at a time either he or his subordinates were leaking the opposite to the media, and then, after being fired, leaked those memos (at least one of which was classified) to the media to ensure the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the president, who turned out to be a friend of Comey’s, Robert Mueller.

8) Comey by his own admission has also stated that he calibrated the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton to the likelihood of her election to the presidency. FBI directors in a lawful society are not supposed to do such things.

9) We do know that members of the Obama intelligence and national security teams—Susan Rice and Samantha Power among others—requested the names of American citizens surveilled (likely obtained through improperly obtained FISA warrants) to be unmasked. Then someone illegally leaked their names to the press to damage the Trump campaign and his presidential transition.

10) And we do know that U.S. officials, including the head of the FBI and chief deputies in the Justice Department, misled a FISA court to obtain intelligence surveillance on U.S. citizens, by providing information that they knew at the time, but did not disclose to the court, was by their own private admission unverified, compiled by a foreign national whom they had used and fired as an unreliable informant, paid for by the Clinton campaign, and served as the basis for news accounts that were used in circular fashion to verify to the court the dossier’s contents.

LINK
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
grannyhawkins
Member Avatar
I say that big talk's worth doodly-squat
This is not a left or right issue, this is a constitutional crisis, for not only this country and it's citizens, but for the world in general, as we are the only real beacon of freedom, but it's slippin away mighty fast!!!

We need to get to the bottom of all of this in short order!!! People need to start being arrested, left and right!, top to bottom!!!

Politicians and the entire alphabet of government servants, cannot be allowed to manipulate our entire form of government, for their own beliefs and benefits and they're doing it right in front of you!!!

There is ample evidence to bring charges for all the usual suspects and it needs to happen before the next election cycle!!!

Endeavor to Persevere!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Opinionated
Member Avatar

No, it's not a Constitutional issue, because the claims are complete and utter fantasy. Trump didn't lose the election. He won the election. Trump didn't have damaging information released about him weeks before the election, Hillary did. The Republican servers weren't hacked and then the emails released to the public, the Democrats' were. Basically all the crap you think was being plotted to happen to Trump, DID NOT HAPPEN TO TRUMP.

Hell the very fact that his campaign, and maybe he himself, was being investigated for conspiring with the Russians to steal the election might have been enough, all by itself, to have changed the out come. But did that information get leaked to the public, which would have been the easiest thing in the freaking world to have done? NO IT DID NOT.

You guys need to really, REALLY get a grip on reality.
Edited by Opinionated, May 21 2018, 10:08 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Inquisitor
Member Avatar

Opinionated
May 21 2018, 10:08 PM
No, it's not a Constitutional issue, because the claims are complete and utter fantasy. Trump didn't lose the election. He won the election. Trump didn't have damaging information released about him weeks before the election, Hillary did. The Republican servers weren't hacked and then the emails released to the public, the Democrats' were. Basically all the crap you think was being plotted to happen to Trump, DID NOT HAPPEN TO TRUMP.

Hell the very fact that his campaign, and maybe he himself, was being investigated for conspiring with the Russians to steal the election might have been enough, all by itself, to have changed the out come. But did that information get leaked to the public, which would have been the easiest thing in the freaking world to have done? NO IT DID NOT.

You guys need to really, REALLY get a grip on reality.
If the DNC servers were hacked....Why wouldn't they let the FBI look at the servers to confirm it....??

This supposed server hack lacks any plausible credibility.... :rollseyes:

Warning....Leftist's Post Here....Take Precautions
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply