Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Muslim Killer Already Acquitted By Obama - Lib Media.
Topic Started: Jun 16 2016, 11:32 AM (398 Views)
philly rabbit

And who is Obama and his loyal followers blaming for the Orlando slaughter instead?

1. Donald Trump

2. American gun owners

3. The National Rifle Association.

We must end political correctness once and for all in this country and we must as a priority defeat these people no matter whatever it takes.
Proud Deplorable.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Ok, how does calling a man an Islamic terrorist when an ongoing investigation is indicating that that may not have been his sole motivation going to assist us in defeating "these people", first you'd have to define "these people"

And your words "No matter what it takes" is somewhat chilling to me, not sure what level you're willing to stoop to ?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

So, are you outrage with this move by the Obama administration? Punishing people without an investigation?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/punishment-without-evidence-on-campus-1465253334
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Drudge X
Jun 16 2016, 11:41 AM
So, are you outrage with this move by the Obama administration? Punishing people without an investigation?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/punishment-without-evidence-on-campus-1465253334
I'm not going to subscribe to the read the story, but the Obama Administration has no connection to anything do to with punishment on campuses....once again, you embarass me.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Drudge X
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jun 16 2016, 12:23 PM
Drudge X
Jun 16 2016, 11:41 AM
So, are you outrage with this move by the Obama administration? Punishing people without an investigation?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/punishment-without-evidence-on-campus-1465253334
I'm not going to subscribe to the read the story, but the Obama Administration has no connection to anything do to with punishment on campuses....once again, you embarass me.
Allow me. It has everything to do with his administration.

Here are the first few paragraphs but you see where this is going.


This academic year will be remembered for its psychological crack-ups over Halloween costumes (Yale), faculty intimidation of student journalists covering protesters (the University of Missouri) and purges of single-sex social clubs (Harvard). But the dishonor roll isn’t complete without documenting how the Obama Administration is further eroding due process on campus.

The Education and Justice Departments have already gone far to subvert the norm that students accused of sexual assault retain individual rights. Now they are targeting the few rights that are left. Under new standards promulgated this spring, students can be punished before any disciplinary hearing has been held, and sometimes after anonymous allegations.

Starting with a 2011 “Dear Colleague” letter, the Education Department has reinterpreted the Title IX law that prohibits sex discrimination at educational institutions, creating legal obligations that do not exist in federal statutes. Schools can now lose taxpayer funds if they use a “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard for adjudicating assaults instead of the less rigorous “preponderance of the evidence.”
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Drudge X
Jun 16 2016, 12:58 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 16 2016, 12:23 PM
Drudge X
Jun 16 2016, 11:41 AM
So, are you outrage with this move by the Obama administration? Punishing people without an investigation?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/punishment-without-evidence-on-campus-1465253334
I'm not going to subscribe to the read the story, but the Obama Administration has no connection to anything do to with punishment on campuses....once again, you embarass me.
Allow me. It has everything to do with his administration.

Here are the first few paragraphs but you see where this is going.


This academic year will be remembered for its psychological crack-ups over Halloween costumes (Yale), faculty intimidation of student journalists covering protesters (the University of Missouri) and purges of single-sex social clubs (Harvard). But the dishonor roll isn’t complete without documenting how the Obama Administration is further eroding due process on campus.

The Education and Justice Departments have already gone far to subvert the norm that students accused of sexual assault retain individual rights. Now they are targeting the few rights that are left. Under new standards promulgated this spring, students can be punished before any disciplinary hearing has been held, and sometimes after anonymous allegations.

Starting with a 2011 “Dear Colleague” letter, the Education Department has reinterpreted the Title IX law that prohibits sex discrimination at educational institutions, creating legal obligations that do not exist in federal statutes. Schools can now lose taxpayer funds if they use a “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard for adjudicating assaults instead of the less rigorous “preponderance of the evidence.”
"Schools can now lose taxpayer funds if they use a “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard for adjudicating assaults instead of the less rigorous “preponderance of the evidence.”"

:banghead:
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Drudge X
Jun 16 2016, 12:58 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 16 2016, 12:23 PM
Drudge X
Jun 16 2016, 11:41 AM
So, are you outrage with this move by the Obama administration? Punishing people without an investigation?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/punishment-without-evidence-on-campus-1465253334
I'm not going to subscribe to the read the story, but the Obama Administration has no connection to anything do to with punishment on campuses....once again, you embarass me.
Allow me. It has everything to do with his administration.

Here are the first few paragraphs but you see where this is going.


This academic year will be remembered for its psychological crack-ups over Halloween costumes (Yale), faculty intimidation of student journalists covering protesters (the University of Missouri) and purges of single-sex social clubs (Harvard). But the dishonor roll isn’t complete without documenting how the Obama Administration is further eroding due process on campus.

