Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Perspectives. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
T needs to go
Topic Started: Jun 21 2016, 02:29 PM (2,730 Views)
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jun 20 2016, 02:19 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 20 2016, 10:49 AM
Tsalagi
Jun 17 2016, 01:38 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deepNo big surprise there Liberal. Anything thing with Military stamped on it and you get tingles up your leg.
I don't use the government Liberal. I work to minimize it.
Really, here you are advocating the government deny women the right to be drafted just like any other citizen...seems like it government is ok when you want to use it for your cause of the moment?
Posted Image
:box: "Deny women the RIGHT to be DRAFTED."
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

I am so ever impressed that you and Philly both apparently fail to understand the simple concepts I put out...and the only reason you call me a liberal is because you're to the right of McCarthy...to the point you just cheered on the death of 4 US military personnel
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

There he is :cheers:
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 02:49 PM
I am so ever impressed that you and Philly both apparently fail to understand the simple concepts I put out...and the only reason you call me a liberal is because you're to the right of McCarthy...to the point you just cheered on the death of 4 US military personnel
Hey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria.
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:05 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 02:49 PM
I am so ever impressed that you and Philly both apparently fail to understand the simple concepts I put out...and the only reason you call me a liberal is because you're to the right of McCarthy...to the point you just cheered on the death of 4 US military personnel
Hey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria.
And you show a further disregard for the Contitution, and our legal system of jurisprudence, in both civilian and military systems, to the concept of "Innocent until proven guilty". Please provide the legal argument that these US military personnel have violated either the Uniform Code of Military Justice or the Geneva Conventions please in order to determine your accusation of war criminals.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:20 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:05 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 02:49 PM
I am so ever impressed that you and Philly both apparently fail to understand the simple concepts I put out...and the only reason you call me a liberal is because you're to the right of McCarthy...to the point you just cheered on the death of 4 US military personnel
Hey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria.
And you show a further disregard for the Contitution, and our legal system of jurisprudence, in both civilian and military systems, to the concept of "Innocent until proven guilty". Please provide the legal argument that these US military personnel have violated either the Uniform Code of Military Justice or the Geneva Conventions please in order to determine your accusation of war criminals.
Chapter 14. Violation of International and Domestic Laws and Conventions

Violation of the Article 2 of the UN Charter that prohibits the interference in the domestic jurisdiction of any state and the use of force against another sovereign state where it has not committed aggression on other states. Syria did not attack any state outside its sovereign borders.

Posted Image
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:28 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:20 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:05 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deepHey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria.
And you show a further disregard for the Contitution, and our legal system of jurisprudence, in both civilian and military systems, to the concept of "Innocent until proven guilty". Please provide the legal argument that these US military personnel have violated either the Uniform Code of Military Justice or the Geneva Conventions please in order to determine your accusation of war criminals.
Chapter 14. Violation of International and Domestic Laws and Conventions

Violation of the Article 2 of the UN Charter that prohibits the interference in the domestic jurisdiction of any state and the use of force against another sovereign state where it has not committed aggression on other states. Syria did not attack any state outside its sovereign borders.

Posted Image
The UN charter is not the legal authority over these military personnel, they are the Constitution, and the UCMJ, pertinent international over us military would be the Geneva Conventions. The UN charter pertains to a Government.

You categorically said they were war criminals, what crime under either the UCMJ or the Geneva Conventions are they accused of.
Edited by Tsalagi, Jun 21 2016, 03:35 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:34 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:28 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:20 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deepHey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria.
Chapter 14. Violation of International and Domestic Laws and Conventions

Violation of the Article 2 of the UN Charter that prohibits the interference in the domestic jurisdiction of any state and the use of force against another sovereign state where it has not committed aggression on other states. Syria did not attack any state outside its sovereign borders.

Posted Image
The UN charter is not the legal authority over these military personnel, they are the Constitution, and the UCMJ, pertinent international over us military would be the Geneva Conventions. The UN charter pertains to a Government.

You categorically said they were war criminals, what crime under either the UCMJ or the Geneva Conventions are they accused of.
T: "Please provide the legal argument that these US military personnel have violated either the Uniform Code of Military Justice or the Geneva Conventions"

I gave you that Legal proof.

"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:42 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:34 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:28 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deepHey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria. Chapter 14. Violation of International and Domestic Laws and Conventions

Violation of the Article 2 of the UN Charter that prohibits the interference in the domestic jurisdiction of any state and the use of force against another sovereign state where it has not committed aggression on other states. Syria did not attack any state outside its sovereign borders.

Posted Image
The UN charter is not the legal authority over these military personnel, they are the Constitution, and the UCMJ, pertinent international over us military would be the Geneva Conventions. The UN charter pertains to a Government.

You categorically said they were war criminals, what crime under either the UCMJ or the Geneva Conventions are they accused of.
T: "Please provide the legal argument that these US military personnel have violated either the Uniform Code of Military Justice or the Geneva Conventions"

I gave you that Legal proof.

No, you gave an Article under the UN Charter, not the Geneva Conventions, not the same as was already explained to you.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Freaks
Member Avatar

Must be losing your touch, Tsal. You used to get cries for your removal much more often than you do now. Step up your game, bro.
"I'll be the fella to save his Cinderella,
by turnin' her dream world into real life."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Freaks1932
Jun 21 2016, 03:51 PM
Must be losing your touch, Tsal. You used to get cries for your removal much more often than you do now. Step up your game, bro.
Not as young as I once was, maybe I'm losing my mojo?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:44 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:42 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:34 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deepHey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria. Chapter 14. Violation of International and Domestic Laws and Conventions

Violation of the Article 2 of the UN Charter that prohibits the interference in the domestic jurisdiction of any state and the use of force against another sovereign state where it has not committed aggression on other states. Syria did not attack any state outside its sovereign borders.

Posted Image
T: "Please provide the legal argument that these US military personnel have violated either the Uniform Code of Military Justice or the Geneva Conventions"

I gave you that Legal proof.

No, you gave an Article under the UN Charter, not the Geneva Conventions, not the same as was already explained to you.
Whatever the case, Those military deaths are justified. They are in another country illegally.
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:53 PM
Freaks1932
Jun 21 2016, 03:51 PM
Must be losing your touch, Tsal. You used to get cries for your removal much more often than you do now. Step up your game, bro.
Not as young as I once was, maybe I'm losing my mojo?
I'm in my Prime. :victory:
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 02:29 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 20 2016, 02:19 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 20 2016, 10:49 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deepNo big surprise there Liberal. Anything thing with Military stamped on it and you get tingles up your leg. I don't use the government Liberal. I work to minimize it.
Really, here you are advocating the government deny women the right to be drafted just like any other citizen...seems like it government is ok when you want to use it for your cause of the moment?
Posted Image
:box: "Deny women the RIGHT to be DRAFTED."
bump for the OP.
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:54 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:44 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:42 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deepHey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria. Chapter 14. Violation of International and Domestic Laws and Conventions

Violation of the Article 2 of the UN Charter that prohibits the interference in the domestic jurisdiction of any state and the use of force against another sovereign state where it has not committed aggression on other states. Syria did not attack any state outside its sovereign borders.

Posted ImageT: "Please provide the legal argument that these US military personnel have violated either the Uniform Code of Military Justice or the Geneva Conventions"

I gave you that Legal proof.

No, you gave an Article under the UN Charter, not the Geneva Conventions, not the same as was already explained to you.
Whatever the case, Those military deaths are justified. They are in another country illegally.
You've yet to prove that case under the pertinent legal system of jurisprudence here, at best you can make a case for their deployment to be an unlawful order, but there are at least 3 types of security agreements or treaties offhand that would allow for us military personnel to be in country.

In short, no, they're not war criminals.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:57 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:54 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:44 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deepHey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria. Chapter 14. Violation of International and Domestic Laws and Conventions

Violation of the Article 2 of the UN Charter that prohibits the interference in the domestic jurisdiction of any state and the use of force against another sovereign state where it has not committed aggression on other states. Syria did not attack any state outside its sovereign borders.

Posted ImageT: "Please provide the legal argument that these US military personnel have violated either the Uniform Code of Military Justice or the Geneva Conventions"

I gave you that Legal proof.
Whatever the case, Those military deaths are justified. They are in another country illegally.
You've yet to prove that case under the pertinent legal system of jurisprudence here, at best you can make a case for their deployment to be an unlawful order, but there are at least 3 types of security agreements or treaties offhand that would allow for us military personnel to be in country.

In short, no, they're not war criminals.
US soldiers are in another country illegally.


The burden is on you to prove otherwise.
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 04:07 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:57 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 03:54 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deepHey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria. Chapter 14. Violation of International and Domestic Laws and Conventions

Violation of the Article 2 of the UN Charter that prohibits the interference in the domestic jurisdiction of any state and the use of force against another sovereign state where it has not committed aggression on other states. Syria did not attack any state outside its sovereign borders.

Posted ImageT: "Please provide the legal argument that these US military personnel have violated either the Uniform Code of Military Justice or the Geneva Conventions"

I gave you that Legal proof. Whatever the case, Those military deaths are justified. They are in another country illegally.
You've yet to prove that case under the pertinent legal system of jurisprudence here, at best you can make a case for their deployment to be an unlawful order, but there are at least 3 types of security agreements or treaties offhand that would allow for us military personnel to be in country.

In short, no, they're not war criminals.
US soldiers are in another country illegally.


The burden is on you to prove otherwise.
Actually, the burden of proof in our system of justice is that yes, you have to make that accusation stick. But I digress....I'm having an early dinner with the missus. You'll excuse me.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Robertr2000
Member Avatar

Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 04:19 PM
Robertr2000
Jun 21 2016, 04:07 PM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 03:57 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deepHey hey now T...... only the 4 war criminals in Syria. Chapter 14. Violation of International and Domestic Laws and Conventions

Violation of the Article 2 of the UN Charter that prohibits the interference in the domestic jurisdiction of any state and the use of force against another sovereign state where it has not committed aggression on other states. Syria did not attack any state outside its sovereign borders.

Posted ImageT: "Please provide the legal argument that these US military personnel have violated either the Uniform Code of Military Justice or the Geneva Conventions"

I gave you that Legal proof. Whatever the case, Those military deaths are justified. They are in another country illegally.
US soldiers are in another country illegally.


The burden is on you to prove otherwise.
Actually, the burden of proof in our system of justice is that yes, you have to make that accusation stick. But I digress....I'm having an early dinner with the missus. You'll excuse me.
I haven't excused you yet.... US troops in a Sovereign country without consent of that country are criminals. <--- that's a period.
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
philly rabbit

Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 02:49 PM
I am so ever impressed that you and Philly both apparently fail to understand the simple concepts I put out...and the only reason you call me a liberal is because you're to the right of McCarthy...to the point you just cheered on the death of 4 US military personnel
You've gone over the line here with your refusal to support the new republican candidate on a republican board. Your fan Jake has gone as far as to announce that Hillary would be a better president than Trump, that should get him removed here permanently. You've been close here to a rules violation but you've been careful not to give Hillary an actual endorsement.

As far as you being a liberal, that's a given. You are indeed, a big government liberal who refuses to support the upcoming GOP candidate. You're on the borderline and as hard to believe as it is, you're not far from a forum rules violation that I will report if you screw up.
Proud Deplorable.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tsalagi
Member Avatar

philly rabbit
Jun 22 2016, 08:39 AM
Tsalagi
Jun 21 2016, 02:49 PM
I am so ever impressed that you and Philly both apparently fail to understand the simple concepts I put out...and the only reason you call me a liberal is because you're to the right of McCarthy...to the point you just cheered on the death of 4 US military personnel
You've gone over the line here with your refusal to support the new republican candidate on a republican board. Your fan Jake has gone as far as to announce that Hillary would be a better president than Trump, that should get him removed here permanently. You've been close here to a rules violation but you've been careful not to give Hillary an actual endorsement.

As far as you being a liberal, that's a given. You are indeed, a big government liberal who refuses to support the upcoming GOP candidate. You're on the borderline and as hard to believe as it is, you're not far from a forum rules violation that I will report if you screw up.
How is not giving Trump the nod "over the line", I don't care if he's the presumptive nominee, there is a huge amount of Republicans who think he's not qualified, he sure as hell isn't conservative, and he's in the pocket with both Mexican and Chinese financial assets there. He's never met a crony he didn't like as long as it benefitted him financially. There is your "anti-establishment" Republican. My guy didn't make it, bad deal for Kasich, that does not mean I believe Trump is good for my party, because Trump attracts guys like Edge who want to make it a "Whites Only Club"...don't believe me, just ask him, he'll tell you straight up. Which leaves me where?

When did you become such a friggin baby, it's like I'm not even talking to an adult anymore? I have never been so much as warned, the same can not be said of you, some of the crap you've pulled should have given you a permaban YEARS ago.

Again, let me educate you, being for "smart government" is not the same as "big government", I realize big words are difficult for you, but I simply can't dumb it down any further then that. I'm a social liberal, never denied it. The social angle of the GOP has always been what the Christian Right endorsed, as I'm not a Christian, their hang ups are not mine. You know if you're truly a conservative you wouldn't want the GOvernment to endorse, support, or otherwise push one religion's values over another's.

Now did I leave anything out?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Conservative.com & Republican.com politics forum · Next Topic »
Add Reply