| Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Hillary Clinton is going to be exonerated on the email controversy. It won’t matter. | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 6 2016, 09:13 PM (301 Views) | |
| Deleted User | May 6 2016, 09:13 PM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
The latest news on the Hillary Clinton email controversy reinforces everything we’ve heard so far on this subject: Prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server have so far found scant evidence that the leading Democratic presidential candidate intended to break classification rules, though they are still probing the case aggressively with an eye on interviewing Clinton herself, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter. FBI agents on the case have been joined by federal prosecutors from the same office that successfully prosecuted 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui — and who would handle any Edward Snowden case, should he ever return to the country, according to the U.S. officials familiar with the matter. And in recent weeks, prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia and their FBI counterparts have been interviewing top Clinton aides as they seek to bring the case to a close. That point about her intending to break classification rules is important, because in order to have broken the law, it isn’t enough for Clinton to have had classified information in a place where it was possible for it to be hacked. She would have had to intentionally given classified information to someone without authorization to have it, like David Petraeus did when he showed classified documents to his mistress (and then lied to the FBI about it, by the way). Despite the enormous manpower and time the Justice Department has devoted to this case, there has never been even a suggestion, let alone any evidence, that Clinton did any such thing. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/05/06/hillary-clinton-is-going-to-be-exonerated-on-the-email-controversy-it-wont-matter/ |
|
|
| Drudge X | May 6 2016, 09:41 PM Post #2 |
|
Why do leftists support a known criminal? |
| Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind. | |
![]() |
|
| nNeo | May 6 2016, 10:04 PM Post #3 |
|
Excellent question. Perhaps you can tell us? http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/06/news/donald-trump-university-trial/ |
| “Strong people don’t need strong leaders.” | |
![]() |
|
| Robert Stout | May 6 2016, 10:19 PM Post #4 |
|
Democrats are confident that Hillary will continue to beat the charges....She is their Teflon Donna...............
|
| Jesus can raise the dead, but he can't fix stupid | |
![]() |
|
| Coast2coast | May 7 2016, 01:08 AM Post #5 |
|
When this fails conservatives will just organize a new hunt. It's who they are, it's the best they can do. |
![]() |
|
| Mr. Tik | May 7 2016, 01:25 AM Post #6 |
![]()
|
back to the ol' drawing board |
|
You may be a conservative republican..if you are pro life until you get your mistress knocked up | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic » |








4:07 AM Jul 11