| Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Yes, Bernie Sanders is not a Democrat — and Hillary represents the very worst of the party | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 21 2016, 02:10 PM (1,646 Views) | |
| Opinionated | Apr 21 2016, 02:10 PM Post #1 |
|
http://www.salon.com/2016/04/20/yes_bernie_sanders_is_not_a_democrat_and_hillary_represents_the_very_worst_of_the_party/ A new strategy has emerged in the Hillary Clinton camp: No longer even try to match Bernie Sanders’ left-wing politics — which the Wall Street-backed multimillionaire war hawk Clinton is fundamentally incapable of doing. Instead, appeal to authority and accuse the democratic socialist of disloyalty to the corrupt Democratic Party. Clinton’s campaign did just that this week, condemning Sanders for “trying to convince the next generation of progressives that the Democratic Party is corrupt.” The notion that Sanders had to try to convince progressives of this in the first place is ludicrous. The warmongering, corporate-funded, pro-privatization Democratic Party leadership has long made it loud and clear that it is thoroughly corrupt and reactionary. |
![]() |
|
| coverpoint | Apr 21 2016, 02:24 PM Post #2 |
|
If Senator Sanders thinks that the Democratic Party is warmongering, corporate-funded, pro-privatization and thoroughly corrupt, then why in the world did he join the Democratic Party a few months ago? He could have ran as an Independent (which he claims himself to be) or a Socialist (which he claims himself to be). Why choose the Democratic Party if it is so terribly corrupt? |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Apr 21 2016, 02:30 PM Post #3 |
|
Deleted User
|
Moved back after consultation with other mods/admins |
|
|
| Harambe4Trump | Apr 21 2016, 02:44 PM Post #4 |
![]()
|
It's good to know the democratic forum is afraid of debate |
|
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary. #MAGA #wallsnotwars | |
![]() |
|
| 70-101 | Apr 21 2016, 02:49 PM Post #5 |
|
Bernies ties to the Democratic party is simply a matter of convenience for him. He used the party to gain national recognition, fame power, and money. When the time comes later this summer he'll simply ignore his financial obligations to help other democratic candidates up for elections. If Bernie Sanders truly wanted to promote his Democratic Socialist ideology he would work to promote a Democratic majority in congress. This would help ensure his ideas and beliefs see the light of day and perhaps become law. But instead, he'll likely just return to the Senate this fall and do little or nothing to promote his ideology except complain about losing the nomination. Bernie could care less about the Democratic party as you will see by his lack of financial support for Democratic candidates. Nor will he barely lift a finger to help Hillary when the times comes. Oh, you'll see him shake some hands and make a keynote speech at the DNC convention, where he talks about the importance party unity. But that's about all the help Democrats will be getting from what's in it for me Bernie. Edited by 70-101, Apr 21 2016, 02:54 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Opinionated | Apr 21 2016, 05:00 PM Post #6 |
|
The article addresses that. And it isn't speaking for Senator Sanders, he's quite capable of speaking for himself. |
![]() |
|
| Opinionated | Apr 21 2016, 05:02 PM Post #7 |
|
On what do you base the statement that he has "financial obligations" to help other democratic candidates? And don't believe that he ran to gain national recognition, fame, power, and money. |
![]() |
|
| Attaburnsinhell | Apr 21 2016, 05:24 PM Post #8 |
|
Probably to turn it into a party the serves the public, not Goldman Sachs or the industrial military complex, or the state of Israel In other words, fighting the corruption that rots the core of it's soul What a novel concept, he must be stopped! |
![]() |
|
| Attaburnsinhell | Apr 21 2016, 05:26 PM Post #9 |
|
Hey Musselini, put this thread back where it originated |
![]() |
|
| coverpoint | Apr 21 2016, 06:12 PM Post #10 |
|
I have read the article and it does not address why Senator Sanders decided a few months ago to join such a "corrupt" political party. |
![]() |
|
| Opinionated | Apr 21 2016, 06:19 PM Post #11 |
|
