Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
San Francisco leftists want to ban the Blue Angels; but welcome illegal immigrant criminals with open arms
Topic Started: Jun 7 2016, 02:05 PM (390 Views)
Drudge X
Member Avatar

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/06/06/a-san-francisco-lawmaker-has-had-enough-of-the-blue-angels-strafing-his-city/
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Your topic title is dishonest. He does not want to ban the Blue Angels.

I used to love watching the Blue Angels flying over the city and I never felt unsafe.

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

Coast2coast
Jun 7 2016, 02:26 PM
Your topic title is dishonest. He does not want to ban the Blue Angels.

I used to love watching the Blue Angels flying over the city and I never felt unsafe.

Not allowing them to fly over the city is a ban. In a city with 800,000 people, how many people you think the waterfront by Golden Gate bridge can hold?
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Drudge X
Jun 7 2016, 02:05 PM
No need to ban them. Simply defund them.
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

Drudge X
Jun 7 2016, 02:29 PM
Coast2coast
Jun 7 2016, 02:26 PM
Your topic title is dishonest. He does not want to ban the Blue Angels.

I used to love watching the Blue Angels flying over the city and I never felt unsafe.

Not allowing them to fly over the city is a ban. In a city with 800,000 people, how many people you think the waterfront by Golden Gate bridge can hold?
You don't watch a Blue Angel performance from the city streets.

Again, your title is dishonest.


Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Member013

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply