Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
How is it that human gender is not settled science but global warming is?
Topic Started: Apr 26 2016, 07:30 PM (982 Views)
Drudge X
Member Avatar

Can a leftists explain this?

If you are born a male or female, your DNA within your chromosomes is proof. Plus, have you ever seen a male experiencing menstrual cycle or suffering from hot flash?

Global warming is the prediction of the temperature for the next 100 years within one one-thousandth degree is proof.

It's sad that leftists will do anything to push their agenda.
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
CautionaryTales
Member Avatar

^^^^^^Pushing his agenda^^^^^^^


Have you paid your internet taxes?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

Why are you rejecting science?
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
clone
Member Avatar
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
Liberal hypocrisy knows no bounds....none
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

Curt Schilling said something several weeks ago. Leftist ESPN ended ties with him for telling the truth. Til this day, not one leftist was able challenge what he said.
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

Drudge X
Apr 26 2016, 10:13 PM
Curt Schilling said this several weeks ago. Leftist ESPN ended ties with him for telling the truth. Til this day, not one leftist was able challenge what he said.
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robert Stout
Member Avatar

Drudge X
Apr 26 2016, 10:13 PM
Curt Schilling said something several weeks ago. Leftist ESPN ended ties with him for telling the truth. Til this day, not one leftist was able challenge what he said.
Hot flashes prove the existence of global warming...However, it is not man caused, but may be postponed by a guy.......... :dunno:
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
clone
Member Avatar
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
Hillary's coughing is the new wind power....
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lucash
Member Avatar
#NeverTrump
Drudge X
Apr 26 2016, 07:30 PM
Can a leftists explain this?

If you are born a male or female, your DNA within your chromosomes is proof. Plus, have you ever seen a male experiencing menstrual cycle or suffering from hot flash?

Global warming is the prediction of the temperature for the next 100 years within one one-thousandth degree is proof.

It's sad that leftists will do anything to push their agenda.
Ahem.

https://www.bodylogicmd.com/for-men/hot-flashes

http://www.popsci.com/do-men-have-hormonal-cycles

So yes, it does appear that men have similar hormonal cycles (but not the same as necessarily).

Anyways, I'll let you wallow in your bigotry there mate.
"...a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is detrimental...having lost the will..to demand...good..." - Rachel Carson
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

lucash
Apr 27 2016, 12:52 AM
Drudge X
Apr 26 2016, 07:30 PM
Can a leftists explain this?

If you are born a male or female, your DNA within your chromosomes is proof. Plus, have you ever seen a male experiencing menstrual cycle or suffering from hot flash?

Global warming is the prediction of the temperature for the next 100 years within one one-thousandth degree is proof.

It's sad that leftists will do anything to push their agenda.
Ahem.

https://www.bodylogicmd.com/for-men/hot-flashes

http://www.popsci.com/do-men-have-hormonal-cycles

So yes, it does appear that men have similar hormonal cycles (but not the same as necessarily).

Anyways, I'll let you wallow in your bigotry there mate.
Male hot flash having to do with menstrual cycle?

I hope that isn't proven science, yet.

It's a valid question to ask, no?

If you are born male, you are male.
If you are born female, you are female.

This is the problem with leftism. Accept their terms and you are a saint to them. Challenge their beliefs and you are [insert just about every derogatory adjectives you can come up with].

Edited by Drudge X, Apr 27 2016, 01:14 AM.
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lucash
Member Avatar
#NeverTrump
Drudge X
Apr 27 2016, 01:13 AM
lucash
Apr 27 2016, 12:52 AM
Drudge X
Apr 26 2016, 07:30 PM
Can a leftists explain this?

If you are born a male or female, your DNA within your chromosomes is proof. Plus, have you ever seen a male experiencing menstrual cycle or suffering from hot flash?

Global warming is the prediction of the temperature for the next 100 years within one one-thousandth degree is proof.

It's sad that leftists will do anything to push their agenda.
Ahem.

https://www.bodylogicmd.com/for-men/hot-flashes

http://www.popsci.com/do-men-have-hormonal-cycles

So yes, it does appear that men have similar hormonal cycles (but not the same as necessarily).