The Education and Justice Departments have already gone far to subvert the norm that students accused of sexual assault retain individual rights. Now they are targeting the few rights that are left. Under new standards promulgated this spring, students can be punished before any disciplinary hearing has been held, and sometimes after anonymous allegations.

Starting with a 2011 “Dear Colleague” letter, the Education Department has reinterpreted the Title IX law that prohibits sex discrimination at educational institutions, creating legal obligations that do not exist in federal statutes. Schools can now lose taxpayer funds if they use a “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard for adjudicating assaults instead of the less rigorous “preponderance of the evidence.”
Again, it has nothing to do with the Administration, the Executive Branch is not entitled in the manner in which you suggest in your rants. Schools are not law-enforcement agencies of the Department of Education, but neither are they to look the other way at sexual assault which is rampant on US campuses. Find another Topic Drudge, if you're going to go after Obama for any of your fantasies, this wouldn't be the area.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Robertr2000
Jun 16 2016, 01:20 PM
Drudge X
Jun 16 2016, 12:58 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 16 2016, 12:23 PM
Allow me. It has everything to do with his administration.

Here are the first few paragraphs but you see where this is going.


This academic year will be remembered for its psychological crack-ups over Halloween costumes (Yale), faculty intimidation of student journalists covering protesters (the University of Missouri) and purges of single-sex social clubs (Harvard). But the dishonor roll isn’t complete without documenting how the Obama Administration is further eroding due process on campus.

The Education and Justice Departments have already gone far to subvert the norm that students accused of sexual assault retain individual rights. Now they are targeting the few rights that are left. Under new standards promulgated this spring, students can be punished before any disciplinary hearing has been held, and sometimes after anonymous allegations.

Starting with a 2011 “Dear Colleague” letter, the Education Department has reinterpreted the Title IX law that prohibits sex discrimination at educational institutions, creating legal obligations that do not exist in federal statutes. Schools can now lose taxpayer funds if they use a “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard for adjudicating assaults instead of the less rigorous “preponderance of the evidence.”
"Schools can now lose taxpayer funds if they use a “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard for adjudicating assaults instead of the less rigorous “preponderance of the evidence.”"

:banghead:
Their job is to an initial investigation, and then turn over to the proper legal authorities. It is not up to them to investigate. It's their duty to report.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
philly rabbit

Tsalagi
Jun 16 2016, 11:35 AM
Ok, how does calling a man an Islamic terrorist when an ongoing investigation is indicating that that may not have been his sole motivation going to assist us in defeating "these people", first you'd have to define "these people"

And your words "No matter what it takes" is somewhat chilling to me, not sure what level you're willing to stoop to ?
I'm a gun owner tsal dude and any second now, I'm going to shoot up the neighborhood.

I'm white ..male .. and dangerous.

I also belong to the National Rifle Association .. the VFW .. AND the American Legion.
Proud Deplorable.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

philly rabbit
Jun 16 2016, 03:18 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 16 2016, 11:35 AM
Ok, how does calling a man an Islamic terrorist when an ongoing investigation is indicating that that may not have been his sole motivation going to assist us in defeating "these people", first you'd have to define "these people"

And your words "No matter what it takes" is somewhat chilling to me, not sure what level you're willing to stoop to ?
I'm a gun owner tsal dude and any second now, I'm going to shoot up the neighborhood.

I'm white ..male .. and dangerous.

I also belong to the National Rifle Association .. the VFW .. AND the American Legion.
Maybe I should have my Post Commander gives yours a call just to make sure you're ok?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
edro14

testing one, two three, let the truth serum take hold...breath in breath out.

Okay boys, the NRA sanctions gun safety, but not one of youse has ever taken any training on gun safety.

The vast majority of gun owners in the USA are psychos who should be registered as unfit to even vote much less own a gun.

And what gives with Americans who side Trump and everything he says when we all know he is nothing but a loud mouth blow hard doing everything he can to alienate Americans against each other.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Member013

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Coast2coast

philly rabbit
Jun 16 2016, 03:18 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 16 2016, 11:35 AM
Ok, how does calling a man an Islamic terrorist when an ongoing investigation is indicating that that may not have been his sole motivation going to assist us in defeating "these people", first you'd have to define "these people"

And your words "No matter what it takes" is somewhat chilling to me, not sure what level you're willing to stoop to ?
I'm a gun owner tsal dude and any second now, I'm going to shoot up the neighborhood.

I'm white ..male .. and dangerous.

I also belong to the National Rifle Association .. the VFW .. AND the American Legion.
Hear something, say something.

Sounds like you are threatening your neighborhood.

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Op EDITORIALS: personal & political governance · Next Topic »
Add Reply