Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Growing support for Muslim ban, even among Democrats and liberals
Topic Started: Jun 17 2016, 05:41 PM (2,019 Views)
philly rabbit

Tsalagi
Jun 19 2016, 03:30 PM
philly rabbit
Jun 19 2016, 02:49 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 19 2016, 12:44 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deephttp://akinokure.blogspot.com
Yes he can. For the purpose of national security and to protect the American people.
Please provide for me the pertinent Constitutional Authority to disregard the 1st Amendment to the Constitution, or revelant National Security Act of 1947 (amended 1952) that supports your claim.
Muslims are trying to kill us in the name of their religion. We're not going to stand by and get slaughtered because college boys claim that it's unconstitutional to ban people from entering the country because of their religion. College boys are operating on their college idealism, not the constitution.

The president has an obligation to protect we the people. If Muslims want to kill us because we are not Muslims, then the president has as his or her duty to protect us from them by way of a temporary ban until it is determined which Muslims want to kill us and which don't based on their religion.
Proud Deplorable.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
philly rabbit

A note;

Pee Wee doesn't have a son in law school because Pee Wee isn't old enough to have a son in law school. Pee Wee is in school himself.

These philosophers from the school house can go to their parties and be cool but they have to stop telling the rest of us how we should live and what we must endure. The men will handle this problem.
Proud Deplorable.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

philly rabbit
Jun 20 2016, 08:54 AM
Tsalagi
Jun 19 2016, 03:30 PM
philly rabbit
Jun 19 2016, 02:49 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deephttp://akinokure.blogspot.com
Please provide for me the pertinent Constitutional Authority to disregard the 1st Amendment to the Constitution, or revelant National Security Act of 1947 (amended 1952) that supports your claim.
Muslims are trying to kill us in the name of their religion. We're not going to stand by and get slaughtered because college boys claim that it's unconstitutional to ban people from entering the country because of their religion. College boys are operating on their college idealism, not the constitution.

The president has an obligation to protect we the people. If Muslims want to kill us because we are not Muslims, then the president has as his or her duty to protect us from them by way of a temporary ban until it is determined which Muslims want to kill us and which don't based on their religion.
Which is what I figured, you don't want to do the research, you know it wouldn't stand up to a Constitutional Review, you know the USSC would reverse any such legislation IF it even made it into Law.

Pssssst....I never went to college, but I can read a copy of the Constitution easily enough. I suggest you do the same. The President has an obligation within the bounds of the Law. No such ban even IF it could be enacted would never be temporary.

It also does not address home grown Muslims, or those who convert here on US soil. But a ban and a wall plays well in yahooville, where do you live now?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
philly rabbit

Tsalagi
Jun 20 2016, 12:31 PM
philly rabbit
Jun 20 2016, 08:54 AM
Tsalagi
Jun 19 2016, 03:30 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deephttp://akinokure.blogspot.com
Muslims are trying to kill us in the name of their religion. We're not going to stand by and get slaughtered because college boys claim that it's unconstitutional to ban people from entering the country because of their religion. College boys are operating on their college idealism, not the constitution.

The president has an obligation to protect we the people. If Muslims want to kill us because we are not Muslims, then the president has as his or her duty to protect us from them by way of a temporary ban until it is determined which Muslims want to kill us and which don't based on their religion.
Which is what I figured, you don't want to do the research, you know it wouldn't stand up to a Constitutional Review, you know the USSC would reverse any such legislation IF it even made it into Law.

Pssssst....I never went to college, but I can read a copy of the Constitution easily enough. I suggest you do the same. The President has an obligation within the bounds of the Law. No such ban even IF it could be enacted would never be temporary.

It also does not address home grown Muslims, or those who convert here on US soil. But a ban and a wall plays well in yahooville, where do you live now?
Your impressions of the working middle class is telling. And with you as always, there's always all those white faces.

Universities are Marxist breeding grounds. School children will get us killed if we listen to them .. and you killed too. Unless you convert to Islam, Islamic Jihad doesn't discriminate.
Edited by philly rabbit, Jun 23 2016, 08:10 AM.
Proud Deplorable.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

philly rabbit
Jun 23 2016, 08:07 AM
Tsalagi
Jun 20 2016, 12:31 PM
philly rabbit
Jun 20 2016, 08:54 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deephttp://akinokure.blogspot.com
Which is what I figured, you don't want to do the research, you know it wouldn't stand up to a Constitutional Review, you know the USSC would reverse any such legislation IF it even made it into Law.

Pssssst....I never went to college, but I can read a copy of the Constitution easily enough. I suggest you do the same. The President has an obligation within the bounds of the Law. No such ban even IF it could be enacted would never be temporary.

It also does not address home grown Muslims, or those who convert here on US soil. But a ban and a wall plays well in yahooville, where do you live now?
Your impressions of the working middle class is telling. And with you as always, there's always all those white faces.

Universities are Marxist breeding grounds. School children will get us killed if we listen to them .. and you killed too. Unless you convert to Islam, Islamic Jihad doesn't discriminate.
Ahmmm...I'm middle class, and my expectations I suspect are different then yours. I never said anything about white faces, why are you so obsessed with race and inferring I'm a racist. Where, in anything have I EVER written would state categorically that I hate white people, or that I think I'm better then white people?

Universities are about opening up the mind to endless possibilities. You have quite a hatred for college educated people, I'm guessing you got slighted by someone with a degree, passed over for a job promotion, a girl taken away, something, it goes beyond your political rant. I would love to have you sit down with a psychiatrist and work towards a resolution to all this hate you've been exhibiting on the old and new p.com.

I mean, are you using this site to vent your anger and rage, sure looks like it?

I'm also not afraid of a Jihad coming to our shores. Trump would have you believe it that it's happening right now.

Perhaps you can tell me what use is a ban against the 3.5 MILLLIONS American citizens who are practicing Muslims?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
« Previous Topic · Conservative.com & Republican.com politics forum · Next Topic »
Add Reply