|
T needs to go
|
|
Topic Started: Jun 21 2016, 02:29 PM (2,735 Views)
|
|
Demagogue
|
Jun 22 2016, 10:34 AM
Post #21
|
|
Administrator
- Posts:
- 8,219
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 09:20 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jun 22 2016, 08:39 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 21 2016, 02:49 PM
I am so ever impressed that you and Philly both apparently fail to understand the simple concepts I put out...and the only reason you call me a liberal is because you're to the right of McCarthy...to the point you just cheered on the death of 4 US military personnel
You've gone over the line here with your refusal to support the new republican candidate on a republican board. Your fan Jake has gone as far as to announce that Hillary would be a better president than Trump, that should get him removed here permanently. You've been close here to a rules violation but you've been careful not to give Hillary an actual endorsement. As far as you being a liberal, that's a given. You are indeed, a big government liberal who refuses to support the upcoming GOP candidate. You're on the borderline and as hard to believe as it is, you're not far from a forum rules violation that I will report if you screw up.
How is not giving Trump the nod "over the line", I don't care if he's the presumptive nominee, there is a huge amount of Republicans who think he's not qualified, he sure as hell isn't conservative, and he's in the pocket with both Mexican and Chinese financial assets there. To be fair, he is far less "in the pocket" of Chinese and Mexican interests than the Clinton's are.
Heck, Hillary Clinton's entire political existence should be labeled "Brought to you by the Government of China." Neither of these candidates are worth spitting on.
The one thing that Trump does have is the fact that he is not Hillary. Unless they find a way to replace him with someone else, that one thing will hopefully be enough.
|
|
People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to visit violence on those who would do them harm.
|
| |
|
Drudge X
|
Jun 22 2016, 11:21 AM
Post #22
|
|
- Posts:
- 14,706
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #11
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
Nah... I think Mr. T should stay, despite the fact that he berates me every now and then.
|
|
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
|
| |
|
voted4reagan
|
Jun 22 2016, 01:07 PM
Post #23
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,578
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #78
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Robertr2000
- Jun 21 2016, 02:29 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 20 2016, 02:19 PM
- Robertr2000
- Jun 20 2016, 10:49 AM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deepNo big surprise there Liberal. Anything thing with Military stamped on it and you get tingles up your leg. I don't use the government Liberal. I work to minimize it.
Really, here you are advocating the government deny women the right to be drafted just like any other citizen...seems like it government is ok when you want to use it for your cause of the moment?
"Deny women the RIGHT to be DRAFTED." You meed to go... you are a registered DEMOCRAT
|
Trump needs to focus more so on the male vote. He should have nationalized the Boy Scouts when they decided to admit girls.
Harambe4Trump AKA "FASHY"
|
| |
|
philly rabbit
|
Jun 22 2016, 02:43 PM
Post #24
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,092
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #69
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 09:20 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jun 22 2016, 08:39 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 21 2016, 02:49 PM
I am so ever impressed that you and Philly both apparently fail to understand the simple concepts I put out...and the only reason you call me a liberal is because you're to the right of McCarthy...to the point you just cheered on the death of 4 US military personnel
You've gone over the line here with your refusal to support the new republican candidate on a republican board. Your fan Jake has gone as far as to announce that Hillary would be a better president than Trump, that should get him removed here permanently. You've been close here to a rules violation but you've been careful not to give Hillary an actual endorsement. As far as you being a liberal, that's a given. You are indeed, a big government liberal who refuses to support the upcoming GOP candidate. You're on the borderline and as hard to believe as it is, you're not far from a forum rules violation that I will report if you screw up.
How is not giving Trump the nod "over the line", I don't care if he's the presumptive nominee, there is a huge amount of Republicans who think he's not qualified, he sure as hell isn't conservative, and he's in the pocket with both Mexican and Chinese financial assets there. He's never met a crony he didn't like as long as it benefitted him financially. There is your "anti-establishment" Republican. My guy didn't make it, bad deal for Kasich, that does not mean I believe Trump is good for my party, because Trump attracts guys like Edge who want to make it a "Whites Only Club"...don't believe me, just ask him, he'll tell you straight up. Which leaves me where? When did you become such a friggin baby, it's like I'm not even talking to an adult anymore? I have never been so much as warned, the same can not be said of you, some of the crap you've pulled should have given you a permaban YEARS ago. Again, let me educate you, being for "smart government" is not the same as "big government", I realize big words are difficult for you, but I simply can't dumb it down any further then that. I'm a social liberal, never denied it. The social angle of the GOP has always been what the Christian Right endorsed, as I'm not a Christian, their hang ups are not mine. You know if you're truly a conservative you wouldn't want the GOvernment to endorse, support, or otherwise push one religion's values over another's. Now did I leave anything out? Yea, you left this out.... http://unitedstates.com/topic/8470423/1/#new
Your defense of Hillary on my thread from a few days ago by bashing Trump. I said nothing about Trump in the OP. You made it your business to bash him. You said nothing about the OP and Hillary.
Care to explain yourself, Mr. Republican?
|
|
Proud Deplorable.
|
| |
|
philly rabbit
|
Jun 22 2016, 02:47 PM
Post #25
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,092
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #69
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Drudge X
- Jun 22 2016, 11:21 AM
Nah... I think Mr. T should stay, despite the fact that he berates me every now and then. I've never called for his removal either at no time. But if he writes something that even resembles an endorsement of Hillary Clinton, I'm going to report it. THAT is a rules violation here, showing support for the Dem candidate especially during a general election season.
Jake has already endorsed Hillary for president and both mods here are anti Trump so he'll get tons of wiggle room if he slips up and endorses but that wont stop me from reporting him.
|
|
Proud Deplorable.
|
| |
|
Freaks
|
Jun 22 2016, 03:24 PM
Post #26
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,951
- Group:
- Global Moderators
- Member
- #13
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- philly rabbit
- Jun 22 2016, 02:47 PM
- Drudge X
- Jun 22 2016, 11:21 AM
Nah... I think Mr. T should stay, despite the fact that he berates me every now and then.
I've never called for his removal either at no time. But if he writes something that even resembles an endorsement of Hillary Clinton, I'm going to report it. THAT is a rules violation here, showing support for the Dem candidate especially during a general election season. Jake has already endorsed Hillary for president and both mods here are anti Trump so he'll get tons of wiggle room if he slips up and endorses but that wont stop me from reporting him. In the thread you posted Tsal had said he did not support Hillary but couldn't stomach hypocrisy. You are correct, however, that if somebody openly endorses Hillary on this board that it's against the rules.
|
"I'll be the fella to save his Cinderella, by turnin' her dream world into real life."
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jun 22 2016, 03:41 PM
Post #27
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,678
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- philly rabbit
- Jun 22 2016, 02:43 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 09:20 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jun 22 2016, 08:39 AM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
How is not giving Trump the nod "over the line", I don't care if he's the presumptive nominee, there is a huge amount of Republicans who think he's not qualified, he sure as hell isn't conservative, and he's in the pocket with both Mexican and Chinese financial assets there. He's never met a crony he didn't like as long as it benefitted him financially. There is your "anti-establishment" Republican. My guy didn't make it, bad deal for Kasich, that does not mean I believe Trump is good for my party, because Trump attracts guys like Edge who want to make it a "Whites Only Club"...don't believe me, just ask him, he'll tell you straight up. Which leaves me where? When did you become such a friggin baby, it's like I'm not even talking to an adult anymore? I have never been so much as warned, the same can not be said of you, some of the crap you've pulled should have given you a permaban YEARS ago. Again, let me educate you, being for "smart government" is not the same as "big government", I realize big words are difficult for you, but I simply can't dumb it down any further then that. I'm a social liberal, never denied it. The social angle of the GOP has always been what the Christian Right endorsed, as I'm not a Christian, their hang ups are not mine. You know if you're truly a conservative you wouldn't want the GOvernment to endorse, support, or otherwise push one religion's values over another's. Now did I leave anything out?
Yea, you left this out.... http://unitedstates.com/topic/8470423/1/#newYour defense of Hillary on my thread from a few days ago by bashing Trump. I said nothing about Trump in the OP. You made it your business to bash him. You said nothing about the OP and Hillary. Care to explain yourself, Mr. Republican? Excuse me,where is my distaste for hypocrisy a defense of Clinton? OH I see, you expected me to bash Hillary and leave Trump alone for possibly doing the same thing she does? Is that what you expected of me?
|
|
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jun 22 2016, 03:44 PM
Post #28
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,678
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
One other thing, yes, Trump should be bashed, he's quite possibly the worst candidate my party has ever put up for office, based on no small measure to his pandering to the low information white voter that Hispanics are taking their jobs, Blacks are thugs, Muslims are coming to kill us all, and He just loves women, just not those who disagree with him and put him on the spot for it..i.e. Megyn Kelly.
You see, I'm not bashing the Party, I'm bashing Trump not the same thing.
|
|
|
| |
|
Drudge X
|
Jun 22 2016, 03:57 PM
Post #29
|
|
- Posts:
- 14,706
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #11
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 03:44 PM
One other thing, yes, Trump should be bashed, he's quite possibly the worst candidate my party has ever put up for office, based on no small measure to his pandering to the low information white voter that Hispanics are taking their jobs, Blacks are thugs, Muslims are coming to kill us all, and He just loves women, just not those who disagree with him and put him on the spot for it..i.e. Megyn Kelly.
You see, I'm not bashing the Party, I'm bashing Trump not the same thing. So are still sour that Kasich did not get the nod?
|
|
Kate Steinle was separated from her family permanently but leftists didn't seem to mind.
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jun 22 2016, 05:48 PM
Post #30
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,678
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Drudge X
- Jun 22 2016, 03:57 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 03:44 PM
One other thing, yes, Trump should be bashed, he's quite possibly the worst candidate my party has ever put up for office, based on no small measure to his pandering to the low information white voter that Hispanics are taking their jobs, Blacks are thugs, Muslims are coming to kill us all, and He just loves women, just not those who disagree with him and put him on the spot for it..i.e. Megyn Kelly.
You see, I'm not bashing the Party, I'm bashing Trump not the same thing.
So are still sour that Kasich did not get the nod? Sore?...I'm not 12 Drudge, my guy lost...s**t happens. He's effective, reasonable, willing to compromise with the Democrats to get something done, but he's not charismatic, and he doesn't demonize the Democrats, and a good portion of the base want that, the want you to say bad things, or worse say things they're too cowardly to say in public about the opposition.
|
|
|
| |
|
philly rabbit
|
Jun 23 2016, 08:17 AM
Post #31
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,092
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #69
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 03:41 PM
- philly rabbit
- Jun 22 2016, 02:43 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 09:20 AM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Yea, you left this out.... http://unitedstates.com/topic/8470423/1/#newYour defense of Hillary on my thread from a few days ago by bashing Trump. I said nothing about Trump in the OP. You made it your business to bash him. You said nothing about the OP and Hillary. Care to explain yourself, Mr. Republican?
Excuse me,where is my distaste for hypocrisy a defense of Clinton? OH I see, you expected me to bash Hillary and leave Trump alone for possibly doing the same thing she does? Is that what you expected of me? I gave you an avenue to do some Hillary bashing on that thread and you declined then went after Trump instead. Nowhere on that thread did you have a single negative word for Hillary who's foundation is accepting money from countries that discriminate against women, gays, Christians, and Jews.
You can't help yourself, can you? I honestly believe that you don't realize just how far in the tank you are for Hillary for the sake of your left wing allies in this forum.
|
|
Proud Deplorable.
|
| |
|
philly rabbit
|
Jun 23 2016, 08:20 AM
Post #32
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,092
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #69
- Joined:
- Mar 20, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 05:48 PM
- Drudge X
- Jun 22 2016, 03:57 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 03:44 PM
One other thing, yes, Trump should be bashed, he's quite possibly the worst candidate my party has ever put up for office, based on no small measure to his pandering to the low information white voter that Hispanics are taking their jobs, Blacks are thugs, Muslims are coming to kill us all, and He just loves women, just not those who disagree with him and put him on the spot for it..i.e. Megyn Kelly.
You see, I'm not bashing the Party, I'm bashing Trump not the same thing.
So are still sour that Kasich did not get the nod?
Sore?...I'm not 12 Drudge, my guy lost...s**t happens. He's effective, reasonable, willing to compromise with the Democrats to get something done, but he's not charismatic, and he doesn't demonize the Democrats, and a good portion of the base want that, the want you to say bad things, or worse say things they're too cowardly to say in public about the opposition. Should Hillary give the money back? Let me see you answer this question without mentioning Trump a single time.
My money says you can't do it because you know your forum left wing fans are reading this. Go ahead, should she?
|
|
Proud Deplorable.
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jun 23 2016, 08:28 AM
Post #33
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,678
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- philly rabbit
- Jun 23 2016, 08:20 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 05:48 PM
- Drudge X
- Jun 22 2016, 03:57 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Sore?...I'm not 12 Drudge, my guy lost...s**t happens. He's effective, reasonable, willing to compromise with the Democrats to get something done, but he's not charismatic, and he doesn't demonize the Democrats, and a good portion of the base want that, the want you to say bad things, or worse say things they're too cowardly to say in public about the opposition.
Should Hillary give the money back? Let me see you answer this question without mentioning Trump a single time. My money says you can't do it because you know your forum left wing fans are reading this. Go ahead, should she? Admittedly I don't atypically read bash threads as I believe they don't serve much purpose, so you'll forgive me if I ask the simplest of questions...what money and if it's legally obtained, why should she give it back, is her money, her family's money, her charities's money?
Ok, having now read your earlier statement, I addressed it later...Given the types of programs the Clinton Foundation provides funds directly too, pros and cons to what you suggest,
Edited by Tsalagi, Jun 23 2016, 08:37 AM.
|
|
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jun 23 2016, 08:36 AM
Post #34
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,678
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- philly rabbit
- Jun 23 2016, 08:17 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 03:41 PM
- philly rabbit
- Jun 22 2016, 02:43 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep http://unitedstates.com/topic/8470423/1/#newYour defense of Hillary on my thread from a few days ago by bashing Trump. I said nothing about Trump in the OP. You made it your business to bash him. You said nothing about the OP and Hillary. Care to explain yourself, Mr. Republican?
Excuse me,where is my distaste for hypocrisy a defense of Clinton? OH I see, you expected me to bash Hillary and leave Trump alone for possibly doing the same thing she does? Is that what you expected of me?
I gave you an avenue to do some Hillary bashing on that thread and you declined then went after Trump instead. Nowhere on that thread did you have a single negative word for Hillary who's foundation is accepting money from countries that discriminate against women, gays, Christians, and Jews. You can't help yourself, can you? I honestly believe that you don't realize just how far in the tank you are for Hillary for the sake of your left wing allies in this forum. Sorry, but that's not a bashing of Hillary..You're right, you said nothing bout Trump, someone else brought him into it. As for her organization, that would be up to the Organization's Board of Directors I believe as to where such funds are returned to their donors. Not her's personally. Do I think she should?..I guess on some level, I'd have to weigh the good against the negative, do such funds go to needy causes, should the origins of such money be a determining factor on whether they can help a child read, be feed, or AIDS medicine delivered.
|
|
|
| |
|
Robertr2000
|
Jun 23 2016, 02:28 PM
Post #35
|
|
- Posts:
- 12,358
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #43
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 09:20 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jun 22 2016, 08:39 AM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 21 2016, 02:49 PM
I am so ever impressed that you and Philly both apparently fail to understand the simple concepts I put out...and the only reason you call me a liberal is because you're to the right of McCarthy...to the point you just cheered on the death of 4 US military personnel
You've gone over the line here with your refusal to support the new republican candidate on a republican board. Your fan Jake has gone as far as to announce that Hillary would be a better president than Trump, that should get him removed here permanently. You've been close here to a rules violation but you've been careful not to give Hillary an actual endorsement. As far as you being a liberal, that's a given. You are indeed, a big government liberal who refuses to support the upcoming GOP candidate. You're on the borderline and as hard to believe as it is, you're not far from a forum rules violation that I will report if you screw up.