You seem to be equating what is said in the article to Senator Sanders' personal beliefs. I think we would have to ask Senator Sanders if he believes the Democratic Party to be as corrupt as the article claims, and receive a positive response, before we can reasonably ask him why he would join such a corrupt party. I don't know that I completely agree that the party is as corrupt as the article indicates, but there are some good points made. I thought it was worth posting as a conversation starter if nothing else. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Apr 21 2016, 06:23 PM Post #12 |
|
Deleted User
|
Yes, it does. "Sanders, a longtime independent, is not a party hack. He is a principled leftist who is only running on the Democratic ticket because he knows this, at the present political moment, is the only way he could have a chance of winning. And he is right." |
|
|
| coverpoint | Apr 21 2016, 06:25 PM Post #13 |
|
Well, frankly, I do not know of a single Democrat that asked him to join the Democratic Party a few months ago to save us from the "industrial military complex" that he thinks is rotting us to the core. I mean, thanks Senator Sanders for your attemp at saving us but I think the Party of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schemer, Patty Murray, Barbara Boxer, Michael Bennet, Barbara Mikulski, Elizabeth Warren and your fellow Senator from Vermont Patrick Leahy (who you’re ran against) are doing just fine without your help. Why didn't he re-join the Socialist Party of America and save them from their non-capitalist view of socialism and convert them to "democratic socialists"? Seems like that would have been a more worthwhile undertaking. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Apr 21 2016, 06:28 PM Post #14 |
|
Deleted User
|
Nope. From the article "Sanders, a longtime independent, is not a party hack. He is a principled leftist who is only running on the Democratic ticket because he knows this, at the present political moment, is the only way he could have a chance of winning. And he is right." Purely self-serving. |
|
|
| Attaburnsinhell | Apr 21 2016, 06:36 PM Post #15 |
|
Or how about this, you and those who think like you go join the John Birch Society, seeing that anyone who sticks to FDR style ideals are anti-capitalism commies You'd fit right in |
![]() |
|
| Gizmolove | Apr 21 2016, 06:56 PM Post #16 |
|
Gizmolove
|
And, I only hope you have such radical moderators on your Conservative and Republican Boards behalf; when you guys blast Trump and the GOP, and your posts get moved. (I would think in-house fighting would stay "in house". A lot better than airing our dirty laundry in public). |
| When it comes to lying, cheating, or stealing, consult your DNC or GOP handbook. | |
![]() |
|
| Harambe4Trump | Apr 21 2016, 06:57 PM Post #17 |
![]()
|
Voted4Reagan's post stating that he left the GOP has not been removed . . . |
|
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary. #MAGA #wallsnotwars | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Apr 21 2016, 06:57 PM Post #18 |
|
Deleted User
|
Oh, you mean 'in house' as in a board where anyone can still read the postings? That kind of 'in house'? |
|
|
| Gizmolove | Apr 21 2016, 07:05 PM Post #19 |
|
Gizmolove
|
Oh, so you make the decision on who is a democrat and who is a republican? If Bernie isn't a "democrat", why did the democrats let him run on the democratic ticket??? Seems like every word out of Bernie's mouth would have been championed by the Democratic Party pre-1980. But, times have changed and we aren't really "democrats" any more, are we? How and when the Democratic Party changed and lost it's moral imperative https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5_JV7I0hYE&ebc=ANyPxKoE5gd2Q_dK8u-oC59AvN18Y7m86SMg4ZSWJVcB9vcChor8MRWjgHkFPbjvX_BrXD8pbx3TqpLOk0LU3vjO4l3DOQ4evw |
| When it comes to lying, cheating, or stealing, consult your DNC or GOP handbook. | |
![]() |
|
| Gizmolove | Apr 21 2016, 07:07 PM Post #20 |
|
Gizmolove
|
Well then, you obviously have different moderators than we do. |
| When it comes to lying, cheating, or stealing, consult your DNC or GOP handbook. | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Liberal & Democrat.com/Democratic politics forum · Next Topic » |








8:21 PM Jul 10