Anyways, I'll let you wallow in your bigotry there mate.
Male hot flash having to do with menstrual cycle?

I hope that isn't proven science, yet.

It's a valid question to ask, no?

If you are born male, you are male.
If you are born female, you are female.

This is the problem with leftism. Accept their terms and you are a saint to them. Challenge their beliefs and you are [insert just about every derogatory adjectives you can come up with].

Are you that slow there D? I'm saying men have hormonal cycles similar to women, and can experience similar 'hot flash' like moments. Obviously they're not identical because you're dealing some differences, but yes, there is as science and medicine has shown similar events.

Why do you hope that? Because you don't want to believe it? Well, fine, ignore science and medicine, just don't expect to go far there mate. If you don't want to realize the truth that *male* and *female* are largely social and cultural constructs then so be it, but science is continuously discovering that there is way more to gender, gender identity, and so on that your - ahem - "traditional" mindset would have us believe.

I respect your right to believe whatever nonsense you want of course, but maybe...just maybe, it's time to move into the 21st century. And it has nothing to what *I* think, I'm simply going with science. You know, logic. But again, your life and your views.

:cheers:
"...a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is detrimental...having lost the will..to demand...good..." - Rachel Carson
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Harambe4Trump
Member Avatar

That isn't what genetics or biology says at all. Superficial sociology professors may say that, not geneticists.
Edited by Harambe4Trump, Apr 27 2016, 01:25 AM.
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary.
#MAGA
#wallsnotwars
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

Ok, but until science can prove what you said, you agree that if a person born male, with DNA as proof, that person is a male. The same goes for female, correct?

Now how about this settled science about global warming prediction 100 years into the future?
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

American Identitarian
Apr 27 2016, 01:24 AM
That isn't what genetics or biology says at all. Superficial sociology professors may say that, not geneticists.
I am sure those are the same people calling themselves multiculturalists.
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lucash
Member Avatar
#NeverTrump
Drudge X
Apr 27 2016, 01:27 AM
Ok, but until science can prove what you said, you agree that if a person born male, with DNA as proof, that person is a male. The same goes for female, correct?

Now how about this settled science about global warming prediction 100 years into the future?
Science HAS been proving it, or more so the evidence out there constantly reinforces what I stated. The problem isn't that science has or has not "proven" (misnomer) it, it's that you and others simply do not want to learn and/or accept the evidence out there. That said, yes, I will happily admit that there's still work to be done and things to study, but, if I'm willingly conceding that science is still learning about this topic, then I'd hope you would be willing to actually acknowledge that science has evidence to support what I said. As opposed to, say, burying your head in the sand.

No, I don't agree with it. For me - from what I've studied, read, etc. - gender, gender identity, and so on is an area that is, even if you don't take into account the evidence science offers, an already complex thing. Traditionalism once said that to "be a man" meant you had to be, bluntly put, some macho jack ass. I don't agree with that - that's a social construct, not biological or genetic or scientific evidence. So, I think that 'being male' is a composite, or mix of various factors. The factors being social, biological, genetic, and so on.
"...a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is detrimental...having lost the will..to demand...good..." - Rachel Carson
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Harambe4Trump
Member Avatar

lucash
Apr 27 2016, 01:46 AM
Drudge X
Apr 27 2016, 01:27 AM
Ok, but until science can prove what you said, you agree that if a person born male, with DNA as proof, that person is a male. The same goes for female, correct?

Now how about this settled science about global warming prediction 100 years into the future?
Science HAS been proving it, or more so the evidence out there constantly reinforces what I stated. The problem isn't that science has or has not "proven" (misnomer) it, it's that you and others simply do not want to learn and/or accept the evidence out there. That said, yes, I will happily admit that there's still work to be done and things to study, but, if I'm willingly conceding that science is still learning about this topic, then I'd hope you would be willing to actually acknowledge that science has evidence to support what I said. As opposed to, say, burying your head in the sand.