How is not giving Trump the nod "over the line", I don't care if he's the presumptive nominee, there is a huge amount of Republicans who think he's not qualified, he sure as hell isn't conservative, and he's in the pocket with both Mexican and Chinese financial assets there. He's never met a crony he didn't like as long as it benefitted him financially. There is your "anti-establishment" Republican. My guy didn't make it, bad deal for Kasich, that does not mean I believe Trump is good for my party, because Trump attracts guys like Edge who want to make it a "Whites Only Club"...don't believe me, just ask him, he'll tell you straight up. Which leaves me where? When did you become such a friggin baby, it's like I'm not even talking to an adult anymore? I have never been so much as warned, the same can not be said of you, some of the crap you've pulled should have given you a permaban YEARS ago. Again, let me educate you, being for "smart government" is not the same as "big government", I realize big words are difficult for you, but I simply can't dumb it down any further then that. I'm a social liberal, never denied it. The social angle of the GOP has always been what the Christian Right endorsed, as I'm not a Christian, their hang ups are not mine. You know if you're truly a conservative you wouldn't want the GOvernment to endorse, support, or otherwise push one religion's values over another's. Now did I leave anything out? "I'm a social liberal" = Big Government
|
|
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jun 23 2016, 03:54 PM
Post #36
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,678
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Robertr2000
- Jun 23 2016, 02:28 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 09:20 AM
- philly rabbit
- Jun 22 2016, 08:39 AM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
How is not giving Trump the nod "over the line", I don't care if he's the presumptive nominee, there is a huge amount of Republicans who think he's not qualified, he sure as hell isn't conservative, and he's in the pocket with both Mexican and Chinese financial assets there. He's never met a crony he didn't like as long as it benefitted him financially. There is your "anti-establishment" Republican. My guy didn't make it, bad deal for Kasich, that does not mean I believe Trump is good for my party, because Trump attracts guys like Edge who want to make it a "Whites Only Club"...don't believe me, just ask him, he'll tell you straight up. Which leaves me where? When did you become such a friggin baby, it's like I'm not even talking to an adult anymore? I have never been so much as warned, the same can not be said of you, some of the crap you've pulled should have given you a permaban YEARS ago. Again, let me educate you, being for "smart government" is not the same as "big government", I realize big words are difficult for you, but I simply can't dumb it down any further then that. I'm a social liberal, never denied it. The social angle of the GOP has always been what the Christian Right endorsed, as I'm not a Christian, their hang ups are not mine. You know if you're truly a conservative you wouldn't want the GOvernment to endorse, support, or otherwise push one religion's values over another's. Now did I leave anything out?
"I'm a social liberal" = Big Government Really, because I don't support the Christian Right's agenda that makes me for Big Government? You have GOT to be tell me how that makes it happen.
|
|
|
| |
|
Robertr2000
|
Jun 23 2016, 09:41 PM
Post #37
|
|
- Posts:
- 12,358
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #43
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jun 23 2016, 03:54 PM
- Robertr2000
- Jun 23 2016, 02:28 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 22 2016, 09:20 AM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
"I'm a social liberal" = Big Government
Really, because I don't support the Christian Right's agenda that makes me for Big Government? You have GOT to be tell me how that makes it happen. I don't GOT to do anything. but.. not supporting christian rights agenda (is that a thing?) doesn't mean anything.
|
|
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
|
| |
|
Tsalagi
|
Jun 23 2016, 10:31 PM
Post #38
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,678
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Robertr2000
- Jun 23 2016, 09:41 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 23 2016, 03:54 PM
- Robertr2000
- Jun 23 2016, 02:28 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep= Big Government
Really, because I don't support the Christian Right's agenda that makes me for Big Government? You have GOT to be tell me how that makes it happen. I don't GOT to do anything. but.. not supporting christian rights agenda (is that a thing?) doesn't mean anything. You're the one who just made an accusation that being a social liberal equated to being for big government, and I asked you how you came to that conclusion. You of course didn't answer the question.
|
|
|
| |
|
Freaks
|
Jun 24 2016, 01:50 AM
Post #39
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,951
- Group:
- Global Moderators
- Member
- #13
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jun 23 2016, 10:31 PM
- Robertr2000
- Jun 23 2016, 09:41 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 23 2016, 03:54 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep= Big Government
I don't GOT to do anything. but.. not supporting christian rights agenda (is that a thing?) doesn't mean anything.
You're the one who just made an accusation that being a social liberal equated to being for big government, and I asked you how you came to that conclusion. You of course didn't answer the question. I was wondering the same thing. Maybe he's thinking of social programs but that doesn't have to relate to being socially liberal on many issues.
|
"I'll be the fella to save his Cinderella, by turnin' her dream world into real life."
|
| |
|
Robertr2000
|
Jun 24 2016, 09:12 AM
Post #40
|
|
- Posts:
- 12,358
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #43
- Joined:
- Mar 18, 2016
|
- Tsalagi
- Jun 23 2016, 10:31 PM
- Robertr2000
- Jun 23 2016, 09:41 PM
- Tsalagi
- Jun 23 2016, 03:54 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep= Big Government
I don't GOT to do anything. but.. not supporting christian rights agenda (is that a thing?) doesn't mean anything.
You're the one who just made an accusation that being a social liberal equated to being for big government, and I asked you how you came to that conclusion. You of course didn't answer the question. "being a social liberal equated to being for big government"
Yes.
|
|
"if that **** wins we'll all hang from nooses"
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|