Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
How is it that human gender is not settled science but global warming is?
Topic Started: Apr 26 2016, 07:30 PM (983 Views)
Coast2coast

Human gender obviously involves for some the psychological and climate change is pure physical science.

One has nothing to do with the other besides that which the deniers of both wish to tie together for their odd form of politics.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Drudge X
Apr 26 2016, 08:32 PM
Why are you rejecting science?
Oh, I get it. You meant this to be a joke.

:-/
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Clearly the time has come to ignore climate change deniers.

This topic demonstrates how silly and desperate they have become over the subject.

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

Coast2coast
Apr 27 2016, 02:00 AM
Human gender obviously involves for some the psychological and climate change is pure physical science.

One has nothing to do with the other besides that which the deniers of both wish to tie together for their odd form of politics.
Sorry comrade, you just can't go on selectively accepting the arguments you find convenient as settled science.

How is the prediction of the global temperature rising one one-hundredth or one one-thousandth of a degree 100 years from now considered settled science?
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Drudge X
Apr 27 2016, 02:07 AM
Coast2coast
Apr 27 2016, 02:00 AM
Human gender obviously involves for some the psychological and climate change is pure physical science.

One has nothing to do with the other besides that which the deniers of both wish to tie together for their odd form of politics.
Sorry comrade, you just can't go on selectively accepting the arguments you find convenient as settled science.

How is the prediction of the global temperature rising one one-hundredth or one one-thousandth of a degree 100 years from now considered settled science?
:rollseyes:

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lucash
Member Avatar
#NeverTrump
Drudge X
Apr 27 2016, 02:00 AM
lucash
Apr 27 2016, 01:46 AM
Drudge X
Apr 27 2016, 01:27 AM
Ok, but until science can prove what you said, you agree that if a person born male, with DNA as proof, that person is a male. The same goes for female, correct?

Now how about this settled science about global warming prediction 100 years into the future?
Science HAS been proving it, or more so the evidence out there constantly reinforces what I stated. The problem isn't that science has or has not "proven" (misnomer) it, it's that you and others simply do not want to learn and/or accept the evidence out there. That said, yes, I will happily admit that there's still work to be done and things to study, but, if I'm willingly conceding that science is still learning about this topic, then I'd hope you would be willing to actually acknowledge that science has evidence to support what I said. As opposed to, say, burying your head in the sand.

No, I don't agree with it. For me - from what I've studied, read, etc. - gender, gender identity, and so on is an area that is, even if you don't take into account the evidence science offers, an already complex thing. Traditionalism once said that to "be a man" meant you had to be, bluntly put, some macho jack ass. I don't agree with that - that's a social construct, not biological or genetic or scientific evidence. So, I think that 'being male' is a composite, or mix of various factors. The factors being social, biological, genetic, and so on.
What??? :lol:

Who said anything if you are a male, you gotta put up this macho or He-Man or Skeletor like attitude? I mean, I don't weep like females. The social construct has proven what it meant to be a male since the dawn of humanity. Those cave drawings by Neanderthal people depicting male as the hunters then and into this modern era has nothing to do with genetics and evolution but just this accepted social construct?

Maybe it wasn't something that was prevalent in your generation but christ, it was with mine. The whole 'machismo' nonsense was eye rolling. Meh.

What has it proven though? That certain groups had men in specific, possibly domineering/in charge, roles? Great, you can claim cave drawings without context, but off the top of my head I can raise you the Chambri people who are a matriarchy and as far as I've read, always have been. So what has your cave drawings "proven"? That some cultures evolved that way? That doesn't mean that men and women *must* fit those roles, identities, etc. It just means that in those cultures, that's how it panned out.

Just because something is traditional, or 'has been around' a while doesn't mean it is accurate. Slavery and the view point of certain groups being inferior has existed in some form or another for millennia, but that doesn't make either right morally or scientifically.

In the end, all this verbiage aside...my view is this: Everyone is different so be kind; The science is there, so accept it, and lets keep learning.
"...a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is detrimental...having lost the will..to demand...good..." - Rachel Carson
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robert Stout
Member Avatar

Man caused global warming is as scientifically proven as man caused orgasm in women................ :rollseyes:
Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Robert Stout
Apr 27 2016, 06:02 AM
Man caused global warming is as scientifically proven as man caused orgasm in women................ :rollseyes:
And we have confirmation of global warming.

:hooray:


Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ringotuna
Member Avatar

Robert Stout
Apr 27 2016, 06:02 AM
Man caused global warming is as scientifically proven as man caused orgasm in women................ :rollseyes:
:rotflmao:
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ringotuna
Member Avatar

Coast2coast
Apr 27 2016, 06:39 AM
Robert Stout
Apr 27 2016, 06:02 AM
Man caused global warming is as scientifically proven as man caused orgasm in women................ :rollseyes:
And we have confirmation of global warming.

:hooray:


Don't be so sure there buddy. :biggrin:

Posted Image
Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply