Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Why did Clinton take money from the fradulent company Theranos?
Topic Started: Jun 2 2016, 01:21 AM (81 Views)
Drudge X
Member Avatar

As some of you may know by now, Theranos is under federal investigation for their miraculous blood testing claim. The results so far are not good for the company. This young CEO, many leftists believed she is the next Steve Jobs, is being target by federal investigators. The entire board of director at the company has almost no medical personnel but composed of politicians and military personnel with zero medical knowledge whatsoever in the medical fields. Walgreens is having a headache right now. I doubt Theranos can provide any credible proof that their testing methods are far more accurate than tradition methods. If not, Walgreens will get hit with a class action lawsuit. Worst of all, she said back then that having a back-up plan means you failed. Guess she is not having the last laugh.

So why is Clinton so eager to take money from a fraudulent company in the first place when medical experts around the world are questioning Theranos over the top claim?

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/18/hillary-fundraiser-will-not-be-held-at-theranos-hq.html
Edited by Drudge X, Jun 2 2016, 01:28 AM.
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply