| Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The election of Kings. | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 20 2016, 10:51 PM (469 Views) | |
| Ronin | Apr 20 2016, 10:51 PM Post #1 |
|
http://www.real-time-with-bill-maher-blog.com/index/2016/4/20/youre-not-electing-a-president-youre-electing-a-king When you hear the “Why bother?” complaints from frustrated would-be voters, motivated voters will often point to the Supreme Court and say, “Sure, Congress might be dysfunctional and nothing gets done, but don’t you want your side picking the Supreme Court nominees?” At least that’s what they said back in the day when Congress was functional enough to vote on Supreme Court nominees. But this is exactly wrong. Yes, nothing will get done in Congress as long as the Party of xxxxblock is running it. But that only means that everything that does get done will be done by the President via executive order or new regulation. In the new ballgame, the President is the only player on the field, and the Supreme Court is the manager. And I’m not just talking about foreign policy and starting wars. Congress completely removed themselves from those decisions long ago. Because they’re cowards who only want to support something when it goes right and blast something when it doesn’t. The president is now more like a king and all change flows through him, or possibly her... |
| The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. | |
![]() |
|
| estonianman | Apr 20 2016, 11:08 PM Post #2 |
![]()
|
Will Bill Maher donate another million to the next king? |
| MEEK AND MILD | |
![]() |
|
| Gizmolove | Apr 20 2016, 11:36 PM Post #3 |
|
Gizmolove
|
So true. And, love your signature!
|
| When it comes to lying, cheating, or stealing, consult your DNC or GOP handbook. | |
![]() |
|
| Two a.m. | Apr 20 2016, 11:54 PM Post #4 |
|
Excellent points by Maher. I hope all the "Bernie or Bust" people are listening to him and take heed. |
| "The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them." - George Orwell, 1984 | |
![]() |
|
| Gizmolove | Apr 21 2016, 02:59 AM Post #5 |
|
Gizmolove
|
I'd rather have a king of the people, than the queen of mean. |
| When it comes to lying, cheating, or stealing, consult your DNC or GOP handbook. | |
![]() |
|
| Dr. B | Apr 21 2016, 01:29 PM Post #6 |
|
Member since 2004
|
The Supreme Court is indeed becoming more imperious and oppressive. The death of the only conservative was also highly suspicious. We are daily reminded that we live in a Feudal society, not a democracy. Just the other day, King Obama decided we need to replace white men on our currency because we are all racists. Why wasn't there a vote for what to do with our currency, or at least a town hall? |
| #BringWilmyBack | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Apr 21 2016, 01:33 PM Post #7 |
|
Deleted User
|
Because no one would choose Joseph Smith ... |
|
|
| BuckFan | Apr 21 2016, 01:41 PM Post #8 |
|
I think they ran a quite lengthy comment period (town hall) and there was plenty of citizen comment |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic » |







8:21 PM Jul 10