| Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Clinton wore a $12,500 jacket while giving a speech about inequality | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 8 2016, 10:41 AM (1,181 Views) | |
| Opinionated | Jun 9 2016, 08:09 AM Post #21 |
|
It's probably coming out of her own pocket, and she has probably spent about as much on it as she received giving a single "speech" to Goldman Sach's... http://nypost.com/2016/06/05/hillarys-extravagant-campaign-wardrobe-costs-at-least-200k/ |
![]() |
|
| BuckFan | Jun 9 2016, 08:29 AM Post #22 |
|
Hillary Clinton started income inequality? Really? I suspect Marx who lived a hundred years earlier than she would find that an interesting concept. |
![]() |
|
| clone | Jun 9 2016, 09:15 AM Post #23 |
|
Director @ Center for Advanced Memetic Warfare
|
You Hillary sycophants really have to twist yourself into pretzels to make excuses for her....it's embarrassing....or should be.... |
|
Only liberals can choose not to go down the road to widespread, systematic violence. | |
![]() |
|
| Drudge X | Jun 9 2016, 11:03 AM Post #24 |
|
Using that logic, we should get rid of government agencies right? When was the last time heads of government agencies do anything like take part in what they oversee? |
| Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind. | |
![]() |
|
| ringotuna | Jun 9 2016, 11:27 AM Post #25 |
|
A meme turned up on my FB page showing a picture of Hillary in her coat next to a picture of a vacuum cleaner bag.. Could hardly tell the difference. The reason I ask is because it seems quite irresponsible, even for a wealthy woman to spend that much on a coat. |
| Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated. | |
![]() |
|
| Opinionated | Jun 9 2016, 01:17 PM Post #26 |
|
It's a lot of money, certainly. But you can easily spend that much on a good bespoke men's suit. I have to say, however, that I'm not keen on the idea of those who are supposed to represent people like me on the topic of income inequality spending more on a single piece of clothing than I spent on my entire wardrobe. |
![]() |
|
| Dem4life | Jun 9 2016, 01:28 PM Post #27 |
|
Like you did with The Donald
|
![]() |
|
| lucash | Jun 9 2016, 03:34 PM Post #28 |
|
#NeverTrump
|
Yup, woman of the people, understands those who work hard but struggle. |
| "...a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is detrimental...having lost the will..to demand...good..." - Rachel Carson | |
![]() |
|
| ringotuna | Jun 9 2016, 06:37 PM Post #29 |
|
http://www.menswearhouse.com/mens-suits/buy-1-get-1-free-suits-sport-coats-and-outerwear?cm_sp=2016_06_09-_-HP_HERO-_-BOGOFREESUITS |
| Ringoism: Never underestimate the advantages of being underestimated. | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






8:47 PM Jul 10