No, I don't agree with it. For me - from what I've studied, read, etc. - gender, gender identity, and so on is an area that is, even if you don't take into account the evidence science offers, an already complex thing. Traditionalism once said that to "be a man" meant you had to be, bluntly put, some macho jack ass. I don't agree with that - that's a social construct, not biological or genetic or scientific evidence. So, I think that 'being male' is a composite, or mix of various factors. The factors being social, biological, genetic, and so on.
The genetics or more definite, the chemistry of sex is sharp and clear.
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary.
#MAGA
#wallsnotwars
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
estonianman
Member Avatar

Hit her in the weak spot mac!
Edited by estonianman, Apr 27 2016, 01:50 AM.
MEEK AND MILD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lucash
Member Avatar
#NeverTrump
American Identitarian
Apr 27 2016, 01:48 AM
lucash
Apr 27 2016, 01:46 AM
Drudge X
Apr 27 2016, 01:27 AM
Ok, but until science can prove what you said, you agree that if a person born male, with DNA as proof, that person is a male. The same goes for female, correct?

Now how about this settled science about global warming prediction 100 years into the future?
Science HAS been proving it, or more so the evidence out there constantly reinforces what I stated. The problem isn't that science has or has not "proven" (misnomer) it, it's that you and others simply do not want to learn and/or accept the evidence out there. That said, yes, I will happily admit that there's still work to be done and things to study, but, if I'm willingly conceding that science is still learning about this topic, then I'd hope you would be willing to actually acknowledge that science has evidence to support what I said. As opposed to, say, burying your head in the sand.

No, I don't agree with it. For me - from what I've studied, read, etc. - gender, gender identity, and so on is an area that is, even if you don't take into account the evidence science offers, an already complex thing. Traditionalism once said that to "be a man" meant you had to be, bluntly put, some macho jack ass. I don't agree with that - that's a social construct, not biological or genetic or scientific evidence. So, I think that 'being male' is a composite, or mix of various factors. The factors being social, biological, genetic, and so on.
The genetics or more definite, the chemistry of sex is sharp and clear.
What are you referring to specifically?

Again, I've not denied that certain aspects of the over arching topic of gender (etc) don't already have substantial research and support backing them and are likely at the moment more or less accepted, in that specific field/aspect, but again, science continues to show there's just simply more to gender, etc.

"...a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is detrimental...having lost the will..to demand...good..." - Rachel Carson
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Harambe4Trump
Member Avatar

No. Genetics does not teach that.
Skipping leg day is the equivalent of a woman having an abortion. You're ashamed of it, and it was probably unnecessary.
#MAGA
#wallsnotwars
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

lucash
Apr 27 2016, 01:46 AM
Drudge X
Apr 27 2016, 01:27 AM
Ok, but until science can prove what you said, you agree that if a person born male, with DNA as proof, that person is a male. The same goes for female, correct?

Now how about this settled science about global warming prediction 100 years into the future?
Science HAS been proving it, or more so the evidence out there constantly reinforces what I stated. The problem isn't that science has or has not "proven" (misnomer) it, it's that you and others simply do not want to learn and/or accept the evidence out there. That said, yes, I will happily admit that there's still work to be done and things to study, but, if I'm willingly conceding that science is still learning about this topic, then I'd hope you would be willing to actually acknowledge that science has evidence to support what I said. As opposed to, say, burying your head in the sand.

No, I don't agree with it. For me - from what I've studied, read, etc. - gender, gender identity, and so on is an area that is, even if you don't take into account the evidence science offers, an already complex thing. Traditionalism once said that to "be a man" meant you had to be, bluntly put, some macho jack ass. I don't agree with that - that's a social construct, not biological or genetic or scientific evidence. So, I think that 'being male' is a composite, or mix of various factors. The factors being social, biological, genetic, and so on.
What??? :lol:

Who said anything if you are a male, you gotta put up this macho or He-Man or Skeletor like attitude? I mean, I don't weep like females. The social construct has proven what it meant to be a male since the dawn of humanity. Those cave drawings by Neanderthal people depicting male as the hunters then and into this modern era has nothing to do with genetics and evolution but just this accepted social construct?

Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
Learn More · Register Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply